Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo

Top 10 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Alternatives

Vendor: WithSecure
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, real-time detection capabilities, and automated threat response, providing superior protection and streamlined security operations for businesses of all sizes.

WithSecure Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WithSecure, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers superior EDR capabilities with AI and ML integration. In comparison, WithSecure Elements provides reliable threat analysis and forensics. For tech buyers, CrowdStrike excels in real-time prevention; WithSecure appeals with cost-effective solutions and robust deployment options.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while WithSecure Elements incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting significant variability in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while WithSecure Elements incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting significant variability in their pricing structures.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers excellent integration with Microsoft products and advanced threat protection, suiting users needing straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, WithSecure Elements provides superior detection capabilities and customization options, appealing to those valuing advanced features despite a higher price.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in pricing and support, offering comprehensive threat detection and automated response. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, appreciated for advanced features like superior threat intelligence and machine learning, justifies its higher cost for users seeking robust and effective security solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes premium security, whereas WithSecure focuses on affordability without compromising efficacy.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes premium security, whereas WithSecure focuses on affordability without compromising efficacy.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete impresses with automated response capabilities and AI-driven threat detection. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers flexibility with its modular design and cost-effectiveness. SentinelOne focuses on advanced features while WithSecure emphasizes customization and value for budget-conscious buyers.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher initial setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, which offers a more economical setup fee for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher initial setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, which offers a more economical setup fee for budget-conscious users.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar is ideal for large enterprises needing robust log management, scalability, and real-time threat detection. In comparison, WithSecure Elements offers economical endpoint protection and a user-friendly dashboard, appealing to businesses seeking accessible, efficient EDR solutions.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
IBM Security QRadar typically involves higher setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive features, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more economical initial investment, appealing to those prioritizing cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar typically involves higher setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive features, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more economical initial investment, appealing to those prioritizing cost efficiency.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat isolation and malware protection, making it ideal for seamless system integration. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is preferred for detailed forensic data and threat analytics. HP Wolf Security is cost-effective; WithSecure Elements offers deep analytical capabilities and high-value ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost than WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, making it more affordable for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost than WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, making it more affordable for initial deployment.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides endpoint protection by detecting and blocking malware. It integrates with firewalls, enhances security with AI-driven threat detection, and offers behavior-based analysis. Praised for its user-friendly interface, it ensures endpoint safety but faces challenges like integration issues, high memory usage, and compatibility differences.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
View comparison
Pricing
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is appreciated for its precise threat analytics. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR integrates broader capabilities for enterprise environments. WithSecure Elements is noted for easy deployment in smaller settings, while Microsoft Defender XDR benefits from a global support infrastructure.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
The setup cost for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is lower than Microsoft Defender XDR.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is lower than Microsoft Defender XDR.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security excels in real-time threat detection and seamless integration, offering strong customer support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, WithSecure Elements EDR provides advanced threat hunting and incident response, focusing on scalable features and customization, valued for its robust capabilities despite higher costs.
Download Elastic Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Elastic Security's setup cost is low, making it budget-friendly, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost that could be a consideration for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security's setup cost is low, making it budget-friendly, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost that could be a consideration for smaller businesses.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
TrendAI Vision One offers expansive functionalities including strong network detection, behavior analytics, and third-party integrations. In comparison, WithSecure Elements excels with its user-friendly dashboard and cost-effective approach, making it suitable for tight budgets despite having fewer advanced features than TrendAI Vision One.
Download TrendAI Vision One vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
TrendAI Vision One features a higher setup cost compared to the lower initial expense of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, highlighting a significant difference in preliminary investment requirements for implementing these solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
TrendAI Vision One features a higher setup cost compared to the lower initial expense of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, highlighting a significant difference in preliminary investment requirements for implementing these solutions.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive protection with features like Anti-Ransomware and Threat Emulation, ideal for users needing advanced threat detection and detailed logs. In comparison, WithSecure Elements stands out with automated flaw detection and economical pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response presents a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response presents a more complex pricing structure.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business provides robust protection with advanced threat detection and system management. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers superior threat hunting, AI-powered anomaly detection, and comprehensive incident response. Kaspersky’s pricing and support appeal, whereas WithSecure’s advanced capabilities justify higher costs.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a moderate setup cost, whereas WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a more affordable setup cost. Kaspersky offers higher initial setup fees, highlighting a significant difference in cost between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a moderate setup cost, whereas WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a more affordable setup cost. Kaspersky offers higher initial setup fees, highlighting a significant difference in cost between the two solutions.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet offers cost-effective threat detection with straightforward deployment, while WithSecure Elements EDR provides advanced forensic tools at a higher price. In comparison, Cynet excels in automation and ease of deployment. WithSecure Elements EDR’s robust integration features make it appealing for long-term value.
Download Cynet vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Cynet offers straightforward setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response features more customizable pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet offers straightforward setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response features more customizable pricing options.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response features robust threat detection and automated response. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced malware detection and integrated endpoint and network security. WithSecure may need better reporting, while WatchGuard could improve configuration. Both excel in deployment; WithSecure is praised for support.
Download WatchGuard EPDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response features a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR stands out with a budget-friendly setup cost that appeals to cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response features a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR stands out with a budget-friendly setup cost that appeals to cost-conscious businesses.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in customer support and pricing flexibility. In comparison, WithSecure Elements EDR is noted for its extensive feature set. WithSecure Elements EDR's advanced threat analytics attract tech buyers, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's cost-effectiveness appeals to smaller organizations.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR features a low setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher initial investment. The difference highlights Bitdefender's affordability compared to WithSecure's advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR features a low setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher initial investment. The difference highlights Bitdefender's affordability compared to WithSecure's advanced capabilities.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black offers efficient support and pricing structure, with users appreciating its comprehensive reporting and real-time threat detection. In comparison, WithSecure Elements excels with automated response capabilities and advanced security features, valued for its robust threat prevention. Some may find VMware Carbon Black easier to deploy and more cost-effective.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a lower initial setup expense, making it a more budget-friendly choice.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a lower initial setup expense, making it a more budget-friendly choice.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint appeals to budget-conscious users with robust support and competitive pricing. In comparison, WithSecure Elements, with its advanced feature set, offers extensive threat detection and integration capabilities. Logpoint streamlines deployment and alert management, while WithSecure Elements enhances threat response and supports comprehensive integration.
Download Logpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Logpoint has a higher setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint has a higher setup cost compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers impressive pricing and responsive support. In comparison, ConnectWise SIEM provides comprehensive reporting and customization. ConnectWise SIEM requires better documentation, whereas WithSecure should enhance automation. For cost-effective solutions, WithSecure is ideal, while ConnectWise SIEM justifies its price with advanced features.
Download ConnectWise SIEM vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a low setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while ConnectWise SIEM requires a higher initial investment but includes advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a low setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while ConnectWise SIEM requires a higher initial investment but includes advanced features.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect is known for its affordability, comprehensive threat detection, and behavioral analysis capabilities, with straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced threat hunting and automated responses, providing substantial ROI despite a slightly complex deployment.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
ESET Inspect requires a moderate setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is known for its relatively lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect requires a moderate setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is known for its relatively lower initial setup expenses.
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.2 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers real-time threat intelligence and automation for streamlined security management. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides robust threat detection using machine learning and behavioral analysis, offering advanced AI-driven features that users feel justify its higher cost.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a straightforward and lower setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR), offering an economical alternative. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more comprehensive setup, reflecting its ext...
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a straightforward and lower setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR), offering an economical alternative. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a more comprehensive setup, reflecting its ext...
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud
3.8 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is valued for comprehensive threat detection and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is preferred for robust protection mechanisms and cloud management features. Budget-conscious tech buyers might choose WithSecure, while those seeking extensive capabilities often select Kaspersky.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)