Amazon RDS Reviews

Amazon RDS offers financial efficiency by eliminating the need for extensive infrastructure, allowing companies to pay per usage. Many note cost savings from reduced DBA salaries and infrastructure costs. Some experience complete returns on investment, while others see average results, with specific figures varying. Transitioning to Amazon RDS can reduce expenses compared to managing databases in-house or using EC2 VMs. However, cost concerns persist as AWS becomes pricey.

Enterprise buyers find Amazon RDS pricing to be flexible yet potentially expensive if not optimized. Users emphasize the importance of careful provisioning and utilizing options like Reserved Instances to manage costs. RDS supports BYOL and offers open-source database options to reduce expenses. While some users find it more affordable than competitors like SQL Server or Microsoft Azure, others point out high costs for additional services and unpredictable charges without proper monitoring. Overall, pricing varies based on usage and optimization strategies.

• "The cost is manageable because you can see the expense associated with each instance and utilize tools for tagging and cost control."
• "The platform pricing is on the higher side, but given its capabilities and ease of use, it remains competitive."
• "AWS is becoming pretty expensive because cheap or absolutely free services have become paid services. Amazon RDS is not an expensive product, but Amazon's ecosystem is becoming increasingly expensive."

Organizations primarily use Amazon RDS for hosting applications on the Amazon cloud that require a database. Developers, development teams, and cloud infrastructure teams migrate databases from on-premises to AWS, utilizing Amazon RDS for simplified database management, scalability, and security. It supports various database engines like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Oracle while automating aspects such as provisioning and patching. Users leverage it for transaction processing, data warehousing, and managing relational data services.

Amazon RDS customer service and support are considered good by many, with prompt responses and various support options. However, some express dissatisfaction due to additional costs for adequate support. While some users find the available online resources and documentation helpful for resolving issues, others highlight variability in response time and expertise based on service level agreements and location. Premium support generally receives higher praise compared to standard support.

Amazon RDS's initial setup is generally straightforward and quick, often taking only minutes, especially for teams familiar with its configuration. Users appreciate the clarity of its documentation, automation features, and ease of management. However, complexities arise with large databases, multi-account environments, or detailed security setups. Some users note the process requires careful attention to IAM, security groups, and infrastructure planning. Despite occasional challenges, many find the setup manageable without extensive technical expertise.

Amazon RDS is generally regarded for its robust scalability. Many organizations effectively manage growth with features designed for flexible capacity adjustments, although some note limitations in autoscaling options. It accommodates usage from small teams to thousands of users, making it suitable for diverse needs. Some users find it simpler to expand compared to on-premise alternatives, while others feel scaling options could be improved.

Users frequently report that Amazon RDS is stable. Many highlight its reliability with minimal issues like bugs or crashes. Backup and restore features aid in maintaining stability. Some users emphasize necessary configurations and team expertise to leverage stability effectively, while a few note experiences with minor downtime or specific stability variances between databases. Ratings for stability mostly range from eight to ten, reflecting high user satisfaction with its performance and uptime.