Google App Engine Reviews

Google App Engine provides efficient operational benefits, allowing users to spin up new versions effortlessly and avoid server maintenance. Users have reported cost savings, with some experiencing a reduction in monthly expenses from $700-$800 to $120 when switching from VM to Google App Engine. Others noted significant cost savings through optimal resource allocation and consultations with customer engineers. Although some haven't measured financial improvements, those familiar with its use experienced substantial benefits.

Google App Engine users found its pricing competitive, especially at low usage tiers, with a pay-as-you-go model. Pricing can become higher with increased usage or unspecified features, potentially impacting budgets. Users noted price fluctuations due to currency instability and spike risks from mismanagement. Expenses are billed based on memory and CPUs. While generally perceived as affordable, some believe further cost reductions could be beneficial. The pricing structure varies significantly depending on the specific use case and required features.

• "If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."
• "We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
• "I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

Google App Engine is employed for deploying web applications, migrating from on-premises to cloud, and server-side rendering. It supports integration with Google services like Cloud Pub/Sub and enables seamless authentication. Businesses use it for scalable backend deployments, scripting tasks, and communication applications. Companies find it cost-effective for SaaS applications, leveraging autoscaling and monitoring capabilities. Users consistently choose Google App Engine for flexibility, efficiency, and the ability to develop without maintaining infrastructure.

Google App Engine support is varied. Technical support ratings fluctuate with some finding it responsive, especially at enterprise level or with platinum packages, while others encounter slow or inefficient service. Documentation and forums often compensate for direct support needs. Users appreciate quick resolutions when possible, though instance-specific support can be lacking. For platinum, immediate engagement is noted, but standard packages experience slower responses. Services from third-parties or as resellers receive mixed reactions regarding responsiveness.

Google App Engine's initial setup is perceived as straightforward, with many finding it easy due to clear documentation and familiar architecture. For some, it requires understanding of configuration files and technical skills, especially for non-web applications. The setup duration varies, with some completing it in minutes, while others take longer depending on complexity. Developers appreciate features like YAML files, CI/CD pipelines, and the ability to handle traffic efficiently compared to other platforms.

Google App Engine is considered highly scalable, accommodating varied user needs. It automatically manages traffic, integrating easily with applications. Usage varies, with some users reporting fine scalability and others experiencing minor challenges with intensive requests. Automatic, basic, and manual scaling options are available, supporting users as they expand storage or CPU usage. Third-party integration and microservices offer scalable solutions, but improvements in error handling and flexible instance deployments are noted by some users.

Google App Engine is generally stable, with few disruptions reported in three years of usage. Users find it reliable, rating stability high. While installation and maintenance require minimal effort, some users noted slowness with large scripts, though it's improved. Occasional issues, such as network disruptions, are rare and resolved quickly. Instances of minor bugs were addressed promptly, resulting in positive experiences despite some delays. Users appreciate the platform's overall reliability and stability.