Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo

Top 10 Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Alternatives

Vendor: Trend Micro
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security surpasses its competitors by providing advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and AI-driven analysis, ensuring superior protection and streamlined management for enterprises dedicated to safeguarding their digital assets effectively.

Trend Micro Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trend Micro, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers ease of installation and strong security integration, ideal for companies seeking comprehensive protection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR capabilities, appealing to environments needing minimal system impact and robust remote management.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a one-time setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon opts for a subscription-based setup model. The key difference lies in their pricing structures, with each catering to distinct budgeting preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a one-time setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon opts for a subscription-based setup model. The key difference lies in their pricing structures, with each catering to distinct budgeting preferences.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers competitive pricing, notable customer support, intuitive threat detection, effective malware blocking, and robust incident response tools. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has extensive integrations, advanced threat analytics, automated investigation, and remediation features that justify its higher price.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more extensive initial setup package.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more extensive initial setup package.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is appreciated for comprehensive integration and automated responses. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced threat detection and real-time remediation. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in customer service, while Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with superior features that justify its higher price.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR is more affordable initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR is more affordable initially.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in ease of use and comprehensive protection. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers robust threat detection and response capabilities. The former needs better tool integration and updates, while the latter could simplify configurations. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is competitively priced; SentinelOne Singularity Complete justifies its higher cost with superior features.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its manageable setup costs, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher initial setup expenses reflecting its extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its manageable setup costs, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher initial setup expenses reflecting its extensive features.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive protection features. In comparison, HP Wolf Security has strong isolation capabilities and high effectiveness against various attacks. Trend Vision One offers versatile functionalities, while HP Wolf’s targeted feature set frequently provides superior security outcomes.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more affordable initial setup.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers a more intuitive experience, while Cortex XDR excels in advanced threat detection and response. In comparison, Trend Vision One excels in comprehensive endpoint protection and easy integration. Cortex XDR stands out with robust analytics and machine learning. Cortex XDR is costlier but provides stronger ROI.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial expense. Cortex XDR may have a longer setup process compared to Trend Vision One.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial expense. Cortex XDR may have a longer setup process compared to Trend Vision One.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and automated response capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR provides deep integration within the Microsoft ecosystem and advanced AI-driven threat analytics. Tech buyers may choose Trend Vision One for cost-effectiveness, while Microsoft Defender XDR is favored for comprehensive features.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR has a higher initial investment for its configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR has a higher initial investment for its configuration.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in usability and customer support. In comparison, Elastic Security's advanced features justify the additional cost. Trend Vision One offers easy deployment and commendable customer service, while Elastic Security focuses on powerful analytics and flexible integration capabilities for superior protection.
Download Elastic Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security. Elastic Security offers more affordable initial costs, making it the more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security. Elastic Security offers more affordable initial costs, making it the more budget-friendly option.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers ease of deployment with real-time updates, suitable for diverse IT infrastructures. In comparison, Tanium excels in instant discovery and advanced threat management, appealing to those managing complex security operations seeking detailed data insights despite potentially higher costs.
Download Tanium vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a lower initial setup cost, whereas Tanium presents a higher upfront expense. Differences in setup costs reflect the varied approaches of each solution in addressing user security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a lower initial setup cost, whereas Tanium presents a higher upfront expense. Differences in setup costs reflect the varied approaches of each solution in addressing user security needs.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers affordability and robust threat detection with straightforward management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient, with its higher cost, provides extensive security features, including VPN and advanced malware protection. Trend Vision One is cost-effective, while Fortinet FortiClient offers significant value through its features.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup process compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which users find more complex and time-consuming. Fortinet FortiClient requires significant initial configuration, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is largely hassle-free.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup process compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which users find more complex and time-consuming. Fortinet FortiClient requires significant initial configuration, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is largely hassle-free.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is notable for robust DLP and encryption with efficient central management via ePolicy Orchestrator. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers strong threat prevention and behavior monitoring with advanced machine learning for adaptable protection, appealing for its integration capabilities.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a moderate setup cost, offering cost-effective protection, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher setup cost, providing extensive features. The primary difference lies in the balance between price and offered functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a moderate setup cost, offering cost-effective protection, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher setup cost, providing extensive features. The primary difference lies in the balance between price and offered functionalities.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security provides comprehensive threat detection and strong system integration. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced analytics and cloud-based threat intelligence. Symantec offers competitive pricing, while Trend Vision One's advanced features provide substantial value for a higher cost. Symantec excels in ease of deployment and customer service, whereas Trend Vision One requires better documentation and support.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's more affordable setup fee. Significant differences in pricing are evident.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's more affordable setup fee. Significant differences in pricing are evident.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels with seamless firewall integration and anti-ransomware features. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers virtual patching and cost-effectiveness. Check Point is suitable for comprehensive management, while Trend Vision One appeals with ease of use and adaptability to evolving threats.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup cost is low, making it budget-friendly, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup cost is low, making it budget-friendly, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers robust malware protection and easy deployment with good customer support. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's advanced threat intelligence and superior customer service can justify its higher price for organizations with complex security needs.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business involves a moderate setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a lower initial investment. Trend Vision One's setup cost is notably more budget-friendly compared to Kaspersky's pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business involves a moderate setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a lower initial investment. Trend Vision One's setup cost is notably more budget-friendly compared to Kaspersky's pricing.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix is favored for its cost-effectiveness, support quality, and robust patch management. In comparison, Trend Vision One excels in advanced threat detection and automated incident response. Trend Vision One appeals to security-focused organizations, while tech buyers appreciate BigFix for its lower setup costs and efficient resource management.
Download BigFix vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
BigFix has a high setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more economical initial deployment. BigFix might require a larger budget upfront compared to the more affordable Trend Vision One Endpoint Security.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a high setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more economical initial deployment. BigFix might require a larger budget upfront compared to the more affordable Trend Vision One Endpoint Security.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in antivirus capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses with advanced threat intelligence and integration. ESET has easier deployment, while Trend Vision One requires a larger initial investment but offers long-term benefits through extensive features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform excels in network visibility and access control, appealing to those needing detailed endpoint oversight. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust endpoint protection, making it ideal for hybrid cloud environments, emphasizing advanced threat detection and cloud support.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Forescout Platform's setup cost is low, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's higher setup fee may be suited for organizations prioritizing advanced security features over initial investment savings.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform's setup cost is low, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's higher setup fee may be suited for organizations prioritizing advanced security features over initial investment savings.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides advanced threat detection and customizable controls. In comparison, Cynet offers extensive automated remediation tools and a comprehensive security approach. Trend Vision One is cost-effective, while Cynet's higher cost is seen as justified due to its extensive capabilities and long-term ROI.
Download Cynet vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Cynet, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Cynet, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One attracts tech buyers with its strong pricing and support. In comparison, Intercept X features deep learning technology and advanced malware protection, justifying its higher price. Trend Vision One excels in threat detection, while Intercept X offers superior malware protection.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, highlighting a significant difference in onboarding expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, highlighting a significant difference in onboarding expenses between the two solutions.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses tech buyers with its advanced threat detection, automated responses, and competitive pricing. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in superior threat hunting, seamless integration, and efficient customer service, making it worth the higher cost for enhanced capabilities.
Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost reviewed as affordable and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a higher setup cost and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost reviewed as affordable and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a higher setup cost and complexity.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers broad platform support, advanced threat detection, and seamless integration with other Trend Micro solutions. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business excels in deep integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing sophisticated security features particularly beneficial for Microsoft 365 users.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers more cost-effective initial pricing. The substantial difference in costs is a critical factor for businesses when deciding between these endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers more cost-effective initial pricing. The substantial difference in costs is a critical factor for businesses when deciding between these endpoint security solutions.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and easy integration, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels with real-time threat intelligence and scalability. In comparison, Trend Vision One is cost-effective with straightforward deployment, whereas VMware Carbon Black provides detailed forensics and high perceived value despite higher costs.
Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, making it a more economical choice in terms of initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, making it a more economical choice in terms of initial expenses.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses with extensive threat detection and integration flexibility. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels with advanced machine learning and comprehensive reporting. Trend Vision One offers easier deployment; Bitdefender shines in customer service and offers a robust feature set for long-term ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, making it a more expensive initial investment. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers a lower setup cost, providing a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, making it a more expensive initial investment. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers a lower setup cost, providing a more budget-friendly option.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in advanced malware protection and seamless integration with other Cisco products. Trend Vision, with its competitive pricing, contrasts Cisco Secure Endpoint's higher cost justified by its robust features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, making it more affordable upfront, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, making it more affordable upfront, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Norton Small Business excels in frequent updates and comprehensive malware protection. Trend Vision One needs better reporting, while Norton Small Business could improve real-time threat response. Trend Vision One has more praised customer service.
Download Norton Small Business vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a significant setup cost, while Norton Small Business offers a more affordable setup fee. Trend Vision One focuses on extensive security features, whereas Norton is ideal for budget-conscious small businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a significant setup cost, while Norton Small Business offers a more affordable setup fee. Trend Vision One focuses on extensive security features, whereas Norton is ideal for budget-conscious small businesses.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels with extensive endpoint protection and integrated machine learning. In comparison, Malwarebytes Teams prioritizes efficient malware detection and remediation. Tech buyers might prefer Trend Vision One for advanced security or Malwarebytes Teams for cost-effective, straightforward malware protection.
Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher setup cost, while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Users may look for more comprehensive features in Trend Vision One compared to the basic protection from Malwarebytes Teams.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher setup cost, while Malwarebytes Teams offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Users may look for more comprehensive features in Trend Vision One compared to the basic protection from Malwarebytes Teams.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security focuses on antivirus capabilities and seamless integration, appealing to those prioritizing threat protection and deployment ease. In comparison, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager targets application control, appealing to enterprises needing enhanced control and privilege management despite its complex architecture.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a competitive setup cost compared to CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, which may present higher initial expenses. These differences in pricing structures highlight varying market approaches for endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a competitive setup cost compared to CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, which may present higher initial expenses. These differences in pricing structures highlight varying market approaches for endpoint security solutions.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security scores well in pricing and support, with robust threat detection and seamless security tool integration. In comparison, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response excels in advanced threat detection, managing sophisticated attacks and offering an intuitive management system, making it worth the higher price for many.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, offering affordability for smaller budgets, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for its more comprehensive setup, which may justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, offering affordability for smaller budgets, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for its more comprehensive setup, which may justify its higher initial investment.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in threat detection and automatic remediation. In comparison, Datto EDR is valued for its advanced threat intelligence and incident response. Trend Vision One offers competitive pricing, whereas Datto EDR delivers a higher ROI due to its comprehensive security features.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), making the latter a more cost-effective option for initial setup expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), making the latter a more cost-effective option for initial setup expenditures.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Digital Guardian offers straightforward pricing and responsive support but lacks integration with other tools. In comparison, Trend Vision One's advanced analytics and integration justify its higher cost. Digital Guardian simplifies deployment, whereas Trend Vision One provides flexible options and comprehensive security features, making it a worthy investment.
Download Digital Guardian vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Digital Guardian has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Trend Vision One offers a more comprehensive feature set justifying its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation. Trend Vision One offers a more comprehensive feature set justifying its higher setup cost.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is favored for its ease of use and strong customer support, while NetWitness NDR excels in threat detection. In comparison, NetWitness NDR's integration limitations are noted, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more straightforward deployment process and cost-effectiveness.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more affordable setup cost, while NetWitness NDR has a higher initial investment. NetWitness NDR's setup is more comprehensive, but Trend Vision One is budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more affordable setup cost, while NetWitness NDR has a higher initial investment. NetWitness NDR's setup is more comprehensive, but Trend Vision One is budget-friendly.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat protection with seamless integration. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance focuses on AI-driven solutions for zero-day threats. Trend Vision One appeals to those seeking centralized management, while Cylance suits organizations prioritizing AI performance over multi-layer features.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security may have a lower initial setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity. However, BlackBerry Cylance offers advanced features that could justify a higher expense for comprehensive cybersecurity needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security may have a lower initial setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity. However, BlackBerry Cylance offers advanced features that could justify a higher expense for comprehensive cybersecurity needs.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Trend Vision One excels in threat detection and response capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive endpoint protection. In comparison, Seqrite offers user-friendly management and robust device control features. Trend Vision One has better customer support, while Seqrite appeals more to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Seqrite Endpoint Security provides a more budget-friendly option. The cost difference between the two is significant, impacting overall budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Seqrite Endpoint Security provides a more budget-friendly option. The cost difference between the two is significant, impacting overall budget considerations.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers user-friendly policy management and effective threat detection. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert provides advanced threat hunting and automated response mechanisms. Trend Vision One emphasizes usability, while Kaspersky excels in integration and setup features. Pricing favors Trend Vision One, Kaspersky compensates with strong security functionalities.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers an affordable setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is relatively higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers an affordable setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is relatively higher.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive protection and centralized management. In comparison, Morphisec's lightweight agent and advanced attack prevention technology provide simplicity and effectiveness. Trend Vision is favored for extensive features, while Morphisec is appreciated for its proactive attack prevention and lower resource impact.
Download Morphisec vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is easier to set up, while Morphisec incurs lower initial costs. Trend Vision One offers complex deployment options, contrasting with Morphisec's straightforward installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is easier to set up, while Morphisec incurs lower initial costs. Trend Vision One offers complex deployment options, contrasting with Morphisec's straightforward installation process.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate excels in detection accuracy and threat intelligence, making it valuable for users seeking detailed reporting and intuitive management. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in threat detection, response automation, and seamless integration, appealing to those prioritizing advanced features and comprehensive protection.
Download Fidelis Elevate vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Fidelis Elevate offers lower setup costs compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, highlighting a significant cost advantage. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, however, provides more extensive features despite its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate offers lower setup costs compared to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, highlighting a significant cost advantage. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, however, provides more extensive features despite its higher initial investment.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for affordability and ease of deployment with real-time scanning. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, though pricier, offers advanced threat intelligence and automated responses. Trend Vision One prioritizes simplicity, while Kaspersky focuses on comprehensive, customizable security.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has a lower initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has a lower initial expense.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in threat detection and automated response, while Logpoint impresses with log management and SIEM functionalities. In comparison, Trend Vision One provides easier deployment and customer service. However, Logpoint offers extensive features and customization, which may justify its higher setup costs.
Download Logpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Logpoint. Logpoint's setup cost is higher but it includes extensive support options.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Logpoint. Logpoint's setup cost is higher but it includes extensive support options.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5

ESET PROTECT Elite is an all-in-one prevention, detection & response combining enterprise-grade XDR with complete multilayered protection.

Download ESET EDR/XDR vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
View comparison
Pricing
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers extensive protection features, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform focuses on innovative deep learning-based prevention. In comparison, Deep Instinct requires complex initial setup, but excels in customer service. Trend Vision One is cost-effective, whereas Deep Instinct justifies its higher price with exceptional ROI.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers a more affordable initial cost, showcasing a difference in pricing suitable for various budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers a more affordable initial cost, showcasing a difference in pricing suitable for various budget considerations.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers advanced threat protection and integration with Trend Micro products, ideal for those seeking comprehensive security. In comparison, OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is lightweight and cost-effective, suited for organizations needing basic protection without extensive features.
Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security entails a higher setup cost, contrasting with the more budget-friendly setup of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection. This cost difference highlights contrasting target markets and priorities between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security entails a higher setup cost, contrasting with the more budget-friendly setup of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection. This cost difference highlights contrasting target markets and priorities between the solutions.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Total Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is known for advanced threat detection and real-time analytics. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security offers robust antivirus protection and a secure VPN. Tech buyers might choose Trend Vision One for better deployment and customer service or Kaspersky for comprehensive features and value.
Download Kaspersky Total Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Total Security. Kaspersky Total Security offers a more affordable setup, providing a cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Total Security. Kaspersky Total Security offers a more affordable setup, providing a cost-effective solution.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Sophos offers synchronized security and advanced threat detection, ideal for businesses prioritizing seamless protection. In comparison, Trend Vision One provides comprehensive features like EDR and DLP, suited for those needing extensive security measures. Sophos is cost-effective, while Trend Vision One caters to advanced needs.
Download Sophos Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Sophos Endpoint has a lower setup cost, offering budget-friendly deployment options, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Endpoint has a lower setup cost, offering budget-friendly deployment options, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Open EDR provides robust threat detection and response capabilities, offering valuable features for data security, including real-time analysis and customizable alerts. Users appreciate its extensive integration options. However, improvements in documentation and better customer support would enhance its user experience.
View comparison
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in support and intuitive features. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers advanced functionalities and real-time threat intelligence. Trend Vision One has competitive setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client justifies its higher price with comprehensive features and satisfactory ROI. Trend Vision One is user-friendly.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable setup option. Trend Vision One is suited for larger budgets, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is ideal for cost-conscious customers.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more affordable setup option. Trend Vision One is suited for larger budgets, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is ideal for cost-conscious customers.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.7 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and automated response capabilities with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, suitable for easier integration. In comparison, Trellix EDR is valued for comprehensive analytics, advanced threat intelligence, and deep threat analysis, justifying its higher price despite requiring more initial configuration.
Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost noted for its ease, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a more intricate and potentially higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost noted for its ease, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a more intricate and potentially higher setup cost.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Compliance
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)