Security Team Leader at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Provides robust threat protection and excellent event tracking over six years
Pros and Cons
- "With the Radware Cloud WAF Service, we have not faced any incidents in six years."
- "Radware could improve technical support by resolving cases in fewer days. This would enhance the overall experience with the product."
What is our primary use case?
We use Radware Cloud WAF Service for cloud web application firewall (WAF) functionality. It serves as our platform for overseeing 17 applications currently. Additionally, we use the API Discovery feature for applications with exposed endpoints, integrating protection and maintaining security. We also utilize Radware's Bot Manager for managing incoming bot traffic.
What is most valuable?
Radware Cloud WAF Service effectively blocks unknown threats and attacks, providing strong security with a low false-positive rate. With the Radware Cloud WAF Service, we have not faced any incidents in six years. The automated analytics module is quite effective in tracking events related to attacks, IP addresses, and countries. API Discovery is also highly valuable, enabling us to protect our applications with end-to-end API protection, while also reducing overhead costs.
What needs improvement?
Radware could improve technical support by resolving cases in fewer days. This would enhance the overall experience with the product.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for approximately six years.
Buyer's Guide
Radware Cloud WAF Service
September 2026
Learn what your peers think about Radware Cloud WAF Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service is excellent, and I would rate it as a ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
For scalability, I would rate Radware Cloud WAF Service as a ten, showing it is highly scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service is exceptional and would be rated as a ten, although there is room for improvement in response times.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We compared Radware to F5 and Cloud Flare. Ultimately, we chose Radware for its pricing, technology, skills, and features that align well with our institution.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment of about thirty percent, allowing us to save time, money, and resources.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is average in terms of cost efficiency.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We compared Radware with F5 and Cloud Flare.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend Radware Cloud WAF Service to others. The overall rating I give the solution is ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Lead Network Reliability Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Quick detection and exceptional support improve protection capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "The automatic detection from Radware Cloud WAF is invaluable, and the support is outstanding."
- "Some of the tools are a bit difficult to navigate, and the user interface could be more user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
We mainly use Radware Cloud WAF Service for DDoS protection. This includes protecting against DDoS attacks. We know if there is an issue, we can quickly set up a call with the Radware team.
How has it helped my organization?
Radware Cloud WAF Service has significantly improved our organization's time of protection and detection capabilities. The support provided by Radware is quick and efficient. We have updated our solution on many occasions, and the design of our network has changed, largely due to Radware providing us with solutions.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is Radware's ability to quickly detect attacks, even though it doesn't always meet the quicker threshold. We can set up a call with the Radware team if needed. Another crucial aspect is the support we receive from Radware, which is very quick and efficient.
What needs improvement?
Some of the tools are a bit difficult to navigate, and the user interface could be more user-friendly. It is not the cheapest solution, so cost is something to consider.
For how long have I used the solution?
I started using Radware Cloud WAF Service when I joined the company about a year and a half ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have never come across downtime, bugs, or glitches when working with Radware Cloud WAF Service. From that point of view, it maintains a very stable operation.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Anytime we've had any issues, Radware has provided us a solution, indicating its high scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate Radware support a nine out of ten. They are always available to help us, which is invaluable in our line of work.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What was our ROI?
I wouldn't be able to give a number, but Radware Cloud WAF does save time for our staff due to the automation and excellent detection, which is invaluable.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would rate the cost around seven out of ten. Radware provides many different options, but it may not be affordable for companies that aren't large.
What other advice do I have?
The automatic detection from Radware Cloud WAF is invaluable, and the support is outstanding. I would rate the overall solution a nine out of ten, with the only issue being the user interface. The overall product rating is nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Radware Cloud WAF Service
September 2026
Learn what your peers think about Radware Cloud WAF Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CEO at CyberApp
Enhance web security with superior bot protection and automated learning
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of Radware Cloud WAF Service include its automation and learning capabilities for protection, as well as its superior bot mitigation."
- "Radware needs to improve the certificate renewal process for customers who want to be secured with HTTPS."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service is DDoS protection and web application firewalls. My clients use it for these purposes as they want to be protected by a web application firewall against attacks on their websites.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Radware Cloud WAF Service include its automation and learning capabilities for protection, as well as its superior bot mitigation. The precise negative security on the web application firewall is also noteworthy. Additionally, the onboarding process is smooth, allowing customers the unique ability to use the web application firewall on the cloud.
What needs improvement?
Radware needs to improve the certificate renewal process for customers who want to be secured with HTTPS. Some other web application firewalls have a mechanism that allows automatic certificate uploads, which Radware could adopt.
Also, improvements could be made to be more precise on the negative security perspective.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for about two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is very stable, with no experienced downtime on Radware's part. I give it a stability rating of eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is quite scalable, with a rating of eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support for Radware Cloud WAF Service is excellent. They are knowledgeable, speak the technical language, respond quickly, and work collaboratively to overcome challenges. I rate the customer service nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward, involving adding an A record in the customer's infrastructure and ensuring the right certificate is in place.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Radware Cloud WAF Service pricing falls on the pricier side with a rating of seven out of ten. It may not have helped reduce the total cost of ownership.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated other solutions like Incapsula, Impreva, and F5 before choosing Radware.
What other advice do I have?
I advise conducting a POC to ensure that Radware Cloud WAF Service meets specific needs in terms of maintenance and understanding. It takes complex tasks, like web application firewall functions, and simplifies them for customer ease.
I rate the overall solution eight to eight and a half out of ten.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Security analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We benefit from improved security and visibility
Pros and Cons
- "I like that Cloud WAF provides me with lots of information. All the events and all the possible attacks appear in front of you, and false positives appear through different channels."
- "Cloud WAF's management portal lacks many indicators, and the interface could be more user-friendly. It should provide more detailed information on events, possible solutions, and what each event means. While it does give you the event and block part, it doesn't give you a solution. Let's say, for example, someone wants to go into an SQL injection and find a possible solution other than the blocking part, there are no details. It would be good to have possible solutions or the ability to create an automated report to send to the developers in the portal."
What is our primary use case?
The bank uses different channels, such as mobile banking, Internet banking, and Creditnet, and we adopted Cloud WAF to prevent blockages and attacks. We have passed the policy review stage and are ready to begin blocking. Right now, we are in reporting mode and heading to the blocking stage.
How has it helped my organization?
The bank has benefited from improved security and visibility. Two months ago, there was scouting at a national level in Bolivia from Brazil, and it was difficult to find. Cloud WAF gave us that visibility, and as soon as we had a bit of suspicion, we started to block things, mostly traffic. That has benefited us a lot, especially in having more peace of mind and visibility of events and possible attacks.
The network team started with RadWare Alteon, and after that, they began to consider WAF and Cloud WaF. After a month of putting together infrastructure and having clarity, we have already begun to notice the benefit of visibility.
We do have greater visibility of false positives, but we understand that RadWare cannot make the change. It depends more on internal processes to validate false positives. It does provide support by detecting them, and then we need to coordinate internally. For example, we noticed many false positives in SQL injection—around 60 to 70 percent of the false positives were there—so we already have a basis for mitigating them in other channels.
Cloud WAF has freed up our IT staff's time, saving us around 40 percent. For example, because we have visibility on the network level, we do not have to figure things out. If an event occurs in some SIEM or an attack occurs, we can act quickly to prevent the attack and loss of information or economic impact.
From my side, it is a little easier to automatically see these events, show the teams, and coordinate this whole issue rather than spending time investigating, checking logs, and seeing those types of elements on servers, in the DMZ, or in the same application.
What is most valuable?
I like that Cloud WAF provides me with lots of information. All the events and all the possible attacks appear in front of you, and false positives appear through different channels. The solution's automated analytics are excellent. I have several events that appear automatically.
The blocking part seems good. Since I'm just starting on the team, I don't know much about the tool. I'm discovering all its features right now, and they showed me some video tutorials.
We haven't seen any issues with integrating Cloud WAF at the same level of product. For example, we haven't had any problems integrating it with Alteon. I don't have direct experience integrating it with firewalls or other tools, but based on what others are saying, there haven't been any compatibility issues with other applications the bank uses.
What needs improvement?
Cloud WAF's management portal lacks many indicators, and the interface could be more user-friendly. It should provide more detailed information on events, possible solutions, and what each event means. While it does give you the event and block part, it doesn't give you a solution. Let's say, for example, someone wants to go into an SQL injection and find a possible solution other than the blocking part, there are no details. It would be good to have possible solutions or the ability to create an automated report to send to the developers in the portal.
Also, they should offer more Spanish-language tutorial videos. There is only one tutorial in Spanish, which is difficult for us as Latin American customers.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using RadWare Cloud WAF for about two to three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Cloud WAF is very stable. We haven’t had any problems at the portal, tool, or service levels.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are just starting to figure out Cloud WAF's potential, but we already want to increase the usage in our company.
How are customer service and support?
I rate Radware support eight out of 10. I have seen a lot of willingness from their side to help us, but you need to open the ticket and look for the details in English, and most support is in English, so explaining issues to them is challenging.
What was our ROI?
The biggest return on investment comes from improved security and avoiding information losses or DDoS attacks. We gain security and the certainty that we will always be operational. The number of attacks has been reduced, and there is a contingency area here that measures the indicators, including the TCO. It's hard to tell, but it looks like approximately 30 to 40 percent.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Radware Cloud WAF eight out of 10. The interface could be a little more detailed. It would be great if Cloud WAF could provide us with alternative solutions to pass along to the developers, infrastructure, security, and all the teams involved in critical events. For example, you have no alternatives if you have a crisis that can be attended to this week or in the next two weeks. You can only block it or not, making things a bit more complicated.
I don't know the tool well yet, but from what I have seen it could be improved by simplifying the team coordination. Also, the categorization could be better because there are only four or five categories: injection, vulnerabilities, etc. If we had more details and options it would benefit us a lot.
I recommend future users learn a little about the tool before using it and have training. It is extensive, so it's critical to know about the events. This tool opened my eyes. We were not covered through all the protocols, we weren’t really safe, this tool gave me a much-needed security.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Excels at blocking unknown threats and attacks, simplifies the process of identifying anomalies in network traffic, and offers a comprehensive range of benefits
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the monitoring dashboard that we access through the portal."
- "The Cloud Portal has room for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We use Radware Cloud WAF Service to monitor and protect against data packet applications from websites and web applications.
How has it helped my organization?
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels at blocking unknown threats and attacks. It achieves this by providing real-time threat monitoring and reporting across all devices and platforms within our network regardless of the system we're using.
Cloud WAF's automated analytics simplify the process of identifying anomalies in network traffic. This is achieved by analyzing events and correlating them with captured data packets. The WAF can capture data at all seven layers of the OSI model, ensuring comprehensive network flow analysis.
Cloud WAF provides effective end-to-end protection for APIs.
Using the API discovery feature is easy.
The CDN Service works together with its Cloud WAF to secure our applications. Since most threats target the application layer, we leverage the Radware API to monitor activity and receive reports for further analysis and protection. Using Radware CDN Service, and Cloud WAF together is easy.
It offers a comprehensive range of benefits. It provides detailed reporting on network security, allowing us to monitor traffic across all routes. The WAF can then identify and block malicious activity within shared traffic, forwarding only clean traffic to our organization. This proactive approach effectively defines and protects our systems from harmful attacks.
Cloud WAF has helped reduce the number of false positives we receive through fine-tuning by 90 percent.
Radware Cloud WAF is a Cloud platform, so it allows for easy integration with other systems in our environment.
It has helped free up around 60 percent of the time for our IT team to focus on other projects and has helped reduce our total cost of ownership.
The benefits of Radware Cloud WAF Service became readily apparent soon after implementation. We experienced this firsthand through the prompt support we received and the solutions provided to address our most critical security threats.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the monitoring dashboard that we access through the portal.
What needs improvement?
The Cloud Portal has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for around five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of Radware Cloud WAF Service nine out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with Radware support has been positive. Our partnership with them grants us access to privileged customer tools and the customer community. This allows us to utilize valuable resources such as blogs and troubleshooting guides, ensuring we can effectively address any issues that may arise.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The implementation took three years to complete and we had three people involved.
What was our ROI?
We have seen around a 60 percent return on investment from Radware Cloud WAF Service.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Radware Cloud WAF Service falls within a mid-range price bracket compared to other web application firewall solutions.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Radware Cloud WAF Service ten out of ten.
We have around 500 customers utilizing the Radware Cloud WAF Service.
Radware provides a sufficient product that doesn't require maintenance from our end.
For comprehensive cloud and load balancing protection, I highly recommend Radware Cloud WAF Service to all organizations.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
EVP, Chief Digital officer and head of Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Serves as a comprehensive solution for both our current and prospective customers, generating revenue for us
Pros and Cons
- "What makes this a comprehensive offering from Radware is that it combines WAF, ADA, bot management, and API protection, which is not currently available from any other provider in the market."
- "The lower-level technical team at Radware could improve their approach to problem-solving as they sometimes are very slow."
What is our primary use case?
We are a data center company that hosts a variety of applications for our customers. We use these applications for two purposes: internal protection and external customer protection. Currently, all of our internal applications are hosted on the cloud and are safeguarded by the Cloud WAF service. Our customers also use the Cloud WAF service to protect their applications from external threats.
We aim to provide our customers with 99.99 percent infrastructure availability and 99.95 percent service uptime. When we guarantee availability and security, we must ensure we have the strongest security measures in your environment. That is the highest priority for the company.
We've deployed Radware for various applications in our environment. We have also successfully used it in heterogeneous customer environments without any issues. We have some internet-facing applications like SAP and Oracle. Our company has custom Java-based and .NET-based applications. The clients' ERP environments may also be vulnerable because they are the company's heart. We deploy and host many ERP environments and protect them against external attacks.
How has it helped my organization?
Radware Cloud WAF Service's ability to block unknown threats and attacks is useful. Radware Cloud WAF Service's best feature is its ability to protect against and log a wide range of unknown threats as part of its offerings.
I can confidently say that Radware Cloud WAF Service serves as a comprehensive solution for both our current and prospective customers, generating revenue for us. This service guarantees high uptime and availability of all our business applications while reducing overall operational complexity.
Automated event analytics are effective. We have automated event monitoring, which provides us with excellent analytical dashboards that help us identify any issues. These dashboards report, track, monitor, and ultimately resolve the issues. Therefore, the mitigation process is highly effective when utilizing these analytical dashboards.
We implemented API protection as a security measure, which includes an API discovery feature. This feature helps protect APIs from attacks, making it a valuable aspect of Radware Cloud WAF Service.
The API discovery feature provides outstanding end-to-end API protection. APIs play a crucial role in applications, often requiring extensive investigation. Having automated discovery and protection against external threats makes this feature even more exceptional.
API discovery is a user-friendly feature that comes with an automated algorithm. The algorithm detects APIs and generates tailored security policies to identify and log any real-time API FOCA attacks. This makes it an outstanding feature. Additionally, Radware repair protection can access the automated algorithm to discover APIs and create personalized security policies that can detect and prevent API worker attacks in real-time.
The API discovery aided in the reduction of our overhead costs by around 20 percent. The APIs are protected in real-time, which enabled us to decrease operational complexity and costs significantly.
We provide data center services and offer both public and private cloud options to our customers. Our Radware Cloud WAF Service provides comprehensive protection against bots and APIs, safeguarding all the Internet-facing applications hosted on our platform. As a result of implementing this service, our organization has greatly benefited.
The Radware Cloud WAF Service has been instrumental in reducing our false positives by nearly 25 percent. This is due to its comprehensive API protection and bot offerings, which have reduced operational complexity.
The cost of managing the overall solution decreased because we now require fewer personnel. With the tool's significant automation and numerous analytic dashboards, customers now feel more comfortable and have greater peace of mind than before.
I would rate the integration of Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten. This solution has user-friendly integration algorithms and features that make it easy to integrate with other applications. Once we become familiar with the product, the interfaces are straightforward to use. The software has an API, which enables different applications to communicate with each other, making it the best part of the solution. Therefore, API protection is included in the software, allowing applications to interact with each other seamlessly. Consequently, customers can feel more confident when using Radware Cloud WAF Service.
Radware Cloud WAF Service reduced the effort of our IT team, therefore, freeing up their time for other projects.
Radware Cloud WAF Service helped reduce our TCO because we can now offer this service to our customers. This has resulted in generating additional revenue, contributing to the overall cost savings.
After three months of implementing the Radware Cloud WAF Service and selecting the product, we began to see time to value.
What is most valuable?
We have recently upgraded our cloud WAF to Radware Cloud WAF Service to include WAF and ADA protection, as well as watch management and Layer 7. What makes this a comprehensive offering from Radware is that it combines WAF, ADA, bot management, and API protection, which is not currently available from any other provider in the market. The most valuable aspect of our service is its ability to safeguard applications from external threats, including the API. This sets the solution apart from other web operators in the market.
What needs improvement?
The lower-level technical team at Radware could improve their approach to problem-solving as they are sometimes very slow. While the higher management is highly active and supportive, the lower management and staff may take longer to provide support, leading to delays. Proactively improving their response time could enhance their overall performance. Otherwise, customers may need to escalate issues to the higher-ups, which could be avoided.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for over three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is stable. We have not had any performance issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I give Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten for scalability.
Radware Cloud WAF is a cloud-based solution, so it's scalable. We have a 5GB contract and can always increase. If it had been on-premises, Radware would be a less-scalable solution. We can easily add capacity if needed.
How are customer service and support?
We have Radware's ERT premium support which is great.
We signed the highest-level SLA with Radware called ERT Premium Services, which guarantees a five-minute response from Radware 24/7. Radware India also provides support. We call management if we have an issue, and they take care of it. Radware also has an excellent knowledge base and community forums.
A few months ago, we had an attack at night and needed immediate support. I called the director of Radware India, and he immediately lined up the entire support team within a few minutes. They resolved the issue as soon as the ticket entered their system. In five minutes, we got support from the most senior employee of Radware India. When we were implementing the Radware DDoS, the management maintained communication with us and helped us get started fast.
It was the same with the Radware load balancer. We subscribed to the new load balancers, which we needed to provide additional capacity for our company over the next five years, and management was there to guide us in the right direction.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Compared to previous solutions, Radware Cloud WAF Service is a reliable product, especially when combined with senior management support. If we obtain both, such as contacting the senior manager, the Managing Director of Redwood in India, we can expect a response in a matter of minutes. This is the service's greatest advantage.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward because we had the help of the Radware specialists. The implementation strategy involved conducting a brief proof of concept for a few applications within the entire solution. Once the POC was successful, we proceeded to deploy it in the test environment. After testing, we moved it to production within three months.
Our L1, L2, and L3 support, with the assistance of Radware, completed the deployment in five weeks on the back end.
Radware Cloud WAF Service is deployed in the cloud for internal applications hosted on Yotta, as well as for customers who chose to use this service.
The entire deployment took around six weeks, from the planning stage to the final rollout. We deployed the architecture, created the MSSP, configured the links, and created the domain names. We developed the implementation strategy with Radware and its partner. We first deployed the solution for approximately 20 or so internal applications. In phase two, we opened the solution up to customers.
After deployment, Radware WAF doesn't require much maintenance aside from updates and periodic maintenance windows on the vendor side.
What about the implementation team?
Radware's partner helped with the implementation.
What was our ROI?
We experienced a positive return on investment of up to 50 percent, due to our ability to reduce false positives. This led to a significant decrease in the effort required to manage the solution and a reduction in the overall cost of ownership. Additionally, the solution generated revenue from customers as we can now identify and address external threats to their environment. As a result, we also receive renewals. This is the most significant benefit of the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
When compared to Akamai and F5, Radware's pricing and licensing are highly competitive. In fact, Radware offers the best price along with excellent licensing pricing. Moreover, we received ERP premium support as a part of the package, which would otherwise be a service that incurs a high cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We conducted an evaluation of F5 Advanced WAF and Akamai Web Application Protector, both of which performed well. However, the standout feature was Radware's five-minute SLA on their premium ERT support. This evaluation considers three factors: the product, the SLA, and the management support. Radware offers the highest level of ERP payment support with a response time of five minutes. Additionally, if any issues arise, we have the option to escalate to Radware's senior management, and we can expect a response from Radware's MD within a few minutes. When considering the product, SLA, and management support as a whole, we believe that Radware Cloud WAF Service is the best option.
What other advice do I have?
I give Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten.
As of now, we have not had to maintain the solution.
I recommend Radware Cloud WAF Service for any organization which wants to be free from external threats.
A year ago, people were only talking about the WAF application firewall. Today, we refer to WAAP, which provides increased protection against threats and vulnerabilities. Radware came out with this innovative offering called WAAP, including, WAF, API and bot protection, and DDoS. This is an innovative solution. If you want peace of mind, Cloud WAF is a one-stop shop for your security needs. Radware WAAP is a comprehensive security solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
CISO at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The interface is easy to use, and the solution protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats
Pros and Cons
- "Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website."
- "They've changed their process for call logging. I suppose it's fine, but I used to be able to send emails in. They could also build up more local resiliency here in South Africa. They're working on that, so it isn't much of an issue now."
What is our primary use case?
We have several web applications in various environments. Some are hosted on-prem or Azure and others are hosted at different locations or by business partners. Cloud WAF provides centralized control over the security of those web applications.
How has it helped my organization?
Cloud WAF protects us against all DDoS attacks, improving our resiliency and security. It has multiple security feature sets we use, such as OWASP Top Ten Protection. Radware lets us switch assets quite quickly. It fronts web applications, so we can redirect the traffic to a different page if the backend web application goes down. For instance, if we have an outage in our web form, we can redirect that from the Radware side to an Azure website instead of giving the user a "Page cannot be displayed."
Cloud WAF gives us greater visibility. We sometimes get calls from clients who say they're getting an error. We can use Cloud WAF to discover the error generated and troubleshoot any bad behavior. Radware flagged some attacks from China where an attacker attempted to capture traffic. If you go look at the raw code coming in, you can see some suspicious characters being injected into legitimate traffic.
I can't say if our false positives decreased because we previously had no WAF protection. Information was stored in the IPS signatures or IAS logs, but we weren't ingesting those to look for anything interesting. Cloud WAF has given us more visibility than we had before.
Our only integration is pulling the telemetry out into our scene. We use the API to pull the data in. The only other integration piece, if you want to call it that, is using the generic error that they present to a client to troubleshoot client experience problems. We don't integrate much aside from those two.
I can't say that we saved time because we weren't using anything before Radware, but we don't spend much time configuring the solution. They're doing a lot of analytics in the background. We followed a process before we onboarded Radware where we put the solution in Learning Mode to see if there was anything interesting or any default conflict changes we needed to make. We mostly left it alone after that.
It would likely take us around 15 to 20 percent more time to support the infrastructure ourselves. We would need a human to install updates and patches, but Radware manages all of that.
What is most valuable?
DDoS protection was the critical feature we wanted when we decided to go with Radware. The company faced many DDoS attacks at the time, and we didn't have a solution. It's not the only reason we chose Cloud WAF. We do use it for other use cases.
Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website.
The solution protects against multiple threat types. We see SQL injection attacks and DDoS probes constantly. Attackers attempt multiple queries and enumeration attacks against our applications. We previously had a basic firewall with an IPS feature set, but it wasn't providing the same level of protection we get from the WAF.
CloudWAF matches things automatically and identifies any threats. It seems to be doing its job. We sometimes have strange code-related behavior. When our developers write some poorly written code, it generates events in Cloud WAF. It's generally effective at detecting. We had an issue with a misconfigured rule where it blocked legitimate traffic. Overall, we haven't had many issues with it in the last three years. We leave it alone.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have used Cloud WAF for about three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Cloud WAF is a highly stable product. We have only had two outages in four years. One was an update that they pushed out, and the other was a problem with the DDoS mitigation.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We only have about 15 websites, but Radware can scale because it's a cloud service. We've probably seen around 100,000 to 200,000 simultaneous users, and we're pushing more and more people through to it. Our clients vary in size, but the bulk of our business consists of small and medium-sized retailers.
How are customer service and support?
I rate Radware support an eight out of ten. I recommend buying the extended support, which we didn't purchase when we first signed up. We see a noticeable benefit from extended support in terms of response times.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Cloud WAF was straightforward, and Radware helped us when needed. Deploying everything took around a week, but we're a risk-averse company. We took our time before sending all the traffic through. We started with a few low-hanging fruit websites because we didn't know the tech, so it took us two months. The business stakeholders said we needed to test it with the less-critical websites for two months to ensure we had no issues. After that, we onboarded the main website.
My team deployed it. Cloud WAF is a hosted environment in two POPs in South Africa, and we buy the service. The service flows from there through to websites that sit on-premises or in other locations. After deployment, we don't need to do much on there. We only need to investigate events if we see something. Maintenance includes adding and removing users from the console due to company turnover. We also change certificates when they expire.
What was our ROI?
Calculating the return on investment is hard, but we've reduced our risks. When we implemented Radware, South Africa was facing a wave of DDoS attacks that primarily targeted financial services, but we weren't concerned because we had DDoS protection.
We don't need a dedicated person to manage it. It's a hands-off service that alerts us if they pick up something. They do lots of additional monitoring for us, like if there is trouble on the back end and any of our sites go down. That frees us up a lot.
Our company started with nothing, so we realized instant value from the service. It starts providing protection immediately, and the assets that Cloud WAF protects need 100 percent uptime. We lose money if our sites go down because clients can't complete transactions.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I think Cloud WAF is fairly priced, but the pricing model is a bit weird. It's modular. You buy Radware WAF, but DDoS and bot protection are bolt-on features. I would prefer to buy it as one complete package because bundles are usually cheaper than three standalone products.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We also looked at Cloudflare. Radware stood out because we are in South Africa, and the rest of the world is far away. The latency is too high if we host anything in Europe, so we needed something based in our country.
Otherwise, we would need our own infrastructure. We would have to buy three devices and support that. Radware was the only vendor with a presence in our country, which made the decision easy.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten. We're pleased with the solution. If you plan to implement Cloud WAF, my advice for Radware and any cloud service is to know your SLA. Radware offers many extra services in its SLA on top of standard services. The SLA is an insurance policy if you need to call someone to check on things. Radware support has been incredibly responsive. Their monitoring team has gone above and beyond. They notify us when our websites fail, but they don't need to.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Mar 2, 2026
Flag as inappropriateSharon-LevinCustomer Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Top 5LeaderboardReal User
Hi, As to the comment regarding the pricing model - in 2023 our Cloud Application Protection services pricing model has been changed and simplified.
We now offer only three plans to choose from: Standard, Advanced, and Complete
Each plan is designed to cater to different cybersecurity needs and risk exposure, as well as different levels of managed services.
Please feel free to contact us to learn more
CIO at Bibliothèque nationale du Quebec
Helps reduce false positives, free up IT time, and block unknown threats
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Radware Cloud WAF Service is the visibility into attacks that are being cut off instantly."
- "It would be ideal if Radware could offer a bundled package that includes Cloud WAF, web DDoS protection, bot manager, and Alteon for a more comprehensive security solution."
What is our primary use case?
After a security breach on one of our web applications, we transitioned to a cloud-based web application firewall solution. We chose Radware Cloud WAF Service to protect our critical web applications.
How has it helped my organization?
I would rate Radware Cloud WAF Service's ability to block unknown threats and attacks as nine out of ten.
Radware Cloud WAF Service initially operated in a learning mode for the first week after deployment, gathering data. Once it switched to action mode, we began to experience the service's full benefits.
Cloud WAF has helped reduce our false positives by 20 percent.
We have implemented Cloud WAF in conjunction with Alteon, and we are currently integrating a bot manager and web application DDoS protection. The integration was easy because we were accompanied by Radware.
Cloud WAF has helped free up our IT team for other projects.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Radware Cloud WAF Service is the visibility into attacks that are being cut off instantly.
What needs improvement?
It would be ideal if Radware could offer a bundled package that includes Cloud WAF, web DDoS protection, bot manager, and Alteon for a more comprehensive security solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for two and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is scalable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service met our scaling requirements.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is great. I have nothing bad to say about them.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment process went smoothly and was completed in three weeks by a five-person team consisting of two representatives from our organization and three from Radware.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is fair. We pay for what we need.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
After evaluating Radware Cloud WAF Service against other options and confirming its leading position in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for Web Application Firewalls, we chose it for our web security needs.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Radware Cloud WAF Service nine out of ten.
No maintenance is required on our end.
Radware Cloud WAF Service does what is expected and reduces the number of attacks on our web applications.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Cloud Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
A plug-and-play solution with a minimal learning curve that offers good visibility into attacks
Pros and Cons
- "With the current visibility dashboard, we can now obtain insight into the nature of attacks, identify attackers, and detect top IP or threat regions."
- "Radware Cloud WAF Service has limited integrations, and I would like to see it integrate with our use of Azure DevOps."
What is our primary use case?
Initially, all our services were on-premises, but we decided to move many of them to the Azure cloud to make them accessible to our customers. However, we discovered that certain attacks were going undetected and the native tools in Azure cloud were inadequate for protecting against them. As a result, our expenses were increasing due to resource exhaustion. To address this issue, we consulted with our vendors and found a Cloud WAF hardware solution. Once we implemented Radware Cloud WAF Service and combined it with application controls, bot protection, and DDoS services, our expenses were reduced by 80 percent. This was a remarkable achievement.
How has it helped my organization?
I report every month on any incidents involving our public assets. One particular use case that I focus on is geo attacks, which help identify who is attempting to access these resources from locations outside of our Southeast US customer base. This helps reduce unnecessary noise. We also have private APIs that are only accessible to specific vendors, and it's important to secure them with an access list. Although it is a basic measure, it allows me to monitor who is attempting to access those resources. The unknown threat aspect of it is not a frequent occurrence.
Radware Cloud WAF Service provides excellent automated analytics for event analysis. Its visibility feature alone is a selling point for the product. When we initially invest in cloud services, it can be difficult to monitor activity. We only receive a bill indicating increased CPU and RAM usage. The analytics provided by Radware Cloud WAF Service has been extremely helpful in this regard.
Radware Cloud WAF Service has significantly reduced our Azure bill by filtering out unnecessary CPU, compute, and bandwidth usage on the front end. Previously, we experienced a lot of errors and serious issues due to APIs being exposed, and our developers could not always understand why these errors occurred. However, once we implemented Radware Cloud WAF Service, it significantly reduced the noise and eliminated malicious data. As a result, our developer logs now look good, and we can identify who is targeting us and their intentions through the provided metrics. It has been incredibly helpful from a management perspective as we can present them with dashboard metrics showing how the tool is blocking and protecting us. They appreciate this information.
Radware Cloud WAF Service has helped reduce our false positives by 90 percent.
We quickly recognized the value of the Radware Cloud WAF Service upon deployment. However, we needed to ensure that the business owners understood the changes being made. Upon activating the spot protection and geolocation service, we noticed a significant decrease in illegitimate traffic. Prior to the implementation, we were receiving an overwhelming amount of hits, averaging between 150,000 to 160,000 per hour on certain pages. Once the services were activated, this number decreased to only 2,000 to 3,000 hits per hour, indicating that a majority of the previous traffic was not legitimate. This allowed us to reduce our footprint in Azure and do so immediately. It is evident that the internet is filled with a vast amount of illegitimate traffic, with many individuals scanning for open services. The implementation of Radware Cloud WAF Service helped eliminate this issue within a day.
What is most valuable?
Before the introduction of Azure cloud-native tools, monitoring visibility was inadequate, making it difficult to identify the cause of resource attacks. With the current visibility dashboard, we can now obtain insight into the nature of attacks, identify attackers, and detect top IP or threat regions. This dashboard has proven to be helpful in improving our ability to identify and respond to attacks.
What needs improvement?
Radware Cloud WAF Service has significantly reduced the number of attacks and improved our visibility. However, there are some areas where it could improve its maturity. Previously, the interface, Bot manager, and Cloud WAF were separate interfaces, but they have now been merged into one dashboard. However, the current setup is somewhat cumbersome, and there is room for improvement in this area.
Radware Cloud WAF Service has limited integrations, and I would like to see it integrate with our use of Azure DevOps. Specifically, I would like it to be able to automatically detect and protect new APIs and changes made to existing ones, utilizing the API discovery and protection features. Currently, there is no integration for this. If we use a SIM, we can receive email alerts or check the dashboard for information on the types of attacks, but this is not an ideal or modern approach to alerting. It would be beneficial for the service to integrate with top enterprise tools like SIEM, allowing for more efficient and effective alerting and logging. Unfortunately, there are currently no native tie-ins for some of the products we use, requiring us to set up email notifications to our SIM. Therefore, integrating with enterprise tools for alerting and SIM purposes would be greatly appreciated.
I wish to have improved integrations with larger vendor tools, such as alerting systems or SIMs, to enable us to pull and query performance metrics for analysis. As a fairly large organization, we require a tool that can consolidate data from multiple applications into a single location for better visibility and decision-making. Unfortunately, we are currently unable to extract this data into any of our existing systems.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have only experienced one outage with Radware Cloud WAF Service in the past two years, so I would say that it is very reliable and stable.
How are customer service and support?
The interfaces have significantly improved, but we had numerous queries about their functionalities and how to enable specific capabilities for monitoring purposes. We had to spend a considerable amount of time trying to understand the process, such as what we needed to turn on and how to turn it on, as well as interpreting the log entries. As a result, we had to contact support multiple times, which involved a lot of back and forth. Additionally, during certain periods, our services were targeted by heavy DDoS attacks, and we had to rely on support heavily to mitigate them. There were a few instances where we had to request significant assistance from support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we utilized Azure Application Gateway, which included a built-in WAF capability. However, due to its cumbersome nature and limited capabilities, approximately 10 percent of Radware Cloud WAF Service, we switched to Radware. Azure CloudApp lacked reporting functionality, making it difficult for us to identify attack sources, methods, and user agents.
In comparison to Azure Application Gateway, Radware Cloud WAF Service has the ability to detect all types of attacks. While using Azure, there were a few attacks that utilized a unique combination of user agent strengths which Azure Cloud WAF was unable to detect. Due to limitations in the user registry and signature attack type, it could not comprehend how to prevent these attacks. Therefore, we opted to switch to Radware Cloud WAF Service, which was better suited to meet our security needs.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Cloud WAF was straightforward, but the bot protection was a bit of a mess initially. When the product was first launched, separate dashboards were provided for both services, giving the impression that they had separate support from the company. However, over the last two years, they have been consolidated into a single dashboard, making deployment and management much easier. Despite the initial difficulty with bot protection, Cloud WAF was ultimately easy to deploy. We required two people for the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was completed in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Radware provides same features and coverage as competitors for a significant discount.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We assessed Citrix Web App and Imperva DDoS, and Microsoft urged us to test their latest version of Cloud WAF. However, we declined their offer and instead opted for Radware Cloud WAF Service because it was effortless to implement. We were able to turn it on and have it working on the same day without requiring extensive integration, which was necessary for the other options we considered. We preferred a plug-and-play solution with a minimal learning curve. Radware Cloud WAF Service met these requirements and has been functioning well.
What other advice do I have?
I give Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten.
We are interested in utilizing the API discovery feature, but since we frequently make changes to our APIs using a DevOps pipeline, our APIs change on a regular basis, almost every two weeks. Our company's current goal is automation, and all changes to the environments must be done through a coded pipeline with variables. Unfortunately, the API discovery feature may slow down our automation capabilities, making it difficult to push changes every two weeks unless the interface is improved. While we would like to take advantage of the API mapping and different attack techniques, we cannot use the feature until it becomes more mature and integrated with our automated pipeline.
We deploy the solution across one location.
The ability to log in and review data and logs is a crucial feature for me when choosing a Cloud WAF. While most services have similar capabilities, the differentiator lies in how well they can parse and present the data. I had trouble with Citrix as it was difficult to obtain and interpret the data to prevent attacks. However, Imperva has an excellent interface for pulling data, which helps us make informed decisions. Radware stood out as the best in both areas, with their dashboard being user-friendly and responsive. The implementation was also straightforward as all the necessary information was readily available. It only took a few hours to set up a new site, making it easy to go live quickly.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Feb 20, 2026
Flag as inappropriateSystem Administrator at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Is user-friendly, helps save time, and has good end-to-end API protection
Pros and Cons
- "Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy."
- "Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers."
What is our primary use case?
We have multiple use cases for Radware Cloud WAF Service. We use it to protect our voice domain, our banking solution, and any other applications that are open to the Internet. We use the same Radware WAF for our applications on AWS.
How has it helped my organization?
The effectiveness of Radware Cloud WAF Service in blocking unknown threats and attacks depends on the situation. Usually, when we deploy applications, we have everything planned in advance. In this case, we can simply log in to the portal and configure the WAF. However, if we are dealing with a repeated case or if we need to update a certificate, we can use automation to make the changes. In most cases, we do not need to make any changes to the WAF configuration. For example, if we need to block a specific IP address, we can create a template and apply it to all of our web applications. This allows us to use WAF for both web applications and API code.
Radware Cloud WAF Service's automated analytics for looking at events is good. We actually had something similar before, but this service gives us a better understanding of how we use WAF for different products. For example, DDoS protection is also included. This allows me to analyze which users are coming from which locations, what my status is, and if I have a SQL injection or something similar. There are a lot of features, so I definitely know my application better and can identify any security events that are happening on my web or application.
The end-to-end API protection offered by Radware Cloud WAF Service's API discovery feature is a good tool. However, it can only be effective if we understand the WAF portal concept and know what the tool does. Before we use the tool, we should read its documentation. Radware also has a universal university where we can learn more about how Radware works in a web application. This is helpful because different vendors have different ways of using the same application. I have been part of this learning experience and found it to be very helpful.
API Discovery is easy to use for those who are familiar with WAFs and APIs. However, we need to use a document to configure it, which is not a big deal.
Using Radware CDN services and Cloud WAF together is easy. However, it requires coordination between two different teams. The security team is responsible for CDN, while the development team is responsible for the application. If these teams communicate effectively, it is very easy to use the combined services. Even if the development team does not have experience with CDN, it is not difficult to learn. I have been part of both teams, and I can confirm that using Radware CDN services and Cloud WAF together is easy.
Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly. It provides us with what we need and tells us where to click. Even if we are new to using it, we will not get lost or confused. Once we log in, we can simply click through the steps and understand what is happening. The application is easy to configure and does not require highly technical knowledge.
Radware Cloud WAF Service helped reduce the overhead on one team. In a previous product preview event, only two teams were configuring everything for the project team. However, now even the user developer can develop applications. They develop the application, put their endpoint, and go to Radware to create everything. The system management and network teams are no longer involved. This reduced the dependency on a team by 70 percent. Additionally, any individual team can now configure and use the service.
Radware Cloud WAF Service helped reduce our TCO by ten percent.
We noticed the time to value within two months of using Radware Cloud WAF Service.
What is most valuable?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy. All we need is our domain name, and we can easily configure it. I migrated from old products to new products using Radware Cloud WAF Service. Migration can be a complex process, but Radware makes it easy by providing a step-by-step guide. We can migrate one application at a time, or we can migrate multiple applications at once. Radware also provides an API that we can use to automate the migration process.
What needs improvement?
Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers. Currently, customers must purchase an external certificate and upload it to their hardware. This is a major inconvenience, and I would like to see Radware offer a certificate solution.
The technical support has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is scalable. We have multiple teams but we are all on one cloud. We have approximately 50 people using Radware Cloud WAF Service.
How are customer service and support?
Overall, the technical support team resolves our issues, but they take some time to understand the issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Imperva Web Application Firewall, but it was too expensive. We switched to the Radware Cloud WAF Service, which is more affordable.
We did not use the automation with Imperva in the same way that we do with Radware Cloud.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took one month because we wanted Radware to learn about our footprint. We started blocking after a month, once they developed an algorithm to understand how the application works and what the major use cases are. Initially, we were not in a blocking mode. We were just configuring everything and learning more about the application. We initially required six people because we were building the policies.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was completed in-house.
What was our ROI?
We are still in the early stages of using Radware Cloud WAF Service, but we have already seen a 10 percent return on investment due to a reduction in team dependency.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For the current market, the price for Radware Cloud WAF Service is exactly where we want it to be.
We are using two services, WAF and CDN, and we have a three-year contract for these services.
What other advice do I have?
I give Radware Cloud WAF Service an eight out of ten.
I recommend conducting a proof of concept before purchasing Radware Cloud WAF Service.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Radware Cloud WAF Service Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2026
Product Categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF)Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Imperva Application Security Platform
Fortinet FortiWeb
Azure Front Door
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)
Akamai App and API Protector
F5 Advanced WAF
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Aikido Security
F5 Distributed Cloud Services
Radware Alteon
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Radware Cloud WAF Service Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which lesser known firewall product has the best chance at unseating the market leaders?
- Which WAF solution would you recommend to cater to 100 to 125 concurrent sessions?
- What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
- Fortinet vs Sophos? Help choose a NGFW solution that can replace Microsoft TMG.
- Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
- F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
- When should companies use SSL Inspection?
- How does a WAF help to protect against DDoS attacks?
- NGFW with URL Filtering vs Web Proxy
- What's right for me? Fortinet or Citrix?


















Radware excels at blocking unknown threats and attacks through its behavioral-based detection and machine learning capabilities. legitimate traffic patterns over time, allowing it to detect anomalies and mitigate zero-day attacks without relying on static signatures. encrypted attacks effectively by inspecting SSL traffic without compromising performance.