We are using BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe for all the security, such as logins, minimum privileges, Safe, and VPN.
BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is a secure vault that manages and protects sensitive credentials across your software development processes, enhancing security and reducing risks.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe | 1.6% |
| Azure Key Vault | 15.3% |
| AWS Secrets Manager | 14.3% |
| Other | 68.8% |
Specialized in facilitating DevOps environments, BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe integrates seamlessly with existing workflows to safeguard credentials and access, thereby optimizing security without impeding performance. It addresses the growing need for secure management of secrets and passwords, ensuring compliance and reducing vulnerabilities.
What are the key features?In the financial services industry, implementation of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe involves integrating with existing software deployment pipelines to protect transactional data. This ensures high compliance standards are met. In the healthcare sector, it helps secure patient information while aligning with strict data protection regulations, ensuring patient confidentiality during development cycles.
Starbucks, Ebay, CSC, RBC, Williams-Sonoma, Carbonite
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Contractor at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I rate BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe an 8/10. It's great for security, with good ease of use and API. However, I found AD Bridge stability issues, slow support, and a complex initial setup. Plan well. |
| Cybersecurity Architect at DataAssure | 3.5 | As a cybersecurity architect, I rate this sophisticated and mature product 7/10. It’s the best tool, with easy setup and improved stability, although some bugs persist. |
| General Manager at a tech services company with 1-10 employees | 3.5 | I use BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe to manage user accounts. It's user-friendly with good stability. However, scalability needs improvement, and support is slow. I rate it 7/10 and recommend a POC. |
| Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I find DevOps Secrets Safe highly customizable, easy to set up, and scalable. However, the extensive customization can lead to errors, which BeyondTrust should reduce. I recommend it, rating it 8/10, but check your specific requirements. |
We are using BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe for all the security, such as logins, minimum privileges, Safe, and VPN.
BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe has made companies a lot safer.
The most valuable features of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe are the ease of use and the API is very nice. Additionally, the interface is very good between AD and Unix.
I have been using BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe for approximately three years.
BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe stability in the AD Bridge has been not good, we have had many issues. I recently received a new version a few weeks ago and it looks like they solved most of the problems. Some of the issues we had, lasted a very long time until they found a solution.
I have found BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe scalable.
We have a few thousand users using this solution.
We had some issues with the solution and once we contacted support they eventually solved the problem. They could improve their response time.
We were using Pseudo and only Unix previously. For Microsoft Windows systems we used CyberArk. We switched to BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe because we felt it would provide a better overall solution.
The installation of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe could be made easier sometimes it is difficult. It can take a long time to configure properly.
The full deployment took a long time. For example, the AD Bridge took us at least eight months to finish.
BeyondTrust helped us to scan all the assets that we have and we onboarded all the assets and we had to reeducate all the people on how to use them. It was quite a long process.
We did the implementation in-house but for our South Africa implementation, we used the help from BeyondTrust.
We had a five-person Unix team maintaining BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe. However, they were not maintaining on BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe, they were maintaining the operating system, and other things.
I am not sure if companies have received a return on investment. However, the companies are enjoying the solution and it has kept them safe.
My advice to those wanting to implement BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is for them to plan it very well before making a decision. If they are changing from another solution to BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe or doing a fresh without any history, planning is important. They should use BeyondTrust people to help them install it and make it work.
I rate BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe an eight out of ten.

We are resellers of this product and I'm a cybersecurity architect.
They've done a great job implementing all possible features. It's the best tool there is and no competitors come close to the level of sophistication and maturity of the product. It has all the functionalities we need.
There are still some bugs in the solution but a lot less than there used to be. Unfortunately, CyberArk and BeyondTrust are in fierce competition. Many customers have already adopted CyberArk, but they need a proven remote access solution and are likely to go with BeyondTrust. Both solutions can be used, it's just more work for IT to manage them. CyberArk is still leading the market share globally, and BeyondTrust is always classified second, followed by Delinea or Thycotic.
I've been using this solution for eight years.
The solution is relatively stable, but not all bugs have been fixed.
The setup is quite easy and maintenance requires one person to develop workflow. When it's set up via the reseller, it runs by itself and doesn't require many resources.
Earlier versions had a lot of problems and bugs, but they've ironed out most of them, and the product has become more stable and more mature. When we first started working with them there were a lot of problems.
I rate this solution seven out of 10.
We use BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe to manage all the user accounts.
The local administrator can manage all the user's logins in one, simple, straight-away account access. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly.
I have been using BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe for approximately three years.
The stability of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is good.
The scalability of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe could improve.
I would rate the scalability of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe a seven out of ten.
We have one client using the solution.
The support for the solution is not very good, they could improve by being quicker.
I have used previously Delinea. I would recommend Delinea and BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe to others.
The installation of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is at a moderate level of difficulty.
We have one engineer that does the implementation and support of the solution.
There is an annual license required to use BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe.
I would recommend that before they use the solution they do a POC.
I rate BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe a seven out of ten.
DevOps Secrets Safe allows you to customize a lot of rules.
You need to improvise many of the customized rules, which can lead to some errors. BeyondTrust should reduce the error rate.
I think since last one and a half years.
Secrets Safe is highly scalable without interruptions to the current infrastructure.
Implementation is easy, and Secrets Safe comes with some predefined templates.
I rate BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe eight out of 10. If you are thinking about implementing this solution, I suggest looking at the requirements for your use cases for application passwords and then going ahead with this product.