ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ArcSight Analytics | 2.0% |
| Exabeam | 8.6% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 6.3% |
| Other | 83.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ArcSight Analytics vs Exabeam | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ArcSight Analytics vs IBM Security QRadar | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ArcSight Analytics vs Cynet | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Security QRadar | 4.0 | 6.3% | 90% | 217 interviewsAdd to research |
| Varonis Platform | 4.2 | 4.7% | 94% | 18 interviewsAdd to research |
ArcSight Analytics was previously known as ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | No summary available |
| CEO at Kapstone Technological Services LLP | 4.5 | ArcSight Analytics provides deep network insight and threat analysis, offering valuable reports for understanding vulnerabilities and potential attacks. It is scalable and easily deployable, effectively helping to assess the likelihood of threats based on CVS scores. |
| Delivery Head at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | No summary available |
| Cyber Security Team Leader at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.0 | No summary available |
| Principle Architect at Tech Mahindra | 4.0 | I value ArcSight for its behavioral analytics and anomaly detection, noting good stability and scalability. However, its complex nature, requiring skilled users, and poor visualization are areas for improvement, although support is decent. |
| Cyber Security Consultant at raf | 3.0 | I use ArcSight for network monitoring, valuing its log monitoring. However, it's not user-friendly, lacks good third-party integration, and I wouldn't recommend it, preferring Splunk or QRadar. |
| Director at Techpace | 3.5 | I find its log correlation excellent for security events. However, reporting, dashboards, and the ecosystem need improvement. Customer service is lacking. It's expensive and moderately complex to set up, best for complex use cases. |
| Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | No summary available |
