Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Reviews

Vendor: Cybereason
3.9 out of 5

What is Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Featured Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category stands at 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response1.0%
CrowdStrike Falcon14.1%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10.3%
Other74.6%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

PeerResearch reports based on Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEndpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Aug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs CrowdStrike FalconAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs SentinelOne Singularity CompleteAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Microsoft Defender for EndpointAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CrowdStrike Falcon4.314.1%96%132 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint4.110.3%94%198 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business174
Midsize Enterprise99
Large Enterprise290
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
 
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Security Delivery Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees4.0We deploy Cybereason EDR across numerous endpoints globally for improved threat detection and protection. The platform's clarity and ease of use stand out, though I wish for better grouping functionalities and more flexible whitelisting options.
Head of Research Development and Innovation at CSIR3.0No summary available
Operational Technical Security at Metro Bank4.5<p>We use Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response for scanning and detecting unusual processes and malicious files. Its intuitive, GUI-based threat-hunting feature is valuable, but improvements in stability and connectivity are needed. Overall, it provides a good return on investment.</p>
Information Security Officer at PTCI4.0No summary available
Information Security Analyst at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees4.5No summary available
Senior Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0No summary available
Director of Learning and Development at ACA - Ateliers de conversation anglaise5.0No summary available
Information Security Manager at Cabot Financial (Marlin) Limited3.0<p>I found Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response to have a user-friendly interface compared to other products. However, we faced issues with tuning clients, experiencing high CPU utilization. Initially, the ROI was unstable but improved after setup adjustments.</p>