What is our primary use case?
We used Actifio for two things. One was for backups, and the other one was to refresh test environments with production data. For example, we have a production environment and around 17 or 18 test environments where the functional team and the development team want to make different changes and test them.
Previously, it used to take us about 8-10 hours, but with Actifio, the setup allowed us to do it in half an hour. Additionally, it also resulted in significant space savings. Previously, we required around 150 terabytes for 17 environments like that, but now we are able to achieve almost 90% savings.
The other thing was that our database in production was around 8 to 10 terabytes, but one of the other federal agencies they have a data warehouse that is almost 100 to 200 terabytes or even more. They mentioned that without Actifio, they wouldn't be able to do refreshes in terms of time and space.
What is most valuable?
The most important feature for us was the time savings achieved through refreshes.
The other thing that was very good was the support team. Initially, when we set up the product, they didn't have the functionality for refreshing PDBs. However, they worked with us to make it happen before we went live. Not only the functionality, but the support team was great. The people who were supporting us were highly skilled. As someone with many years of database experience, I was amazed.
What needs improvement?
The area they could improve was when we were in Azure cloud, and Actifio got bought by Google, they stopped supporting us. So that's an area they could improve.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Actifio was very stable. Whenever they identified bugs, they would promptly provide us with patches. I also want to mention that I work for CGI, a consulting company. Our hosting platform is perfectly suitable for our database backups, but Actifio also offers backups for various other platforms, including VMs and more. So their product is used to back up our hosting platform, which is a big plus.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is scalable. However, to ensure optimal scalability, you need to work on the underlying hardware and resources. For example, if your network has limited bandwidth, you need to identify and address the bottlenecks by increasing resources. The product is designed to be scalable, but it requires attention to the underlying resources to ensure sufficient capacity.
For example, they have the appliance on a given server. And that server would work till a certain stage. Then if you see that the resources are low or have reached the capacity, you have to next level of the VM, like, in terms of if there is a memory or CPU or from the appliance to wherever you are hosting, wherever you are presenting that virtual disk, that network traffic, if you see that network traffic is reaching capacity, then you have to add additional. So it's scalable from the design perspective, but you have to work on the underlying resources to make sure they also have that capacity.
How are customer service and support?
I was very impressed with the customer service and support team.
How would you rate customer service and support?
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex, but the team is very supportive. When you sign the licensing agreement with them, they include a certain amount of support, including the initial setup. So it's not simple to set up, but with the support provided, it was very smooth sailing. We didn't encounter any significant hurdles. If there were any issues, they promptly looked into them and rectified them. The support is part of the licensing cost they provide in the initial stage.
What was our ROI?
In terms of time, refreshes that used to take 10 to 12 hours were done in half an hour. And in terms of storage in the test environment, it went down by almost 90%. Previously, we would require 150 to 200 terabytes, but now we are down to around 20 or 30 terabytes of space.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have implemented data management tools. Instead of data masking, we were using Actifio for data management. However, Actifio was not supported in other environments. So, we implemented an architecture using ECFS from Oracle.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten because Actifio pioneer in that field. And they were the cheapest as well as they were constantly innovating.