Akamai CloudTest vs RadView WebLOAD comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and Radview are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Radview is ranked #12. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Radview’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 69% of Radview users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,432 Views
1,174 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

RadView WebLOAD

Read 9 RadView WebLOAD reviews

1,675 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

69% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

RadView WebLOAD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and RadView WebLOAD are performance testing solutions. Akamai CloudTest seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities and cloud-based setup that provides scalability and flexibility.

Features: Akamai CloudTest offers real-time analytics, cloud integration for scalable tests, and user-friendly live monitoring with custom dashboards. RadView WebLOAD provides detailed insights into application performance, supports various protocols, and uses a standard scripting language, JavaScript, for flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could improve its upfront cost structure and reporting capabilities. RadView WebLOAD could enhance its initial deployment complexity, expand protocol support further, and streamline user interface elements for better ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest's cloud-based model simplifies setup with minimal infrastructure changes and efficient customer service. RadView WebLOAD offers both on-premises and cloud options, providing flexibility but with potentially higher initial complexity, complemented by thorough support during integration.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest is known for higher upfront costs, justified by its integration capabilities over time. RadView WebLOAD offers competitive pricing, providing cost-effectiveness without losing essential functionalities, though its ROI depends on specific deployment needs and scale.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. RadView WebLOAD Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,565 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RadView WebLOAD

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RadView WebLOAD is 3.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
RadView WebLOAD	3.5%
Other	93.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

it_user1265766

Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.

IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated

You pay for the number of users that you're going to be utilizing. In order to scale up, you would have to pay for additional users, but for our use case, we're able to scale fairly easily. We have a license for 500, but we're using half of that for our initial workflow. For maintenance, as far as I'm aware, there's only one person really working on the maintenance of it and we only really have one user consistently using the software. He's a QA person. We don't have any plans to increase our usage. Even though we've had it for a while, we have a major push to start utilizing it more. I imagine we'll probably be using it and utilizing it across our QA team in the next year. We're in the process of determining whether we're going to keep it or not due to the fact that it is so expensive. That's why I've been researching alternatives for the RadView.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"The solution is simple and useful."

"They are the best of all of the vendors I deal with, hands down."

"The ability to conceptualize the experience for users is great, the price as the bang for your buck is good, the user interface is quite user friendly, and the graphics make it easy to follow and are easy to identify."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting; it is interesting, intuitive, and we can do some parameterization."

"The tool itself is very viable for us."

"Customer service is excellent; they're very responsive and willing to work extra hours, and in the first couple of hours that we were up and running, they taught us how to implement it and to figure out and negotiate AWS."

"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

"Technical support has been excellent, responsive, and helpful in trying to work through issues and questions."

More RadView WebLOAD pros

Cons

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"We did have an issue with some of the script working incorrectly in our higher environments."

"I would like to be able to edit a scenario instead of re-recording a scenario."

"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

"It would be great, in addition to the load tool, it would be nice, if Radview offered a JavaScript based functional test tool as well."

"There is no analytical dashboard."

"We have had a lot of trouble with this solution, and it is actually adapted to our application."

"Well there’s one issue when I have five or six scripts-- you have to set up different percentages and the number of connections and users, no matter how I tweak it seems that when I have one of the load scripts in the mix set, a percentage of less than 8-10%, there’s a probability that it won’t run at all."

"When it finds a problem with response times, it doesn't specify exactly where the problem actually is."

More RadView WebLOAD cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

"We purchased a license for two years."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Retailer

10%

Performing Arts

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs RadView WebLOAD

Compared 9% of the time

More RadView WebLOAD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

September 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

RadView WebLOAD

August 2026

Download RadView WebLOAD product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

No data available

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

RadView WebLOAD is a robust load testing tool designed for agile web and mobile application development. It offers comprehensive testing capabilities to ensure application performance under varying traffic loads, meeting the demands of tech-savvy users.

RadView WebLOAD supports complex performance testing scenarios, making it indispensable for developers and QA teams. By simulating thousands of users, it helps identify potential bottlenecks before deployment. This tool provides detailed analytics and reporting, allowing teams to pinpoint issues and optimize application performance.

What are the standout features of RadView WebLOAD?

Load Generation: Efficiently simulate large-scale user traffic from multiple locations.
Script Creation: Flexible scripting using JavaScript for customizing test scenarios.
Real-time Monitoring: Track KPIs and diagnose issues during test execution.
Comprehensive Reporting: Access detailed reports and insights post-test to inform optimization strategies.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrate with CI/CD pipelines to enhance DevOps practices.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Performance Insights: Gain actionable insights for enhancing application performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduce downtime and post-deployment fixes, lowering operational costs.
Scalability: Supports testing under various load conditions ensuring scalability.
Improved User Experience: Prevent performance issues that could affect user satisfaction.
Robust Support: Access to quality customer support and resources for troubleshooting.

In industries such as e-commerce and finance, RadView WebLOAD helps manage high traffic volumes. Retailers use it to prepare for seasonal peaks, while financial institutions rely on it to ensure transaction efficiency. It's an asset for any industry aiming to enhance application reliability and user satisfaction.

Radview

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. RadView WebLOAD

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. RadView WebLOAD

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. RadView WebLOAD and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. RadView WebLOAD report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.