Top 10 SwiftStack [EOL] Alternatives

Name: SwiftStack [EOL]
Brand: NVIDIA
Rating: 4.3 (8 reviews)

Vendor: NVIDIA

4.3 out of 5

8 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top SwiftStack [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SwiftStack [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, and Dell ObjectScale. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SwiftStack surpasses its competitors by offering seamless scalability, robust multi-cloud data management, and integrated storage solutions, ensuring superior performance and flexibility for enterprise workloads.

NVIDIA Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with NVIDIA, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Red Hat Ceph Storage

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Ceph Storage

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Ceph Storage is used in private cloud deployments with OpenStack and Kubernetes. It supports block, object, and file storage, appealing for cloud environments. While users value its scalability and reliability, challenges include performance issues needing fast hardware. Users also seek improvements in compatibility, user interface, and resource consumption.

Pricing

The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical.

There is no cost for software.

View comparison

Pricing

The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical.

There is no cost for software.

MinIO

4.0 out of 5

MinIO

4.0 out of 5

MinIO, open-source and cloud-native, excels in data storage, document management, and machine learning. Users appreciate its S3 compatibility, ease of use, and high scalability. Though issues exist with large datasets and documentation, MinIO remains versatile for legal teams, developers, and data scientists with support for hybrid environments and integration capabilities.

Pricing

This is an open-source solution but I am using the licensed version.

This solution is open source so it is free.

View comparison

Pricing

This is an open-source solution but I am using the licensed version.

This solution is open source so it is free.

Dell ObjectScale

4.1 out of 5

Dell ObjectScale

4.1 out of 5

SwiftStack [EOL] attracts those seeking cost-effective solutions with easy deployment and support. In comparison, Dell ObjectScale appeals to organizations needing advanced features and seamless integration with Dell technologies, despite higher costs, ensuring long-term value for functionality-focused enterprises.

Pricing

SwiftStack [EOL] offers a moderate setup cost suitable for mid-sized deployments, while Dell ObjectScale provides a more scalable option with potentially higher initial costs but increased enterprise-level capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)

4.4 out of 5

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)

4.4 out of 5

Organizations use Nutanix Unified Storage to enhance database performance, consolidate file repositories, and provide secure storage. It offers hybrid cloud connectivity, virtual machine deployment, ransomware protection, and centralized management. It also improves file sharing, supports enterprise applications, and facilitates backups, with scalability, high availability, and integration with AWS and Azure. Improvement is needed in setup, analytics, and customer service.

Pricing

The price of the license is expensive when comparing it to traditional storage.

I find Nutanix Files Storage competitively priced, even its feature set. Its price is seven out of ten.

View comparison

Pricing

The price of the license is expensive when comparing it to traditional storage.

I find Nutanix Files Storage competitively priced, even its feature set. Its price is seven out of ten.

Scality RING

4.1 out of 5

Scality RING

4.1 out of 5

Scality RING is used for backups and storage, handling data via S3 APIs and offering multi-site management. Users praise its performance, scalability, unified tiered infrastructure, and life cycle management, while requesting improved S3 compliance, automation, and user interfaces. Durability and scalability support seamless capacity growth for reliable data preservation.

Pricing

The cost of Scality RING8 could be less expensive. It is difficult for smaller businesses to afford it.

The initial cost (CAPEX) to set up the infrastructure is expensive due to the specific hardware required.

View comparison

Pricing

The cost of Scality RING8 could be less expensive. It is difficult for smaller businesses to afford it.

The initial cost (CAPEX) to set up the infrastructure is expensive due to the specific hardware required.

Cloudian HyperStore

4.1 out of 5

Cloudian HyperStore

4.1 out of 5

Cloudian HyperStore is primarily used for backup storage and archiving, handling unstructured data like backups and media assets. It offers scalability, data sovereignty, and S3 compatibility, supporting compliance needs. Users value its RESTful API, WORM security, versioning, and erasure coding. Desired enhancements include better integration with HyperFile, improved automation, and enhanced documentation.

Pricing

Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte.

The solution is cheap.

View comparison

Pricing

Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte.

The solution is cheap.

DataCore Swarm

5.0 out of 5

DataCore Swarm

5.0 out of 5

DataCore Swarm is used for customer archiving, immediate payments, and on-premise object storage. Its S3 protocol compatibility allows data immutability and governance. Users appreciate flexibility, scalability, and ease of upgrades. Challenges include pricing flexibility, complex architecture, and maintenance. Plans for a container-based architecture aim to enhance usability and address concerns.

Pricing

You pay for what you use. For example, if you use one terabyte, you just pay for that one terabyte. But the pricing could always be better

The first installation brick is expensive but the upgrades are extremely simple and granular by adding disks or nodes.

View comparison

Pricing

You pay for what you use. For example, if you use one terabyte, you just pay for that one terabyte. But the pricing could always be better

The first installation brick is expensive but the upgrades are extremely simple and granular by adding disks or nodes.

Related categories

File and Object Storage

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

All-Flash Storage