Azure Web Application Firewall Reviews

Azure Web Application Firewall enabled cost savings compared to Fortinet, Check Point, or Palo Alto, which are more expensive and vulnerable to major exploits. It fulfilled security needs, making the platform preferable to customers. Users noted AI-based recommendations reduced time and expenses, enhancing the return on investment. When deploying applications for clients, they benefitted from better pricing, resulting in improved return on investment for most applications utilized.

Azure Web Application Firewall is considered reasonably priced by enterprises, often favorably compared to AWS and GCP. Pricing can vary based on architecture and usage, with most finding it controllable within Azure. The licensing is straightforward, though costs can rise with higher SKUs. Enterprises in regions like Brazil find the terms suitable. While some perceive the costs as high, many agree that the functionality provided justifies the expense, often around $2,000 per month.

• "The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month."
• "I give the pricing a nine out of ten."
• "Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."

Azure Web Application Firewall is used for securing web applications against external threats and internal connectivity, serving as a reverse proxy and for log analytics in workspaces. It provides protection against UPII, DDoS, phishing, spam, SQL injection, and layer 7 threats. Users employ it for web traffic filtering, cloud security, request analysis and blocking, and leveraging automation features. It integrates seamlessly with other security solutions, defending applications with customizable rules and endpoint security support.

Azure Web Application Firewall customer service receives mixed feedback. Microsoft technical support is often rated as good, offering knowledgeable and professional assistance. Some users appreciate support in native languages, while others find the response times decent. Satisfaction with support largely depends on service level agreements and payment tiers, with higher levels receiving better attention. Some users rate customer service lower, noting the need for premium plans for effective assistance. Premium package holders benefit from immediate responses from Microsoft's dedicated architects.

The setup of Azure Web Application Firewall is mostly described as straightforward and easy, with many users completing it within an hour or less. Users mentioned finding it intuitive and complemented by plentiful online resources and guides. Some required additional time, noting the need for familiarity with rules, DNS, and traffic factors. Occasionally, setups spanned days, with ongoing maintenance involving cybersecurity analysts. Azure's platforms, including the Web Application Firewall, benefit from comprehensive and easy-to-follow guides.

Azure Web Application Firewall is praised for its excellent scalability with many organizations noting the ability to increase usage as needed. It is adaptable to various subscription levels and workloads. Teams can efficiently scale up or down and manage users easily. Some configurations may require specific SKUs to enable all features. Users appreciate the flexibility in deployments and rate it highly, finding it well-suited for different scaling needs without significant limitations.

Azure Web Application Firewall is reported to have good stability. Users find it reliable with no significant technical challenges or glitches. Some minor issues in Brazil relate to phone service affecting cloud connections, but these are uncommon. In earlier years, delays in changes were noted, but they have been resolved. Minor latency issues occurred once in eighteen months but were quickly fixed. Azure WAF is considered extremely stable by users globally.