Adobe Commerce Reviews

There are two separate companies that I've worked with. One was part of an off-price fashion marketplace when Adobe Commerce was our e-commerce platform. It was just one part of a much larger ecosystem. Currently, I'm working with a furniture brand, a leading UK furniture brand, who again use Adobe Commerce as their e-commerce platform.

What I appreciate most about Adobe Commerce is the customizable element, as absolutely everything in Adobe Commerce is customizable. Both businesses that we worked for had very complex use cases and business operations, which means we needed to be able to have a platform that we could get under the hood of everything and customize where necessary. 

From using Adobe Commerce, it comes back to the customizable element, being able to satisfy very complex business use cases. While platforms such as Shopify are evolving very quickly, at the time, they just could not handle the use case and the business case that we have.

We don't use the reporting tools from Adobe Commerce as we have our own reporting infrastructure.

Adobe Commerce can be complex in terms of ease of use, as it's such a large platform. From the development side, you can customize everything, but that does require substantial resources. When working on Adobe Commerce, I would want Adobe Commerce specialist developers. Although it's all built in PHP, and there are many PHP developers, I would want Adobe Commerce specialist developers working on it because they have knowledge about what to customize and more importantly, what's best not to touch.

There are always site speed issues with Adobe Commerce. It seems to be an ongoing issue with performance. When comparing it to Shopify, you don't tend to need to worry about that, but with Adobe Commerce, it remains an ongoing issue. Additionally, there are all the upgrades, which can be quite painful, including the regular patches, both on the open-source and licensed version, on-premises.

The initial setup for migrating to Adobe Commerce from another e-commerce platform is not straightforward; it's a very big job. The pricing for Adobe Commerce varies dramatically. Quite often, you see their list prices and then you are able to negotiate very hefty discounts. My understanding is that they're moving away from heavily discounting. Although our license where I am at the moment is heavily discounted, I'm hearing that they're trying to move away from that practice.

I have been using Adobe Commerce for about the last ten years.

Adobe Commerce is stable. It depends on your setup and how it sits in your larger ecosystem. The stability is dependent on your implementation. We've found it to be stable.

Scalability for Adobe Commerce is very good, and is a genuine enterprise platform.

We have very little interaction with the support team from Adobe. We work with an Adobe Commerce-accredited agency, a development agency. All of our support is handled by our agency and by developers and support people there. Very rarely do we or they ever need to go to Adobe for any further support.

Negative

I have previously used a different solutions.

The initial setup for migrating to Adobe Commerce from one platform is not straightforward; it's a very big job.

We work with a development agency for implementation and support.

For us and the license we pay and the business we have, it's worth the money as a tool. I can't say it's the same for every business. A big factor in the licensing is the amount of store views you have. If you have multiple store views and storefronts, that will increase the license quite significantly.

I would recommend Adobe Commerce to other people depending on the business use case. If I'm being honest, most retail businesses are probably better off on Shopify.

I haven't used the AI capabilities much. We don't use any other Adobe products. We are a customer of Adobe, not a partner. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Adobe Commerce a 7.

My use cases for Adobe Commerce involve projects with specific customers and different industries. Most of them were projects where customers were migrating from either an open-source version of Adobe Commerce or from another vendor, and they wanted to get more flexibility, so they moved to Adobe Commerce. I was responsible for the leadership of the project and support and maintenance as well.

I am currently using the AI capabilities of Adobe Commerce. We are trying to experiment a bit on the value that we can get out of it and also provide to the customer. It is still in a POC phase as of now.

What I appreciate best about Adobe Commerce is the flexibility to adapt to the scenario that you're looking for. The possibility to add multiple modules from third-party vendors is very useful as well. These are the two most important features I can think of currently.

The benefits I have seen from using Adobe Commerce include being able to successfully deliver what the customer needs in terms of capabilities, performance, and user experience. The journey to get there has not been easy, but in the last few months, there have been many improvements and new ways to use Adobe Commerce. Now it is a bit easier than before, so it gives the customer the chance to be more creative about what they want or the user experience they're planning to provide to the end user.

An additional feature I would want to see included in the next release relates to integrating or moving data from one environment to another. There is no automated way to do that, so if we have a platform with multiple environments, such as staging, pre-prod, and production, moving content is not automated and has to be done manually, which takes significant time and effort, especially in a migration project with hundreds of pages.

It would be beneficial to see an automated way to handle this, not just for content, but also for customer data. Moving from one version to another, even within Adobe Commerce, requires transformation of the data and many validations. I would appreciate a tool that would facilitate this process to a point where it could be automated at least 90% of the time, allowing focus on ensuring data cleanliness rather than customizing or cleaning data manually.

I have been using Adobe Commerce since 2019.

The support teams from Adobe are, from my perspective, the least favorite part. The support team is struggling; when I request support, they're very slow, communication is difficult, and we don't get the answers we're looking for. They're not the greatest support team. I would rate their support a five.

Positive

To have Adobe Commerce out of the box is very straightforward. To actually get it ready for orders, it takes time and effort.

I have experience regarding pricing and costs. Adobe Commerce is not inexpensive. It is not set up for customers with low budgets. Depending on the version you're implementing, the environment will not be inexpensive either because Adobe Commerce is heavy, requiring good environment, processing, and memory, which is expensive. However, once you get the environment you're looking for, scaling is not as expensive as other platforms. In the beginning, it requires a significant investment with many necessary purchases, but in the long term, you will not spend much on scalability.

It is not really an easy tool to use. Anyone can learn how to use it, and it is intuitive in that sense. However, it has extensive functionality and many configurations that must be done before getting your first order, so it takes time to learn. There are many features that remain unknown until you need to set them up. It is not easy to learn how to use it completely.

I have used the integration with Adobe products specifically with Experience Manager, and we are using Builder, Edge Delivery Services, and Catalog Services. Many products can be integrated, and the integration is very straightforward with Adobe products. The complicated part is integrating with other vendors, which can be challenging, but once figured out, it becomes straightforward.

I have used the advanced reporting tools multiple times and the multilingual capabilities extensively. The multilingual capabilities have been very helpful. There are many ways to implement it, and all the features that Adobe Commerce has around that are very beneficial.

From my experience and based on the customers I have worked with and their unique business approaches, I definitely see the value of Adobe Commerce. It is not easy and very complex, but I do not know another tool with the same level of capabilities that Adobe Commerce has today.

We are partners of Adobe. I have used old versions of WooCommerce, Shopify, and a plugin for WordPress as well.

I would recommend Adobe Commerce to others if they need the requirements and their business model supports a tool of this caliber. Overall, I would rate the tool a seven out of ten.

I mostly use Adobe Illustrator and Adobe Photoshop for various tasks, and for this, I need to subscribe to Adobe Commerce. For that purpose, I am using them.

I don't use Adobe Commerce much—just only for the subscription. I think for subscription purposes, it is good.

I think it is adequate because Adobe Commerce has many software options. With Adobe-related software, I can purchase every software from here and I can use it, so I think it is perfect for using software.

The price of Adobe Commerce is very high, actually. If it were possible to have a free version or a limited version, that would be good for users. At this moment, it is in a very high range, and it is very difficult to use it without one. I just use it sometimes for only one month or two months. But I could not use it all the time because the price is very high.

Different types of users utilize Adobe products, such as Adobe Illustrator or Adobe Photoshop. Some are professionals, and others are small businesses. If the price is low and there are also some limited versions and a free version, that will increase the number of users.

I would refer Adobe Commerce to other people, but at this moment, its price is very high, so it is difficult to refer it. I mostly suggest Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop. When they try to buy it, it is difficult. However, someone might use a cracked version or some other version to get by. I use the Adobe Illustrator paid version sometimes. When I came to Japan, I started using the paid version, but previously I also used the cracked version and sometimes the paid version. In most countries, people are somehow managing with the cracked version, but if the price is low then everyone will use the subscription-based main version.

I started using Adobe Commerce in 2012.

The stability of Adobe Commerce is adequate.

The scalability is adequate.

I don't need any support from Adobe, so I don't have any experience with it.

Positive

I mostly use Adobe Commerce. I don't use any other solution.

It is easy to use.

I am a customer.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Adobe Commerce a 9.

Magento replaced one of the old platforms at HP, where I used to work, for e-commerce at HP Broadcom stores, which was pretty much our front-end platform for e-commerce. HP's online stores are hosted on Magento nowadays. We had to develop many capabilities along with Magento's capabilities, including, for example, payment gateway integration, rating reviews, suppliers, and fulfillment partners integration. So we did a kind of end-to-end setup of Magento from a commerce perspective in some of the countries, and with all the peculiarities of each country, we had to make Magento adaptable for countries like Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia. So, we had to meet with all the legal and customer experience needed for those specific countries where we deployed Magento. Though it was pretty much the same store, for some kind of improvements or enhancements, we had to do something local from a business perspective or for legal and tax-related purposes.

Magento is very flexible, and it's one of the biggest e-commerce platforms. I would say that there are a lot of system integrators worldwide, which is great. So, I think you can have access and higher expert system integrators all over the world. Sometimes, the system integrators feel the need for Magento to be more customizable. It's a very agnostic platform, so you need to customize everything. For some kinds of features, it probably could be a good idea to have the solution customized so that it can be an out-of-the-box solution. But it's a good platform, pretty much from my perspective. I'm not a technical person, but we had some kind of late response in page loading, let's say page load speed. I don't know if it's from Magento or based on the solution that was built by the system integrator. I think it is a mix of both. Getting a platform that is really fast is something important for our customers. So we need to make sure that every time we are building a store, we are going to deliver very good page load speed performance.

I have experience with Magento. My company has deployed Magento in six countries. I am a customer of Magento.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I think stability can be improved, and I don't know if it is because of the way it is built for us or because of Magento as a solution in general since everything is made tailor-made in Magento.

The scalability of Magento is pretty high since it's a big platform. You have a lot of providers working on Magento and a lot of embedded systems that come with Magento already, so let's say the APIs for those vendors for whom Magento is already built.

My company had contacted the support due to the page load speed time. We had a couple of meetings with Magento's technical team to understand what was happening because the system integrator that built the solution was not able to identify the main reason for that, and we had to involve the technical team from Magento that made a deep dive diagnostic process. To take the conclusion that this is something related to the design of the codes that we had, then it was part of the system integrator issue or problem.

Speaking about the support team of Magento, they provided a very detailed and good perspective on what was wrong.

Regarding setup, let me give you my example. So we worked with the business team and product team in HP, responsible for the deployment. So, getting the details and the setup was very hard with the business team. The interaction between the product team and the business team and all the requirements that the business team, let's say, was providing to the product team, in the beginning, was hard in terms of getting the setup. I don't think it's because of Magento, and to be honest, I believe, it was because of the system integrator that we got to use it. So, there are differences in the quality of system integrators. Depending on who you are working with, probably the experience would be much, much easier. In our case, we were not working as the best integrator, so we had a hard time in the beginning. But when all the problems and the product setup were solved, and we launched the platform, we still saw some issues, but it was not something that made us think that it was not something that was going to work. There were small issues, and we had to work hard with the IT team and the business team to get all those sorted till we got a maturity or a learning cure. The learning curve for getting everything up and running was quite long, but again, it was not because of Magento. It was because of the system integrator.

To those planning to use the solution, I would say that the selection of the system integrator is critical because you need to, you know, build your solution in detail and very well done to really get the maximum from the platform. So the system integrator selection is a key process. Also, the business requirements should be very, very detailed.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

At our company, we use Adobe Commerce to support a couple of system integrations. The solution is used for real-time data fetching from the back-end of SAP ERP solution. Our organization deploys Adobe Commerce for various system environments. 

Adobe Commerce can be used by a chemical manufacturing company, which has customers around the globe. The company uses the solution to showcase sample products so that they can be shipped from one region to another. The solution helps with competitive pricing, material quality, and product delivery to gain an advantage over competitors. 

At our company, we implement data analysis to understand the business use cases and the functionality requirements. At our company, we've been trying to reciprocate the solution configuration as per global standards, it's been a challenge for us to initiate designs.

In our organization, we try to remain up to date with the market standards so that customizations can be implemented more effectively. The solution takes a huge amount of time to complete the root cause analysis. 

I have been using Adobe Commerce for three years. 

It's a stable product. 

Our company depends on the vendor to ensure the solution's scalability. For any changes from the vendor, our company team analyzes the alterations required in our organization and the impact on timelines. For any scalability implementations, both the vendor and client should collaborate to understand the scaling impact and the timeline factors. Around 120 customers of our organization are using the solution across the world. 

Only once our company escalated an issue to customer support, there was a breach on the threads regarding message approval; it took 24 hours to get the system refreshed. After the aforementioned system, our company optimized the solution to not occupy the entire threads from any Salesforce systems. I would rate the tech support a nine out of ten. 

Positive

The initial setup is not straightforward, as it varies depending on the business use cases. If experienced professionals are handling the deployment then there are not many obstacles. I would rate the initial setup of Adobe Commerce as nine out of ten. At our company, we work with the cloud version of Adobe Commerce. 

We used a Waterfall model in our organization, deriving standard SDLC life cycle processes to deploy Adobe Commerce. The solution's initial deployment took around eight months in our company. As part of the initial setup, 11 professionals were required from our company team. The product can be maintained effortlessly. 

There is a standard functionality, which can be all the data including raw material information, which are very easily available through Adobe Commerce, and the same data will be integrated and updated from SAP to pull the information back to Salesforce so that the users can view all the details.

The samples' approvals can be checked, and the solution provides the exact standard delivery timelines. So, each piece of information can be viewed on the Adobe and Salesforce platforms.

At our company, the solution needs to be customized and integrated for varying business clients based on their functionality needs. I would recommend that others use Adobe Commerce based on the perspective of feasibility and functionality.

Someone looking to adopt Adobe Commerce should analyze the TCO, deployment landscape, and infrastructure to decide if it's the right one for the business use case. I would rate the solution a nine out of ten overall. 

The solution is useful in the area of e-commerce.

E-commerce is a tough area. E-commerce platforms improve over a period of time. I only like the fact that the product has improved over time.

The hardware requirements of the tool should be made better, as it is a solution that is very heavy on the servers, and it makes it expensive to host many servers.

I have been using Adobe Commerce for twelve years. My company operates as a reseller and implementer partner of Adobe Commerce.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The product does have some issues related to bugs from time to time, but Adobe offers an upgrade to the solution's version.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven to eight out of ten. The product is scalable, but you need to have knowledge on how to do it.

My company's clients who use the product consist of small, medium, and large enterprises.

The support services offered by Adobe are slow. The solution's support team does not consist of very knowledgeable or experienced people. My company's technical team has more knowledge than the support team of Adobe. Sometimes, it takes weeks for Adobe to provide a solution to our company's issues. I rate the technical support a two out of ten.

Negative

I rate the initial setup phase an eight and a half on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises and the cloud model. The product is available with an on-premises licence but you don't need to deploy it locally and would prefer to get it deployed on the cloud. Adobe also has a cloud version of the product. The on-premises version of the tool is hosted on cloud.

The solution can be deployed in a few minutes.

There is definitely a return on investment from the use of the product, especially depending on how users manage their e-commerce stores.

The product offers an open-source version, which is free. There are licensing options for Adobe Commerce's cloud version. Depending on what you want from the product, the solution can be available for free. Compared to SAP and Salesforce, Adobe Commerce is cheap, but compared to some other products, it may be expensive. The product offers a free version to users.

The customization capabilities of Adobe Commerce are great. You can customize it however you like.

Live Search is a service from Adobe Commerce that I found to be the most useful, along with some other third-party extensions and other recommended tools by Adobe. The lightweight developments by frontend teams in Adobe Commerce are also useful.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I feel that it is a highly adaptive solution.

Users can customize the product, and it can be made available for free. It is not a very expensive tool, but it offers premium services and is robust. The product offers a lot more than what users need. The product offers stability.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to build a tailor-made website and e-commerce system. It's working with internal platforms and operations on the platform.

Adobe helps clients post their sales online and in eCommerce. It has filers and everything related to orders online. 

Adobe Commerce is a robust e-commerce platform. It stands alongside industry leaders like Salesforce Commerce Cloud, offering a hybrid API model. It is competitively priced among its peers along with flexibility as an open-source platform.

Additionally, Adobe Commerce provides AI features, including a tool called Insight for AI-driven product recommendations. Many clients continue to leverage this AI capability to enhance their e-commerce experience, making it a popular choice among businesses. It has an open architecture, user-friendly interface, and integration with other e-commerce tools. This adaptability extends to engagement-focused tools and services, ensuring a comprehensive and enriched customer experience on Adobe Commerce-powered websites.

Adobe Commerce is more suitable for large businesses and enterprises. Many companies, including medium-sized ones, also use the open-source version. Large databases and enterprises opt for Adobe Commerce with a license to access additional B2C and B2B commerce features. One significant drawback of Commerce is its substantial size, which allows for extensive customization but also elongates the development process for an e-commerce website. Compared to other platforms, pricing is high for customer support and upgrades. Adobe Commerce can handle various tasks, but its complexity often requires training for users to navigate effectively.

I have been using Adobe Commerce since 2017.

If they want to launch a website quickly, they can use Adobe Commerce. They offer online templates with minimal customization. Magento has a dedicated department that manages e-commerce websites. They possess numerous teams, including services, warehousing, and fulfillment, allowing for customization based on panel features tailored to their needs. We then implement these changes for the companies. Currently, not many companies in Vietnam opt for platforms like Shopify, as it lacks flexibility for customization.

Adobe Commerce used to be Magento. Adobe bought the Magento company. It has been upgraded every year. They have had many versions. Initially, there was Magento 1, then Magento 2, and now it's Magento 2.4.7. There are many versions with various features. For example, if you purchase Magento, it already comes with all the features for an e-commerce website out of the box, but customization allows for further enhancement. You can add more features or create a marketplace to purchase numerous modules and extensions. There's a lot that can be done with Magento because of its flexibility. If needed, we can perform any customizations with it.

Adobe Commerce doesn't provide direct client support but facilitates assistance through its network of partners worldwide. These partners, including tier partners in various regions like Vietnam, are equipped to handle projects, warranties, and customization issues related to the Adobe Commerce platform. Clients can rely on these partners for support with any technical challenges they encounter.

Adobe acquired Magento a few years ago. We also work with Shopify and do projects on other platforms in Vietnam. It’s one of the biggest e-commerce platforms. In terms of users, many small companies and individuals prefer using Shopify because it's very easy to use. It is a SaaS platform with a subscription model.

Adobe Commerce is more of a platform as a service. With Shopify, you must pay and set up the subscription fee. You don't necessarily need any customizations to have a functional website. You can customize it, but the options are more limited than what you can do with Magento. You must approach it as a project with a longer deployment timeline, including planning and implementation. You can have a live website with Shopify within one or two weeks. Magento may take two or three months to complete.

The initial setup is very easy. It took us one or two days and cost about to set up the servers and deploy a website on Adobe Commerce. However, it can be challenging for others who don’t know much.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

Adobe has defined its license into tiers, and that is based on the Gross Merchandise Value of the client through the website or platform. For instance, if you have less than one million USD GMV/ year, you will have a different price than five million basis points. Additionally, clients can negotiate with Adobe Commerce on the license based on their GMV.

Adobe Commerce has a large community. Additionally, there are numerous potential developers worldwide because Adobe Commerce offers certification for them.

If you purchase a license, other people can support you a lot. We have tier partners everywhere in the world. Even in Vietnam, we have a few partners already. We do the projects and handle warranties. We can connect them with some complexity and handling if there are any issues with the core platforms. We do a lot of customizations. We need to help the client with the warranty on any other customizations. It's not only mechanical, but it's entirely under the Commerce.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The product's most valuable aspect is its standardization. It allows easy integration with other systems through various plugins. Additionally, there is a great community for support.

The limited availability of experienced developers can make the product costly to maintain.

I have been working with Adobe Commerce for about five years.

The product is quite stable.

Our organization has approximately 30 to 40 users of this platform. We operate it in a Docker environment with around forty processors and 40 to 80 gigabytes of RAM distributed across eight virtual machines. 

It is scalable. We use it in a Docker environment, which allows for easy scaling.

I have experience with Commerce, a .NET OpenSource platform.

It is easy to maintain the system. 

Our in-house team handles product maintenance.  

We transitioned from the platform's commercial license to the open-source version, which helped optimize costs without affecting our sales.

The platform allows us to easily integrate with service vendors, such as delivery services and payment systems. It enables us to develop our front-end solutions using Magento as the commerce engine. It is a good product, but finding experienced developers in our country can take time, making it challenging and costly to maintain.

I rate it an eight out of ten. 

We use this product mainly for E-commerce websites.

Generally, the development time is quite extensive in Magento. This is not headless architecture, which we typically need for CMS. Headless architecture makes it very easy for content to be made available across multiple platforms. Because Magento does not have headless architecture, you get stuck with one platform, one architecture. Magneto is monolithic in character, making it difficult for us to scale up very high quickly on the content side.

In addition, launching new websites and mobile apps across different platforms is quite a tedious task with Magento while it is much easier with others. This is once again due to how they have structured it as a product platform. I've felt these kinds of things make the overall cost of ownership higher for Magento. Even though the platform in itself comes free for community addition, the cost of development, change requests, and the maintenance just becomes too much for the long-term and it slows you down quite a bit.

In the next release, I would like to see hyper-personalization. 

I have been using this solution for longer than five years.

I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the scalability of this solution a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being low scalability and 10 being high scalability. It's good for small to medium enterprises, but not as great for large enterprises. Currently, we have around 30 people using this solution.

I would rate the technical support a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup a five, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the hardest and 10 being the easiest.

The deployment is done through an in-house team.

When it comes to the pricing, the community addition is free, but there's an enterprise addition which of course is paid for. With the community addition, you need to develop a lot of things from scratch. 

We evaluated other solutions like Salesforce, SAP Commerce Cloud, and Oracle, but we chose Magento purely because of the cost.

Magento is painful to manage.

The issue we generally face is that Magento is very resource intensive. So unless you have the right resource in the organization, it becomes very difficult to manage Magento's platform.

We have felt that, compared to the other products like Salesforce or SP Commerce Cloud – which are maybe a little more rigid than Magento because of obviously being a product versus an open source addition from Magento – things become a little more challenging in the other sides, but then they come with a lot of interesting features. So integrations with most of the so-called third-party integrations come in.

Things become easier with other platforms, much more than Magento in some cases because of the pre-built integrations. While in Magento, you need to build everything digitally from scratch for most of the use cases which we are driving. So for example, only channel journeys, which you want to drive very, very seamlessly across multiple touchpoints for the customers, don't come easily with Magento while they come very seamlessly with the likes of Salesforce or the hybrids from SAP. That is why we have been debating what the right approach for us is. On the plus side, when you build everything from scratch in Magento, you can do magic with it. But it can become too tedious. On the other hand, we have less flexibility but much quicker rollouts for mobile apps and websites on the other platforms.

Overall, I would rate this solution a six, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. The reason for this rating is just the overall experience with delays and launches of development cycles, apps, and maintenance costs, and it not being easily integrated. All of these things bring the rating down.

Adobe Commerce is where most of our product inventory information is shared, including price books and all logic and conditions about how to display a variable differently to different users. A piece of Adobe Commerce is used with a bit of personalization on top of it.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its ease of integration with any upfront platform or CMS solution. The solution also provides ease of access through APIs, making it flexible. Compared to its contemporary products, Adobe Commerce is easy to learn.

The solution’s performance could be improved.

I have been using Adobe Commerce for not more than one year.

Less than 50 users use the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution’s technical support a seven to eight out of ten.

Our organization chose Adobe Commerce because of competency, as we have certified people who have implemented the product across industries and clients. Other contemporary products like Salesforce and SAP are more expensive than Adobe Commerce. We chose Adobe Commerce because most of our clients are mid-sized companies or startups looking for a viable option.

I would recommend Adobe Commerce to users just starting up with e-commerce and trying to experiment. SAP and Salesforce are implementing accelerators, but we are still finding ways to get that through Adobe Commerce.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.