SAP Cloud Platform Reviews

We use the product for process integration, data integration, etc.

The product provides native integration to enterprise resource planning software. It becomes easier for customers to leverage the product instead of developing or writing integration from the beginning.

The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products.

We have been using SAP Cloud Platform Integration for 20 years.

The product is very stable. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.

We have enterprise businesses as our customers for SAP Cloud Platform Integration. The product is highly scalable. I rate its scalability a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is simple enough. I rate the process an eight or nine out of ten.

SAP Cloud Platform Integration is an expensive product. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten.

I recommend SAP Cloud Platform Integration to others and rate it a seven out of ten.

SAP Cloud platform is primarily used as an overall cloud solution for enterprise.

SAP Cloud Platform's most valuable features are its exhaustiveness, scalability with minimum maintenance, and functionality.

The addition of more industry use cases would be an improvement. SAP could also try to make it more open-source, which would encourage community growth among developers, product owners, and the support team.

I've been working with SAP Cloud Platform for over three years.

SAP Cloud Platform is stable.

SAP's technical support sometimes takes longer to respond.

Neutral

The initial setup was pretty easy.

SAP Cloud Platform offers a good ROI for large enterprises.

SAP offers yearly, subscription-based, and pay-as-you-use licensing.

I'd give SAP Cloud Platform a rating of eight out of ten.

The use case of this product varies according to the customer's needs, but we generally implement it when a customer is looking for a complete SaaS-based model without the need for infrastructure. It saves them from having to take care of any facilities including a data center, redundancy layers, and administration. We are resellers and I'm a service architect. 

The dashboard gives pretty good clarity of what's happening and what needs to be done.

SAP offers very little flexibility in its licensing structure. That said, most of our customers are okay with the price points and we have closed about 50 mid-sized customers with SAP Cloud Platform.

The solution is stable. 

This is an SaaS based model, so scalability is fine. 

The initial setup is straightforward. In terms of maintenance, we operate on a model of shared services so there is no set number of people involved. It changes depending on the need. 

Licensing costs are reasonable and based on the space you're purchasing. There is an annual license fee. 

There are several companies with products in this area and each one has its own unique structure and features, so it's difficult to compare them. It's a matter of choosing the one best suited to your needs.

I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

I'm an integration architect, so I'm involved in implementations.

The pre-delivered content from the SAP cloud platform is definitely a strength. They are doing it, but it's still not a fully mature solution yet. So it's good for some business cases, but not for all of them.

The main problem is that there aren't any easy migrations from SAP PO to SAP CPI, so from process orchestration to cloud platform integration. The connectivity requirements, not only with the SAP environment but also with third party systems, are not fully fulfilled. The re-uses of the know-how from the process orchestration can be used but aren't fully used.

I have been using this solution for five years.

Technical support is good.

The setup of subclasses for integration is very easy. It's the cloud version, so they give you a username and password and it's done.

I was the consultant.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10. 

I think it has room for improvement. They are doing it, but it's still not a fully mature solution yet. It's good for some business cases but not all of them.

We primarily use Cloud Platform for marketing and promotions campaigns, AI, and database integration.

I'd like to see more local integration.

I've been using SAP Cloud Platform for two years.

Cloud Platform's stability is great.

SAP technical support is excellent.

We have a yearly license.

I rate SAP Cloud Platform nine out of 10. 

I run all of my servers on SAP at the moment. We have our development, our quality, and also our production sites on it.

We actually upgraded this solution in December 2020, so we're using the most current version. We're looking forward to incorporating SAP analytics within our company.

The ability to expand it whenever required has been great — it's very simple. The performance is good as well. We haven't experienced any issues yet. 

I have been using SAP Cloud Platform for four years. 

The cost when it comes to monitoring can be difficult. We have to be very, very careful and aware of any changes so the price won't go up too much.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight. 

We primarily use the solution for ERP purposes. We cover finance, research and development, program management, and HR.

At the moment the most valuable aspects of the solution are the project management and finance features. 

The CPS is very good.

It's suitable for various sizes of companies. I have used it with big companies and with small ones as well. 

The BI design is simple compared to other SAP products.

For our organization, the price is the main downside. They should work to reduce the cost. This specifically affects small companies who would like to use it.

The solution should work to simplify its offering to make it more consumable for users, especially new users.

The solution requires more flexibility overall.

I understand that in the future, they will be offering open source ERP, which will be quite useful.

I have been using SAP for 25 years now.

The stability is quite good. There are always bugs and issues to resolve, but in terms of impacting the business, I haven't noticed much.

We have about 300 people using the solution currently. Starting from where we did, at 100 users, all the way up to 300 users, we haven't scaled much. If a company scales up to 5,000 I don't know what will happen. We haven't tried to make that jump.

The BI design is used every day. The cloud platform is used for the special developments we have, so we use it often as well.

We've been in touch with technical support. They are pretty good. I'd rate them 3.5 out of five. They aren't perfect, and could be improved, but overall they are okay.

We have previously used different solutions. We've used Microsoft products where they create more capabilities more frequently, and we've used Google's platform. Google is similar to SAP in that it's more scalable and easy to consume. We've also used Oracle, which is very similar.

In comparison to other SAP offerings, the solution is quite simple. There is no technical installation so you just consume it readily. However, the business configuration can take up to a year depending on a company's complexity. In our case, it took seven months.

In terms of maintenance, the work is done by SAP, so it's a real low-maintenance solution for clients. For the responsibilities that the customer has to perform on their side, however, they might need one person. 

There were many teams involved in the implementation, including program management services and SAP partners. We didn't completely handle the installation ourselves.

We're SAP customers.

We're using the latest version of the solution.

I'd advise other companies to do an assessment with their internal employees or internal functional heads before jumping into any solution. It shouldn't be just one person doing the assessment. They should all do it together and select the product collectively.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The primary use case of this solution is basically for reporting and analysis. We publish our internal data for our clients and also for our management team.

The most valuable feature is integration. The integration with multiple other tools and our data allows us to perform analytics and our reporting requirements.

One thing that can be improved is the way the license is set up. If it could be defined by specific types of users then it would be better. For example, if it could be divided into three different sections, one for management who don't require the analytic work, it could be more for viewing. Another could be for the design department, which would require more specific tools, and finally, developers for the architecture. Different types of licenses would be very good. 

In the next release, I would like to see improvements with the price and the licensing. We are struggling with our vendors to find out who did the tool implementation.

I have been using this solution for eight months.

The solution is stable. We have experienced some issues but that was a problem with our internet, causing the server to go down, and it had nothing to do with the product.

We have no issues with the scalability of this solution.

We have 100 users.

I would rate my experience with technical support a four out of five.

The initial setup was not easy, nor would I say that it was difficult to execute. 

I have yet to explore all of the features.

I would suggest completing a POC before purchasing this solution, or any other solution. Then, going ahead with it once the requirements have been satisfied.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.