Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ExtremeControl Logo

ExtremeControl Reviews

Vendor: Extreme Networks
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is ExtremeControl?

ExtremeControl lets you manage secure and automated access for both, BYOD and IoT devices from one convenient dashboard. It makes it easy to roll out granular policies across your wired and wireless networks to meet industry and company compliance obligations. Identity based network access control keeps unauthorized people and devices from accessing your network.
Get the Network Access Control (NAC) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeControl, Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Aruba ClearPass and more!
ExtremeControl is the #11 ranked solution in top Network Access Control (NAC) solutions. PeerSpot users give ExtremeControl an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. ExtremeControl is most commonly compared to Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE): ExtremeControl vs Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE). ExtremeControl is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
July 2025
Get the category report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured ExtremeControl reviews

Read more reviews

ExtremeControl mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of ExtremeControl in the Network Access Control (NAC) category stands at 1.8%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ExtremeControl1.8%
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)24.9%
Aruba ClearPass24.3%
Other49.0%
Network Access Control (NAC)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

ExtremeControl provides visibility into end-user activities and traffic types. It offers reliability, seamless integration with third-party devices, and user databases like Microsoft Active Directory. Integrating with ExtremeConnect enhances security and control, supporting flexible and customizable policies. Users find it easy to use, customize, and maintain, with comprehensive documentation for integration. ExtremeControl enables deep analysis of user issues and network applications, ensuring efficient troubleshooting and enhancing overall network management and automation.
  • "On a scale of 1-10, I rate ExtremeControl a 10."
  • "Overall, I would rate ExtremeControl nine out of ten."
  • "It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations."

Room for Improvement

ExtremeControl needs enhancements for comprehensive user control across networks and more information on traffic. Users find the on-premises controller lacking, preferring the cloud for analytics. Improving integration with third-party systems is desired, especially for wired networks. There is a need for certificate management and clarification on the system's optimal usage. UZTNA should be enhanced with NAC features similar to ExtremeControl for better comparative performance. Performance issues may arise when handling numerous devices.
  • "In terms of cost, I believe ExtremeControl is reasonably priced for big enterprises, but for smaller ones, they need to consider that the price for less than 1,000 users is important, as this is the minimum number of users required for a license. Below this number, we are not competitive with other vendors."
  • "I would rate their technical support five out of ten. They have strict upgrade policies."
  • "The initial setup was not easy. It requires an experienced person to deploy ExtremeControl, and deployment can take from days to weeks depending on the complexity of the network."

ROI

ExtremeControl shows mixed returns. Some users observe low ROI, rating it four out of ten, while others experience positive returns, especially with improved Wi-Fi connectivity that proves vital for business operations. However, many find it challenging to quantify due to its primary security use. Despite investments, measuring ROI remains difficult for some, making a direct assessment elusive.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers find ExtremeControl's pricing competitive, especially against Cisco ISE. It offers both one-time and annual licensing options, providing flexibility. While considered expensive by some, it's viewed as reasonably priced for large enterprises, with minimum user requirements potentially less favorable for smaller businesses. The annual licensing is notable, with Cloud IQ specifically requiring annual renewals. ExtremeControl's pricing is often deemed among the best compared to other market options, particularly for larger organizations.
  • "ExtremeControl can be expensive compared to other options in the market."

Popular Use Cases

ExtremeControl is primarily used for network management, authentication, and security across various entities. It controls access points, firewalls, and switches, enabling user authentication through integration with systems like Active Directory. It supports 70,000 users at Egypt's largest university and is used for projects with government entities. It helps manage device authentication and network automation, with compatibility across third-party products such as Cisco and Aruba, enhancing IT ecosystems with customizable integrations.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for ExtremeControl receive mixed feedback. Some users express satisfaction, noting efficient problem-solving without technical issues, while others face challenges with strict upgrade requirements. Support for cloud services is considered satisfactory, but on-premises assistance lacks adequacy. Ratings vary, with some users giving high praise for effective coping with issues, while others assign moderate scores due to the perceived need for frequent upgrades to obtain support.

Deployment

ExtremeControl's initial setup is generally easy, taking from minutes to days based on complexity. Some users find it straightforward, while others, especially with complex environments, note it can take longer and may need an experienced person. Deployment may require multiple steps, but users appreciate compatibility with various vendors. Larger teams are sometimes involved, especially in larger projects, requiring ongoing maintenance and support, with some setups taking up to a year before full production readiness.

Scalability

Several users find ExtremeControl highly scalable, with some giving it top ratings for scalability in larger environments, up to 500 devices. Others, however, express concerns about its effectiveness in both cloud and on-premises settings, noting lower satisfaction. Ratings vary widely, with some viewing it as extremely scalable, while others see limitations. This variance suggests that user experiences differ greatly depending on their specific needs and environments.

Stability

ExtremeControl exhibits high stability according to feedback. Many assign it ratings between eight and nine out of ten. Despite not deploying the latest version, several instances have shown consistent performance. Some project managers, not directly using it, also confirm its stability due to lack of issues reported. Feedback consistently highlights stable performance.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Network Access Control (NAC) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise57
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
12%
Government
11%
Educational Organization
9%
Retailer
6%
University
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Construction Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Sports Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%

Compare ExtremeControl with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about ExtremeControl

ExtremeControl was previously known as Extreme Access Control, Enterasys NAC.

ExtremeControl customers

Street Crane, Robert Bosch, Molex Chengdu, Weir Valves & Controls UK, Renault, AESSEAL, Ducati, Alexander Dennis, UK Ministry of Defence, Manz

Related questions

  • 38
PRICING FOR FORESCOUT CT10K APPLIANCE
  • 15
When evaluating Network Access Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 122
Which is the best choice of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
  • 36
What is your recommended Network Access Control (NAC) solution for an enterprise?
  • 121
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs Fortinet FortiNAC: which solution is better and why?
  • 33
What network access control software do you recommend?
  • 31
Why is NAC (network access control) important?
  • 95
Why is Network Access Control (NAC) important for companies?
  • 12
Has anyone ever heard of secureaccess.com?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Network Access Control (NAC)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeControl Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeControl
Aruba ClearPass vs ExtremeControl Logo
Aruba ClearPass vs ExtremeControl
Fortinet FortiNAC vs ExtremeControl Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC vs ExtremeControl
Forescout Platform vs ExtremeControl Logo
Forescout Platform vs ExtremeControl
Sophos Network Access Control vs ExtremeControl Logo
Sophos Network Access Control vs ExtremeControl
See all alternatives
 
ExtremeControl Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System Engineer at Poczta FM5.0I use ExtremeControl for user authentication and integrating third-party solutions like Cisco and Microsoft Active Directory. It offers flexible policies and easy customization, though it lacks certificate management. We don't measure ROI, but it's mostly used for security.
Manager, Service Delivery & Support at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.5I use ExtremeControl for projects with government entities to create policies for Active Directory access. Its deep insights into user applications are valuable. However, it lacks features for wired networks with third-party switching, emphasizing wireless connectivity.
Engineer at NewLogics4.5I have installed ExtremeControl for clients who use it for BYOD, device authentication, network security, and automation. Integrating it with ExtremeConnect enhances security and visibility. Some clients prefer on-premise solutions over cloud analytics for better performance with numerous devices.
IT specialist at FERCAM SpA2.5ExtremeControl's most valuable feature is its reliability, consistently performing well without frequent maintenance. While it shows a positive ROI, the solution works best with all components purchased together, and we need to evaluate antennas' longevity for true ROI.
Project Manager at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees4.0No summary available
Management Board Member and Network Engineer at NewLogics4.5I find ExtremeControl's on-premises controller lacking, as it misses many features and has an unprofessional interface compared to its cloud counterpart. The development is insufficient, resulting in a low ROI, which I rate four out of ten.
Senior Manager, Information Technology at a university with 201-500 employees4.0No summary available
Presales Engineer at soulco4.0No summary available