It's used to protect files that leave the company, providing redaction and full control. The main purpose is data protection.
There are several tools for internal data protection, but we use Seclore to protect data when it leaves the company.
Automatically protects any files placed within a designated folder, simplifying data protection and ensure continuous data control
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The hot folder feature is the most valuable feature of Seclore for safeguarding communications.
For example, if an unauthorized user gets access to a file, you can remove their access even if they've forwarded it to someone else.
The hot folder feature creates a parent folder that automatically protects any files placed within it.
Additionally, when policies are created for third-party applications, files downloaded from them are automatically protected. For instance, pharmaceutical companies generate many files from third-party applications, and Seclore can automatically protect them.
What needs improvement?
In future releases, I would like to see new features or more connectors for specific applications.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with it for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service and support by Seclore are really good. They're responsive and always ready for troubleshooting.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Forcepoint and GTB don't have IRM features.
Seclore has IRM, the hot folder, and third-party application features.
MIP (Microsoft) has IRM, but they don't have a hot folder feature.
Seclore doesn't have any AI capabilities. IRM tools, in general, don't have any AI capabilities.
How was the initial setup?
The implementation part might be complex, but it's handled by Seclore's support team.
I haven't experienced any complexity. You only need one working server, a policy server to manage policies, and a lightweight agent.
What about the implementation team?
Only one person is needed for implementation, and support is provided for the first year.
It is easy to maintain. One person is enough for maintenance as well.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's a flexible scheme that can be adjusted based on the client's budget.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.
