

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Azure Web Application Firewall compete in the cloud security category. Prisma Cloud has the upper hand with its comprehensive security features, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall is favored for its intuitive ease of use and integration within the Azure ecosystem.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers advanced cloud security features, including Cloud Security Posture Management, vulnerability monitoring across different cloud platforms, and CI/CD pipeline scanning. Azure Web Application Firewall is noted for its ease of configuration, efficient protection against generic threats, and seamless Azure service integration.
Room for Improvement: Prisma Cloud requires improved support for additional file formats like PDFs for reporting, better automation integration, and is not very user-friendly in complex environments. Azure Web Application Firewall could enhance its documentation, offer pricing models more suitable for smaller enterprises, and expand its knowledge base for beginners.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma Cloud supports deployment across public, private, and hybrid environments, although its customer support experiences vary, with reports of slow responses. Azure Web Application Firewall is easily deployable within Azure, with customer support generally seen as responsive.
Pricing and ROI: Prisma Cloud is considered a costlier option but provides high ROI due to its robust security measures and feature integration. Azure Web Application Firewall is competitively priced, especially under Microsoft enterprise agreements, making it economically attractive for organizations heavily invested in Azure.
Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.
AI-based recommendations save on time and money.
It eliminates the need for additional hardware, making it a financially and technically sound investment.
Reputation and data security are the two most important things to a financial institution.
We may have prevented a security breach with remediation of the findings.
They are good at troubleshooting and configuring things.
I am very satisfied with the response from Microsoft dedicated architects if it happens that I have to call for their support.
I reached out to their support, and they helped me resolve the issue effectively.
They can respond with technical documentation or pass on the case to the next level because it requires the development of a new feature or changing a feature due to a bug.
Anywhere we raise a tech case, they revert back within an hour.
I would rate them a nine out of ten because whenever there are issues, they are able to resolve them within the timelines and SLAs.
Some Azure applications, like the web application firewall, require a certain level of SKU for hosting setup.
For our company, Azure Web Application Firewall works effectively for scalability.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We haven't had any issues scaling the solution.
There aren't any limits to Prisma Cloud's scalability.
Very rarely do I see any latency issues.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
Most of the time, when the client requires data, it is not available.
The cloud environment is dynamic, so the tool must be dynamic.
Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.
The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced.
Prisma Cloud is an excellent tool.
We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts.
Even though documentation was available, it took a while for a new person to understand what integration meant, what will be achieved after the integration, or how the integration needed to be done on the Azure or AWS side.
It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.
I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.
The cost was not on the higher side.
If you are using a single tool like Prisma Cloud, with a single license, you can monitor all environments, such as Google Cloud, Azure, AWS, and Oracle Cloud.
It is not a cheap product.
With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.
It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.
It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot.
There is a wide range of integrations, and the compatibility with various cloud providers is very useful.
It provides a single pane of glass.
If I want to check how many of my S3s have encryption, I can write a Lambda function in Prisma Cloud and get that report.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 1.7% |
| Azure Web Application Firewall | 3.1% |
| Other | 95.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.
Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.
What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?
What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?
Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.