Rapid7 InsightVM Reviews

It's a vulnerability scanning tool utilized within the vulnerability management process. We employ it to conduct internal vulnerability assessments of company or organizational host IPs.

It aids in enhancing the overall security posture within our organization. It uncovered numerous vulnerabilities that had been overlooked, which was quite beneficial.

The most valuable features are its reporting capabilities and the host discovery functionality.

The primary issue I encountered initially with this tool was related to configuration. There is a significant learning curve, that non-technical individuals, especially those not specialized in computer science or the information security industry, might face.

I have been working with it for six months.

I am satisfied with the stability provided.

The initial setup went smoothly, but after completing it, I encountered difficulties when attempting to use features like the dashboard and the scan now option. Specifically, I faced challenges with scanning the host, which proved to be quite frustrating.

The initial setup wasn't overly difficult, so it took me around one to two days due to troubleshooting issues. Overall deployment took about two to three days in total.

I highly recommend Rapid7 as my experience with it is very positive. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for scanning. It will support the agent and collect scanning information on particular hotspots. 

We like that you can create your own inputs using the chat.

The integration capabilities are good.

It has good reporting.

We can create our own templates.

The dashboard is very easy to use for customers. 

The firewall could be better.

We've had struggles with new scanning on Cisco routers. We have to do a lot of troubleshooting. The authentication scan is not working. 

We'd like better risk levels for assets in terms of reporting. 

I've been using the solution since 2019. I've only used it for a few years at this point. 

The solution is quite stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. I'd rate the stability eight out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. It offers pretty high scalability. I'd rate it nine out of ten. 

Our clients are medium to large-scale businesses. 

The initial setup is very easy. It is very customizable and easy to understand. 

I'm not sure how long the deployment took. The POC took about 30 days to allow the clients to try it out. We requested a POC to test out some use cases. 

I'm a reseller. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. It might be version six or seven. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. 

Our company uses the solution to discover, identify, and patch vulnerabilities or disable certain services. The solution provides the patch recommendations that we implement via another tool. 

Four team members manage the solution internally and for various clients who each have fifty users. 

The solution helps to identify lots of misconfigurations, flaws, or security risks. Anything insecure is exposed easily. 

The solution is automatically scheduled so it runs by itself. 

The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools. Rapid7 is the solution's own threat intelligence platform but third-party platforms would be a great addition. 

It would be nice to have patching capabilities built within the solution rather than using third-party products. 

I have been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is extremely stable. 

The solution is easily scalable with the purchase of additional licenses. 

Technical support is extremely good and we get support quite fast. Technical support is rated a ten out of ten. 

Positive

The setup is very straightforward so I rate it a ten out of ten. 

We implement the solution for customers. 

The solution is a bit more reasonably priced than other products. 

Most products in this category are similar with no real difference so it all comes down to price. 

It is important to have a strong patch management plan that prioritizes what and how you need to patch. 

The solution does the vast majority of work but you need a proper system so you can take output to your operations team for patching. A good workflow between teams is important. 

I rate the solution a ten out of ten. 

We use Rapid7 InsightVM to increase vulnerability scanning, which is why we tried Qualys as well.

This solution's most useful feature is that it is entirely a single-page application.

The UI is both professional and user-friendly.

The drawback is that it is still not a fully SaaS solution, so you have to deploy a console.

I have been working with Rapid7 InsightVM for six weeks.

Rapid7 InsightVM is stable.

Rapid7 InsightVM is a scalable solution.

We have two dedicated technicians to assist us.

We are also testing Qualys. If you look at both options, I believe they are the same. Both are in the top market leader position.

Both tools have the same features. The most essential consideration in choosing one of those two experiences with it and whether it fits inside your business.

I can't decide, we are still in the comparison phases.

It is very easy to set up.

It can be deployed in a matter of weeks.

It is pretty expensive. It depends on what you consider pricey, however, if you only look at vulnerability management solutions, such as within VM or VMDR, there are, I suppose the prices are almost the same. But I believe you will discover that for yourself.

Experiment with it and gain some experience with it.

I would rate Rapid7 InsightVM an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for vulnerability management and monitoring the progress of the remediation process.

The remediation feature has been quite useful. 

It's easy to set up the solution. 

It's stable.

The solution scales well.

The solution isn't missing any features, and I haven't noticed any shortcomings. 

There was functionality present previously, however, currently, we can't integrate directly with Jira Service Desk - only the cloud version. That, or we must share to the internet on-prem Jira Service Desk. It's not easy for us since we use only the on-prem Service Desk service, and we don't straight to the internet for our service.

InsightVM can only directly connect to the internet. So, we can't use this integration and send tasks to our technical team from InsightVM. We, therefore, need better integration with Jira Service Desk. 

The stability has been good overall. I would rate it five out of five in terms of reliability. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is suitable for big or small organizations. We have clients of different sizes using the product. 

It's used at the engineering level, with security and administrators using it regularly.

I'd rate it five out of five in terms of the ease of scaling. 

The solution is straightforward to set up. I'd rate it four out of five in terms of ease of implementation. 

We have one or two team members that can set up the solution. 

How long it takes to deploy depends on the customer. For a small customer, it's less than one month or sometimes two weeks. For a big customer with many assets and services, it takes two or three months to deploy.

We only need to have one or two people on hand to handle maintenance tasks. 

The solution is not overly expensive.

We use this solution for our clients.

We're dealing with the latest version of the product.

InsightVM is a solution based on on-prem infrastructure connected to the cloud service, so it's a hybrid solution.

Overall, it's a nice tool. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

A big vulnerability was discovered last year for jshell. We got a lot of questions from our customers about which services are vulnerable. We could give an answer in just a few minutes to the customers and also warn them.

The risk score that they provide makes it easier to find out the biggest risks. It helped the security officers to understand where the biggest risks are so that they can act on them. They can instruct their IT teams to give them a higher priority and mitigate them.

It is still not a fully cloud-based solution. It will be helpful for customers if it is a complete cloud solution. It is a hybrid solution at the moment.

I have been working with this solution for two years. It is a cloud solution, and I have been using its latest version.

It is definitely stable.

It is made for scalability. We use it to monitor our own company with 250 users. Day-to-day, three people are monitoring the environment.

It is perfect. I would rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

It was straightforward. It took a couple of hours. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of ease of setup.

In terms of maintenance, it is all self-updating.

It is difficult to estimate the ROI. For our management, it is a really important tool. It helps us to understand if something is not going perfectly. 

Its licensing is yearly. Everything is included in the price for one year.

We checked other solutions. We went for it because it has a cloud platform inside, which integrates with our SIEM solution, and it has many more capabilities than other products.

I would advise others to make sure that every asset in the environment is monitored by the tool. I see many customers who think they have full coverage of all assets, but they are missing a part of the network. In such a case, they will get an incorrect understanding of their security.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for vulnerability management.

From a scanning perspective, it’s great. The customization associated with each and every scan is very good. It actually provides functionality from a CIS control perspective as well.

It is easy to deploy.

The product is scalable.

The solution is very stable.

The reporting could be better.

We do not need any additional features.

I’ve been using the solution for two years.

The solution is very stable. The reliability is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze.

The solution is absolutely scalable.

From a footprint perspective, there are about 780 servers. In totality, there's a license entitlement for about 1000 clients.

Technical support has been accurate.

Neutral

The solution is straightforward to set up and simple to deploy. It’s not overly complex. We only need one technical person to handle the setup process.

How long it takes to deploy depends on multiple instances whereby multiple factors, depending on client, on-prem, et cetera. Your average deployment time would be anything from three to five days.

As partners, we can handle the implementation.

The ROI is fair to mild.

The licensing is market-related.

The cost depends on the number of assets per annum.

It is very flexible. What's nice about it is, from a client's perspective, the environment can either grow and you can chew up, or it can shrink, and it meets whatever needs you have.

The licensing includes technical support.

We’re partners.

We’re always using the latest version of the solution.

There's a mix of deployments. There's an on-prem deployment in certain customer areas. However, there's also a cloud deployment from the MSSV point of view as well.

The scanner is always on-prem. The majority of the scanners that we've deployed are on-prem. Although some of the consoles are selling cloud-deployed, other consoles would be on-prem.

I’d rate the solution seven out of ten.

InsightVM is mainly used for vulnerability management.

InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine. It can be customized according to the customer's needs - for example, if they have an asset that is more vulnerable, they can adjust the risk score according to their infrastructure. It also has a very robust dashboard system and good integration.

InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option. They could also introduce license packages for fewer than 128 users for smaller organizations.

I've been using InsightVM for almost five years.

InsightVM is stable.

InsightVM has the option of implementing the scan engine separately, which helps with scalability.

InsightVM's technical support is very good.

Positive

InsightVM is easy to implement and deploy, even for small and medium businesses.

InsightVM's licensing starts at a minimum of 128 IPs and can scale up to over 1,000.

InsightVM is easy to use, has a well-defined dashboard, and can be customized according to your needs. You can also segregate your assets and define IP ranges. I would give InsightVM a rating of nine out of ten.