Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo

Top 10 Tintri VMstore T7000 Alternatives

Vendor: Tintri
4.7 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Tintri VMstore T7000 Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tintri VMstore T7000 based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerStore, Pure Storage FlashBlade, and NetApp AFF. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Tintri VMstore T7000 surpasses its competitors by delivering unmatched performance with intelligent VMs, data deduplication, advanced analytics, and streamlined management, making it an ideal choice for efficient, scalable virtual environments.

Tintri Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Tintri, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Dell PowerStore
4.4 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Dell PowerStore
4.4 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 offers management simplicity and data analytics, appealing for ease of use and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Dell PowerStore draws buyers with its scalability and extensive integration capabilities, providing strong value through its comprehensive feature set and long-term investment returns.
Download Dell PowerStore vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 setup cost is significantly lower, whereas Dell PowerStore requires a higher initial investment. Tintri VMstore T7000 offers lower setup complexity compared to the more involved setup process of Dell PowerStore.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 setup cost is significantly lower, whereas Dell PowerStore requires a higher initial investment. Tintri VMstore T7000 offers lower setup complexity compared to the more involved setup process of Dell PowerStore.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade
4.4 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 offers strong VM-level analytics and automation, enhancing management efficiency. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high performance, scalability, and robust native data protection. Tech buyers might choose Tintri for cost-effectiveness or Pure Storage FlashBlade for advanced features and superior scalability.
Download Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 has higher setup costs, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more affordable initial setup. Tintri prioritizes advanced features, but Pure Storage balances cost-efficiency and performance.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 has higher setup costs, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers a more affordable initial setup. Tintri prioritizes advanced features, but Pure Storage balances cost-efficiency and performance.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
NetApp AFF
4.5 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
NetApp AFF
4.5 out of 5
NetApp AFF provides robust support and good pricing, while Tintri VMstore T7000 excels in features despite a higher price. In comparison, Tintri VMstore T7000 is favored for its automation and performance analytics, whereas NetApp AFF is appreciated for its advanced data protection and efficient storage management.
Download NetApp AFF vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
NetApp AFF has a high initial setup cost, while Tintri VMstore T7000 is more affordable upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
NetApp AFF has a high initial setup cost, while Tintri VMstore T7000 is more affordable upfront.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray
4.5 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 attracts buyers with AI-driven automation and VM-level granularity, while Pure Storage FlashArray impresses with robust data reduction and high-speed performance. In comparison, Tintri's straightforward deployment contrasts with Pure’s superior support services. Tintri's cost-effectiveness opposes Pure's justification through advanced features.
Download Pure Storage FlashArray vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 users report lower setup costs, while Pure Storage FlashArray is noted for higher initial expenses. Setup cost differences play a significant role in the decision-making process between these two storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 users report lower setup costs, while Pure Storage FlashArray is noted for higher initial expenses. Setup cost differences play a significant role in the decision-making process between these two storage solutions.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
IBM FlashSystem
4.1 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
IBM FlashSystem
4.1 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 excels in ease of management and integration. In comparison, IBM FlashSystem is noted for high performance and scalability. Tintri offers automation and detailed analytics, while IBM provides deduplication and encryption. Tintri is cost-effective for medium-sized deployments, whereas IBM is ideal for large enterprises seeking long-term investment returns.
Download IBM FlashSystem vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 often incurs higher setup costs, while IBM FlashSystem is noted for more budget-friendly initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 often incurs higher setup costs, while IBM FlashSystem is noted for more budget-friendly initial expenses.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Dell PowerMax
4.4 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Dell PowerMax
4.4 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 excels in VM-specific metrics and resource management with hybrid flash. In comparison, Dell PowerMax enhances performance and storage with NVMe-based backend and robust deduplication. Tintri is noted for effortless deployment, while PowerMax suits larger organizations needing enterprise features.
Download Dell PowerMax vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 setup costs are reported as minimal and straightforward, while Dell PowerMax involves a higher initial expenditure with complex implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 setup costs are reported as minimal and straightforward, while Dell PowerMax involves a higher initial expenditure with complex implementation.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
4.3 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
4.3 out of 5
HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers robust performance and virtualized storage management suitable for large-scale needs. In comparison, Tintri VMstore T7000 excels in ease of management and VM-level automation. HPE 3PAR StoreServ requires expertise for deployment, whereas Tintri VMstore T7000 provides fast, straightforward setup at a competitive price.
Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
HPE 3PAR StoreServ has a higher setup cost compared to Tintri VMstore T7000, which is known for its affordability and ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE 3PAR StoreServ has a higher setup cost compared to Tintri VMstore T7000, which is known for its affordability and ease of deployment.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
HPE Nimble Storage
4.5 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
HPE Nimble Storage
4.5 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 provides flexible pricing, minimal administrative overhead, and ease of use. In comparison, HPE Nimble Storage excels in all-flash performance, advanced data reduction, and reliability. Tintri could improve scalability, while HPE Nimble needs better reporting features. Tintri's competitive pricing contrasts with HPE Nimble's efficiency-driven ROI.
Download HPE Nimble Storage vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 has a higher setup cost compared to HPE Nimble Storage, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 has a higher setup cost compared to HPE Nimble Storage, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Zadara
4.3 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Zadara
4.3 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 offers simplified management and strong performance, suitable for businesses needing real-time analytics and automated data placement. In comparison, Zadara excels with flexible, scalable architecture and multi-cloud capabilities, fitting enterprises with diverse workloads seeking long-term feature flexibility and scalability.
Download Tintri VMstore T7000 vs. Zadara Report
Tintri VMstore T7000 features a lower setup cost, while Zadara incurs higher initial expenses. Tintri VMstore T7000 is cost-effective for deployment, in contrast to Zadara's pricier setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Tintri VMstore T7000 features a lower setup cost, while Zadara incurs higher initial expenses. Tintri VMstore T7000 is cost-effective for deployment, in contrast to Zadara's pricier setup requirements.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Dell XtremIO
3.8 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Dell XtremIO
3.8 out of 5
Dell XtremIO delivers high performance and scalability; however, users suggest improvements in deduplication and integration. In comparison, Tintri VMstore T7000 excels with simplicity, VM-level analytics, and automation. Dell XtremIO has straightforward deployment but may need support, while Tintri's deployment generally requires less support.
Download Dell XtremIO vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
Dell XtremIO setup costs are often seen as higher due to its advanced features, while Tintri VMstore T7000 offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Dell XtremIO provides robust scalability, contrasting with Tintri VMstore T7000’s ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell XtremIO setup costs are often seen as higher due to its advanced features, while Tintri VMstore T7000 offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Dell XtremIO provides robust scalability, contrasting with Tintri VMstore T7000’s ease of deployment.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
DDN IntelliFlash
3.8 out of 5
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
DDN IntelliFlash
3.8 out of 5
DDN IntelliFlash offers hybrid storage options and high-performance flash arrays that appeal to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Tintri VMstore T7000 stands out with its VM-aware capabilities and automation features, providing advanced VM management tools for those prioritizing performance and streamlined management.
Download DDN IntelliFlash vs. Tintri VMstore T7000 Report
DDN IntelliFlash has lower setup costs, while Tintri VMstore T7000 offers more advanced setup features. Tintri VMstore T7000 focuses on ease of installation and efficiency, contrasting with lower initial expenses of DDN IntelliFlash.
View comparison
Pricing
DDN IntelliFlash has lower setup costs, while Tintri VMstore T7000 offers more advanced setup features. Tintri VMstore T7000 focuses on ease of installation and efficiency, contrasting with lower initial expenses of DDN IntelliFlash.
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Tintri VMstore T7000 Logo
Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System
4.0 out of 5

The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, Oracle’s premier preferred SAN storage solution, delivers enterprise-grade storage capabilities that are optimized for flash media and coengineered with Oracle software. Using the Quality of Service Plus (QoS Plus) feature, the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system places data across flash and disk storage to maximize performance, efficiency, and cost based on usage profiles and business priorities. The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system takes application-engineered storage to a new level by providing out-of-the-box tuned storage provisioning profiles for Oracle Database and key applications, including Microsoft SharePoint and Exchange, and VMware support including VAAI. With the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, you can consolidate storage while achieving predictable performance for multiple diverse workloads in enterprise computing or multitenant environments.

View comparison

Related categories

All-Flash Storage
Data Warehouse
NAS