Zabbix Reviews

We use this solution to monitor, install and configure our networks, servers, virtual machines, and cloud services.

We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool.

This product is also easy to configure to our exact requirements.

We would like to see the addition of automatic push functionality to this product. This would save time when monitoring our servers and networks as, at present, we have to manually install the Zabbix agent on any hardware to be monitored.

We would also like inventory management functionality to be added to this solution.

We have been using this solution for three months.

We have occasionally experienced issues with the stability of this solution.

This is a scalable solution, but requires a lot of resources to be engaged in order for it to be scaled.

The setup process for this solution could be easier, as it requires a lot of configuration prior to deployment.

We implemented this solution in-house.

We would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

SNMP monitoring, source discovery, and alert triggering are most valuable.

It is a very easy product. Its dashboards are good and interactive. There is very good information.

We are able to use the Zabbix API for integration. We could integrate System Center Operations Manager and Zabbix with APIs to create a new product or alerting system. 

The System Center Operations Manager can be improved. 

Cloud monitoring can be a bit easier, and the Zabbix dashboard can be developed a little bit more.

There could be integration with Ansible Tower or AWX CLI.

I have been using this solution for five years.

It is stable.

It is very easy to scale. Many customers use Zabbix. We have one Zabbix center with 10 customers. We have a Zabbix proxy and centralized monitoring.

We have never used their technical support.

Its deployment is easy. Virtual appliances are very easy, and Zabbix agents are supported across different platforms, such as Linux and Windows. I would rate it five out of five in terms of the ease of the setup.

It is a good product. It is easy to integrate and use. We are happy with it.

I would rate it a nine out of 10.

We use Zabbix for monitoring server network equipment. The solution is deployed on-premises.

We have 10 technical engineers using the solution.

Zabbix allows us to monitor a lot of hardware equipment without any additional cost.

Most of the out-of-the-box features are valuable.

It would be helpful if they translated the documentation to Cyrillic languages.

We have been using this solution for five months.

From time to time, there are agents failing, but it's not often. I think it's stable.

The solution is being used every day because it's a monitoring system.

For our company, it is not scalable.

Support is given through tickets, but I'm not directly in contact with Zabbix support.

I have previously used SolarWinds.

Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months.

Implementation was completed by our engineers.

We pay the subscription for support by year.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

I can recommend Zabbix as a monitoring system.

We use Ubuntu for the distribution of our products and our web application firewall. Previously, I have also used a desktop version of Ubuntu on my laptop. We use this operating system for our Zabbix server as well, for monitoring, testing, and so on. 

We mostly use a server version, so it's only a command console. There's no graphical interface. 

This solution is deployed both on-premise and on cloud. 

Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software. 

As far as improvements, sometimes I get a bit frustrated when I move from a previous version to a new one because some configuration has changed—I need to investigate the documentation to deal with some configuration. But it doesn't take much time, so it's okay. 

I don't have any requests for additional features. 

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for a little over 10 years. 

Ubuntu is stable. 

This solution is scalable, but the scalability is more appropriate for hardware, not for the operating system. 

In my company, there are only a few users dealing with the desktop version of the Ubuntu operating system. As far as production environments and testing servers, there are maybe a few dozen users. 

We have never contacted technical support. We've never had any problems which demanded support from the Ubuntu teams. 

Before using Ubuntu Linux, I used CentOS, Debian, and Kali Linux. 

The installation is really easy. The timeframe depends on the hardware speed, so it's rather fast. I handled the installation by myself. 

We don't actually have a technical team specific to Ubuntu—they're all IT guys, so we all have good skills for doing things ourselves. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

I'm surprised that Ubuntu Linux has a paid license, even some supporting stuff included. We don't use the paid version, we only use the common edition. 

I rate Ubuntu Linux a 10 out of 10. It's really great. I recommend Ubuntu Linux to others who are looking into implementing this OS.