Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Logo

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Reviews

Vendor: Forcepoint
3.8 out of 5

What is Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP?

Featured Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP reviews

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category stands at 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP0.5%
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention13.0%
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention9.1%
Other77.4%
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Compare Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP with alternative products

Learn more about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP

Related questions

 
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Solution Specialist at South Asian Technologies4.5In our banking environment, Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP effectively meets compliance needs such as PCI and CBLS regulations. Although it's costly, its comprehensive DLP capabilities, including AI features, justify the investment. Improvements are needed in SaaS malware protection.
CISO at V Guard Industries Ltd3.5We use Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for data loss prevention, valuing its monitoring features. However, clarity for end users and region-specific configuration improvements are needed. We chose Forcepoint over Symantec for its superior data classification and DLP features.
Director at Specsia3.5We utilize Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for monitoring, classification, and auto-discovery, but we find its analytical tools lacking in customization. Its flexibility in policy enforcement and network coverage is beneficial, yet automation in classification could improve.