SwiftStack [EOL] offers robust cloud integration, rapid deployment, and hardware-agnostic capabilities, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing scalable and flexible storage solutions. It supports a variety of storage needs from object storage to enterprise-grade backup systems.
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ceph Storage | 4.1 | 14.5% | 82% | 27 interviewsAdd to research |
| MinIO | 4.0 | 15.2% | 100% | 24 interviewsAdd to research |
SwiftStack offers flexible pricing models based on capacity and usage, catering to different enterprise needs. Users report competitive pricing for large-scale deployments, with cost efficiency improving as data volumes grow. They also appreciate the transparent pricing structure. However, some note that additional features and support can increase costs. SwiftStack provides a cost-effective solution for scalable data management.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
SwiftStack [EOL] is recognized for its seamless cloud integration and platform independence, enabling rapid deployment and superior scalability. Its metadata search, proxyFS, and 1space feature enhance versatility and backup efficiency. SwiftStack Controller provides an enhanced management experience with easy system upgrades and performance monitoring. While the management UI and ProxyFS maturity have room for improvement, users seek more organized interfaces and better REST API support. Enhancements in erasure coding configurations and data archiving, along with improved client library integrations, are highlighted needs. The demand for NFS integration improvements and options for data movement between storage policies is noted.
What are the key features of SwiftStack?SwiftStack [EOL] is implemented in industries as a backup platform for Commvault and Veeam, cloud storage similar to Amazon S3 or Azure Blob. It's essential for SaaS platforms, data sharing in research, preproduction object storage, data center operations, and archival management for OpenStack Swift servers in educational and research institutions.
Pac-12 Networks, Georgia Institute of Technology, Budd Van Lines
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| System administrator at a library with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | No summary available |
| Group Leader Online Data Services at Surfsara | 4.5 | SwiftStack effectively fills our academic data-sharing needs, offering versatile, stable, low-latency storage with minimal manpower. We highly recommend it for its performance and excellent support, despite the steep cost and a wish for more Erasure coding options. |
| Engineering Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I chose SwiftStack for its significant cost savings and flexibility, enabling Amazon-like object storage on-premise. The SwiftStack Controller is a key feature, and it offers great stability and scalability. I recommend it, though file access and distributed erasure coding need improvement. |
| Scientific Information Officer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | SwiftStack serves as our flexible, hardware-agnostic backup storage, offering excellent stability, scalability, and significant cost savings. Although the UI needs organization, its hybrid cloud features and great support make it a valuable solution, improving data distribution. |
| Head of Cloud Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | SwiftStack provides phenomenal scalability and resilience for my SaaS platform, cutting storage costs by half and improving our SLA. Setup was straightforward, and support is good. I'd like better client integrations and support for them. I rate it 8/10. |
| Chief Technology Officer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | We successfully launched a new cloud storage product, generating revenue thanks to the solution's good scalability, performance, and excellent support. However, I found proxyFS maturity and large-scale code upgrades need improvement. |
| Enterprise Architect at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | SwiftStack significantly reduced our data storage costs and management, eliminating physical tapes. I value its hardware flexibility, easy scalability, and exceptional support. I only wish for more automated, non-proprietary archiving features to enhance this powerful solution. |
| Software Engineer 3, Cloud Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I find this solution great for management control and easy deployment, significantly reducing man-hours with simple setup. I experienced no issues and am satisfied with support, though the management UI could be improved. |
![SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/rCrJ5QMmvucDdhnMyyNUFbAd.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Red Hat Ceph Storage vs SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/9pv58sxiauagk0b37vs2fjbq5dbq.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![MinIO vs SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/3mb0zilt43f2utmoekywxssalxfb.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Dell ObjectScale vs SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/nb70b5ansummme9cc5q5ymwyalbv.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/haosg86qw426gprr0w60eovzmyaw.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Scality RING vs SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/9nk6efn4r5e6qu354sgh3hfrpgv5.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Cloudian HyperStore vs SwiftStack [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/kJoaC4bed1Z7Fb4NstmguvF5.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}