| Senior Technical Officer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | I find this product excellent for military control units, saving 50% of my budget due to its great UI, easy use, and fast learning curve. Customer support is superior, though I'd like more RF capabilities. |
| Works at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I use this for lab instrumentation, simplifying programming with its connectivity and user-friendliness. While the software and pricing could improve, its integrated functionality and good customer service make it a valuable solution. |
| Supply Chain Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | Our high-speed system relies on these reliable boards with a good UI. While technical support is good, I desire more speed, reduced size, and more competitive pricing for future needs. |
| Signal and Power Integrity Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | We use NetVue for high-speed digital design. Its GUI makes programming easy, and most functions are useful. While there's a 1-2 month learning curve, I recommend it to colleagues. |
| Signal Integrity Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use LabVIEW for high-speed test automation, which saves me substantial time. Although it had a steep learning curve, its excellent automation and reasonable price make it recommendable. I just wish for better feature integration and driver compatibility. |
| Applications Engineer at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | We use National Instruments STS for low-cost IoT product testing, appreciating its fast integration and mature UI. While excellent for RF, analog, and digital, they need more 5G RF focus. It's a great value alternative to expensive legacy systems. |
| Test Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use this for high-speed signal probing, finding its intuitive UI and on-screen features helpful. I wish for more internal documentation and a touchscreen. I recommend it as helpful, with a low learning curve, rating it 8/10. |
| Works at a tech vendor | 4.5 | We use this for hardware QA; it's easy, self-running, and quickly finds defects, saving investment. However, the initial price is steep, which is our main concern for this otherwise valuable tool. |