Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Amazon MQ Logo

Amazon MQ Reviews

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Get the Message Queue (MQ) Software Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ, IBM MQ, VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and more!
Amazon MQ is the #6 ranked solution in top Message Queue Software. PeerSpot users give Amazon MQ an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Amazon MQ is most commonly compared to IBM MQ: Amazon MQ vs IBM MQ. Amazon MQ is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 62% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 22% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
July 2025
Get the category report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured Amazon MQ reviews

Read more reviews

Amazon MQ mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Amazon MQ in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category stands at 3.7%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon MQ3.7%
IBM MQ26.9%
ActiveMQ26.2%
Other43.2%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Amazon MQ offers high availability, scalability, and robust security. Users benefit from its managed service feature, ensuring ease of use and simple implementation. Minimal effort is required to maintain operations. The platform supports collaboration by allowing centralized information and engaging discussions. Suitable for those with basic computer knowledge, Amazon MQ integrates into server architecture efficiently, handling messages without interrupting user transactions. Additionally, Power BI enhances reporting capabilities when paired with Amazon MQ.
  • "We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."
  • "Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."
  • "Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

Room for Improvement

Amazon MQ users express a desire for additional messaging queues like IBM MQ with simpler plugins. They prefer a single IP address instead of two for failover and seek enhanced monitoring, back-end security, and lower pricing. Community support needs refinement, particularly with distributed systems and integration. Improving message exchange and providing a templating engine for the message queue would be beneficial. Users advocate for the tool to be more affordable for end users.
  • "If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."
  • "In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."
  • "The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

Pricing

  • "As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."
  • "Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily utilize Amazon MQ as an integration layer between applications, configuring brokers, queues, and users. It supports consumer services that interact with queues for endpoint communication and visualizations. Widely adopted for website hosting, storage, notifications, and AI models, it facilitates integration across domains and insurance services. Companies employ Amazon MQ for client-specific solutions, ensuring streamlined messaging, managed services, and enhanced system processes.

Service and Support

Most technical assistance for Amazon MQ originates from the community and online resources like Stack Overflow. Documentation is excellent. Many issues arise from setup and permission errors. Real-time support is available and rated highly. Enterprises receive prompt assistance, sometimes within minutes, with dedicated account managers. AWS provides attentive support when required.

Deployment

Users rate Amazon MQ's initial setup as very easy, especially for technical individuals with cloud experience. Installation is quick, often taking seconds with tools like Terraform. Amazon MQ is accessible via a provided URL for message management. For deployment, two to five resources may be needed. Security checks and plugins are considerations for deployment, typically completed in hours. Online resources, such as YouTube, assist with any cloud-related inquiries, ensuring users can address deployment challenges effectively.

Scalability

Amazon MQ is praised for its automatic scalability, with users expressing satisfaction and rating it highly. It successfully supports various organizational needs without noticeable issues. While some find it perfectly fitting for enterprises and rate it highly, others suggest its scalability is not essential due to smaller message volumes. Users commonly assign a score around eight to ten, reflecting its effective operation across different environments and client sizes.

Stability

Amazon MQ is stable for many users, with few experiencing issues. Some rate stability as high as nine out of ten, while others rate it a seven. Users report no major problems using Amazon MQ alongside ActiveMQ. Despite its stability, challenges with community templating can occur when scaling.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Message Queue (MQ) Software Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise85
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
University
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Government
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Media Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Sports Company
2%
Retailer
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare Amazon MQ with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Amazon MQ

Amazon MQ customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

Related questions

  • 23
When evaluating Message Queue, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 60
What Message Queue (MQ) Software do you recommend? Why?
  • 52
What is the best MQ software out there?
  • 95
What is MQ software?
  • 13
Why is Message Queue (MQ) Software important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ Logo
IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ Logo
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ
Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ Logo
Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ
Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ Logo
Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ
EMQX vs Amazon MQ Logo
EMQX vs Amazon MQ
Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ Logo
Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ
See all alternatives
 
Amazon MQ Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod4.0My company, a software provider, designs client-specific solutions using Amazon MQ for website hosting and storage. I find Amazon MQ secure, but it could be more affordable for end users. We deploy it using Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Senior Solutions Architect at Think Power Solutions3.0We use Amazon MQ as a broker for our AI model, primarily for notifications and services. It excels in scalability, robustness, and security. However, a templating engine could enhance the message queue. We're considering RabbitMQ as an alternative.
AWS Solution Architect at bcaa4.0In our company, we use Amazon MQ for messaging in our insurance software. The solution is user-friendly, managed by AWS, and easily accessible. However, there's room for improvement in its backend and security aspects to enhance functionality.
Senior Software Engineer at MentorMate5.0In our use of Amazon MQ, we integrate managed matrices and messages into it. Its scalability is impressive. We have consumer services that interact with these queues for further processing and visualization, without needing any improvements or alternate solutions.
Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees5.0We use Amazon MQ for integrating systems across various domains, valuing its collaborative and centralized approach. However, community support needs improvement, especially in message exchange. We're considering Confluent Kafka for enhanced streaming capabilities.
IBM MQ Specialist / Administrator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
senior site reliability engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5Amazon MQ's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect, which simplifies implementation and requires minimal effort for business operations. However, its monitoring capabilities and pricing could be improved. We use it due to its simplicity.