Evanios offers a comprehensive approach to IT system management, optimizing workflows through integration and automation tools tailored for IT operations. It enhances efficiency by streamlining data processes and providing a unified platform for system monitoring.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Evanios | 3.2% |
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 13.4% |
| Splunk AppDynamics | 10.1% |
| Other | 73.3% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | IT Operations Analytics | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Evanios vs Splunk Enterprise Security | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Evanios vs Splunk AppDynamics | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Evanios vs New Relic | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 4.2 | 13.4% | 94% | 403 interviewsAdd to research |
| Zabbix | 4.2 | N/A | 95% | 109 interviewsAdd to research |
Designed for IT environments, Evanios integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructures, offering streamlined workflows and effective data management. Its powerful automation tools facilitate incident response and problem resolution, ensuring that IT operations run smoothly and efficiently. Especially useful in complex systems, Evanios enhances operational coherence without disruption. Its focus on integration and automation ensures that users gain greater control and insight into their IT landscapes.
What are the key features of Evanios?Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Evanios to maintain robust IT systems. Financial institutions rely on its integration capabilities to ensure compliance and security, while healthcare providers benefit from its real-time monitoring to safeguard patient data integrity. Manufacturing sectors use Evanios to optimize production processes by reducing downtime through predictive maintenance.
Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Director at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I found Evanios excellent for integrating alerts from various systems. However, its high cost and poor de-duplication led to excessive noise and incidents, causing me to switch to PagerDuty for better features and value. |
| Systems Engineer at Datalink | 5.0 | Evanios helps me significantly reduce noise and costs, offering up to 90% noise reduction and valuable event correlation/manipulation. I wish for more complex correlation rules and an 'exit' option during event processing. |
| Sr Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees | 5.0 | Evanios provided a single pane of glass, reducing our incidents by 60% and dramatically lowering MTTR. Its powerful rules engine and excellent customer service made setup easy, delivering over 100% ROI by eliminating alert fatigue for our team. |
| Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I find rule development easy, enhancing event processing, incident automation, and correlation. Setup was straightforward, and support is great. My only concern is native domain separation, and a bottleneck was found with our monitoring tool. |
| Infrastructure Engineer II (Monitoring) | Compute Services at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | I find this product stable, easy to set up with strong integrations and responsive support. It significantly reduced IT hours and is a major improvement, though clearer system status and alert instructions would be beneficial. |
| Works at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | I found Evanios a highly stable, flexible, and easy-to-use solution with exceptional customer service and great ROI. Minor integration issues were quickly resolved, even with new solution development. Deployment was straightforward, vastly improving our event management. |
The solution ingests events that are generated by monitoring, and it creates incidents in ServiceNow using those events.
Monitoring tools like New Relic feed the alerts into Evanios. Evanios then creates the incident and de-duplicates the events.
There were 15 people who received incidents from Evanios. They were end users. One or two people were needed for maintenance.
The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you may have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops. Splunk, New Relic, and Grafana may be generating different sets of alerts. Evanios is able to ingest alerts from different systems.
The price could be cheaper. That was one reason why we switched to PagerDuty. We wanted to switch to something that provided the same features but at a lower cost.
We also switched because PagerDuty provided other features like integration with ServiceNow and the scheduling of engineers. Evanios was only for event integration.
Evanios created too much noise. For every alert, it would create an incident. We received too many alerts and incidents from monitoring. It wasn't able to intelligently ingest alerts. It created 4,000 incident tickets in a month, which didn't reflect what was happening. If we received an alert, the synthetic monitoring and volume drop would give us the same alert.
Evanios should include alert ingestion and de-duplication of alerts and noise reduction. We couldn't have people resolving each and every incident.
PagerDuty gives us reports on how many alerts are being ingested, how many are noise, how many have bigger incidents, and which of the alerts are creating noise. It would be helpful if Evanios had metrics on the amount of alerts and types of the alerts to show which ones were serious incidents and which ones were just noise.
I used this solution for two and a half years.
We didn't have any problems with stability.
The solution is scalable.
I also have experience with PagerDuty. They have good rules in terms of de-duplication, noise reduction, and alert integration. Evanios is a little more customizable. PagerDuty provides all of the rules, and it's not possible to change something.
PagerDuty's features are very rich, and the setup is clear. Basically, you have an endpoint and expose the endpoint in PagerDuty. PagerDuty is able to pick the alerts using those endpoints, so the setup is easier. The configuration for Evanios was a little better, and PagerDuty had a lot of other features that we needed.
I wasn't involved in the initial setup, but the integration of newer alerts was not a big deal at all.
I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.
For someone who is interested in using this solution, my advice is that if you can take care of de-duplication, Evanios will be useful for you, but the de-duplication has to be dealt with outside of the product. If you don't have a third party taking care of de-duplication, it's not the product for you.
Our primary use case for this tool is to reduce noise and costs within our business.
Evanios has improved our organization by allowing us to see the forest through the trees. We are able to correlated and reduce complex information. It provides context in areas where context is not able to be provided and is needed.
Correlate and dedupe rules provide the most out of box value to us, but the ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want, it is invaluable.
More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically.
We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed. So, if we find a condition within an event, and we no longer want to process it, we can stop it rather than have it filtered out of the rules.
Our primary use case was to have a single pane of glass for all the alerts firing from multiple monitoring systems within our IT landscape. Also, another primary goal was to reduce the noise and bubble up actionable alerts for our IT Operations teams to be able to handle. Reduction in noise, reduction in alert fatigue and effective alert correlation and deduplication were our main goals.
Evanios has helped us reduce our incident count by about 60% in just three months into implementation. We are seeing great ROI right from the first month. Our Ops were processing about 5000 alerts a day and now with Evanios its in a few hundreds. Also we have seen a dramatic reduction in MTTR for incidents as we are able to present all the related alerts and paint the entire picture of the reason for the outage in minutes as opposed to hours and sometimes days previously. It has helped us get all our engineering and ops teams on a common platform where they can collaborate well and that has helped boost the teams morale a lot. The automated RCA is a game changer. Evanios had made Alert fatigue and swivel chair syndrome a thing of the past for our Ops teams and they couldn't be happier.
The Evanios rules engine is the most valuable piece. Setting up rules is very easy, super fun and packs a lot of power when it comes to business logic and alert processing logic. They help us train the product to adapt and work in our complex distributed environment. There is nothing that you can think of and cannot be done with the rules engine.
Another piece of the product that has been built very robustly is the agent architecture. It very reliable, fault tolerant highly configurable.
The product could be improved in providing ROI reports and reports on effectiveness of correlation etc. Rest its a rock star product and can bring value in any kind of environment where operations teams are dealing with alert fatigue.
No issues. We have not had any issues since the last 1 year that we have implemented it.
No issues at all. Evanios is highly scalable and performant.
The customer service has been the key differentiator here. Evanios customer service is highly technical and they understand your requirements really fast and provide you with the fox even faster. They are very friendly and easy to work with.
Yes we used our home grown solution which was getting to complex and unmanageable so we had to fin something more scalable.
The setup is super simple and easy. Evanios implementation team helped configure it to suite our needs making it almost painless.
We implemented in-house with Evanios support on the call. It was super easy and seamless.
Our ROI has been over 100%.
Evanios is super easy to setup. It took us just 2 weeks to setup configure and get going with the product which was a big plus considering the vastness and complexity of our environment. Also the Evanios support and implementation teams are rock stars. They made the process super easy, smooth and painless. They helped us build some custom integrations with some of the toolsets in our environment in record time and we were able to realize gains in 2 weeks. Evanios is very competitively priced against its peers and cheaper in many cases.
We did look into BigPanda and Moogsoft. But we wanted something that was more catered towards ITSM driven event management so we chose Evanios.
In closing I would say Evanios is the best solution you can find for your IT Ops teams hands down. If you are worries about alert fatigue and the swivel chair syndrome this will alleviate both in no time. Definitely worth the investment for any enterprise that wants to bring some sanity and order to the chaotic world of IT Ops.
It is very easy to develop rules and logic for event processing.
It splits the rules up into types (Transform, Dedupe, Significance, Trigger Incident etc.) and displays the fields/attributes specific to that type of rule.
Also, the condition filters are straight forward for someone with any ServiceNow experience.
Creation of incidents was previously a manual process with lots of copy and paste, swivel chair, mistakes, and missed events. Everything is now automated with events correlated and deduplicated, as well as crosschecks against scheduled change outages.
I have used it for six months.
There were initially some minor issues around domain separation in ServiceNow.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
I have not encountered any scalability issues. Configuration was tweaked to cater for throughput but a bottleneck was subsequently identified with monitoring tool.
Technical support is great, very switched on and always responsive, despite being on the other side of the planet (US vs Australia).
I did not previously use a different solution.
Initial setup was relatively straightforward if you have the correct people assigned (Monitoring tool SME and ITSM tool SME).
We implemented it with assistance from Evanios directly.
Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options.
Maintainability of a single pane of glass for a NOC must be easy and not cause downtime. Deduplication, ease of use and software-less interface integration with ServiceNow makes it easy for teams to use the product.
We launched it in production three months ago.
We encountered minor deployment issues relating to building custom integrations not yet built but overall, it was smooth.
The product has been much more stable than the product we previously used.
We have not yet encountered any scalability issues.
Customer service is highly recommended and responsive.
Technical Support:Other than asking a few questions to our consultant assigned to us at build, we have not had to call technical support yet.
We previously used CA Spectrum. We switched because the software interface was very bulky, it required a very large network footprint and cost.
Initial setup was straightforward mainly because of the many integration points we could create with the software.
The vendor team was very courteous and professional. They ensured we were ready to deploy at go-live.
So far, the amount of IT hours to maintain and support has dropped dramatically.
This is much cheaper than ServiceNow's built-in product and the vendor is very flexible in helping you pick the right solution you need.
Before choosing this product, we evaluated BigPanda.
With its ease of use and setup, I wish this product had come out before my company bought CA Spectrum.
Our previous event management solution had a complicated implementation (and thus required a good bit of historical knowledge to support) and was unstable. Evanios is much easier to understand once given a brief overview of the product.
It's been much more stable than our previous solution and we have been able to integrate 4-5 products (and counting) which were not able to be integrated before.
Troubleshooting of events from monitoring systems is also much easier and no longer requires very specific knowledge of different scripting\programming languages, logging in to multiple separate servers, etc.
As with any new software implementation, during the integration we found a couple of minor issues when integrating certain products (such as SCOM). However, each time this happened Evanios was very quick to identify the bug we were seeing, patch it and provide the new update set for us to install.
Also, during the evaluation of Evanios we found that they already had integrations with most of our larger monitoring tools, however they also stated that they would be able to create update sets to integrate certain products we used that they did not currently support. This proved to be very valuable for us because they were able to become an even better fit for our organization by creating update sets\integrations for PRTG, Quest Foglight, TIBCO and Thousand Eyes as well.
I have used it for nine months.
We have not encountered any issues; deployment was straightforward. We planned with each individual team that was sending us data and were able to get their system integrated quickly, accomplishing each group's requirements.
We have not encountered any stability issues. Evanios has been 100% more stable than our previous event management solution. This is one of the main reasons we moved to Evanios; issues with stability in our prior platform.
No issues with scalability. Rule and filter creation allows for very broad or very specific scope, whichever is required for the situation. This allows you to create a small number of rules to perform a function across all systems that will send alerts to Evanios, or get very specific where required to accomplish needed tasks.
Customer service is exceptional. During our time implementing and using Evanios, we have had very fast response times for support requests as well as feature enhancements.
Technical Support:Technical support is exceptional; very fast response times and knowledgeable support staff. Any issues we have experienced were identified and a solution proposed\made available for implementation quickly.
The product we used previously was complicated in its implementation and required specific configuration for each event you wanted to generate. It was also unstable and had a high cost. Evanios is simpler in its implementation; however, we also have much more capability than we did before due to the wide range of rules that can be created, as well as the ServiceNow integration. Our previous solution was purely SNMP, so Evanios has given us much more flexibility and allowed us to get more reliable data into ServiceNow.
Initial setup was straightforward. We followed Evanios' guidance, fitting each product we needed to integrate into their rule methodology. We have a large number of monitoring systems integrated with Evanios; however, it is easy to focus on any one integration when developing\working with events.
We used an in-house team and purchased PS hours from Evanios to assist with the design and implementation.
Incredible ROI: As soon as we switched to Evanios, we started seeing events that were being unknowingly suppressed in our previous solution. We have much more reliable communication between systems because our prior solution was SNMP only. We also have a growing number of systems integrated with Evanios, which were not possible to integrate with our previous solution. We also have less downtime due to the increased reliability, so fewer missed events, which is huge.
We had some specific contractual requirements for the purchase and Evanios worked with us to be sure we could come to an agreement that worked for both companies.
Before choosing this product, we evaluated BigPanda and the ServiceNow Event Management module.
It is a great solution. I have very much enjoyed working with the software and company. I would also add that each group we have worked with internally to integrate their solution has been very pleased with the capabilities and ease of use of the software.
