Google App Engine vs IBM Public Cloud comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #18 with an average rating of 6.5. Google holds a 2.4% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Google App Engine

Read 36 Google App Engine reviews

1,775 Views
1,615 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Public Cloud

Read 18 IBM Public Cloud reviews

2,248 Views
1,933 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

IBM Public Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and IBM Public Cloud compete in cloud computing. Google App Engine holds an edge with its ease of use and pricing flexibility, while IBM Public Cloud is preferred for businesses prioritizing advanced features and customization.

Features: Google App Engine offers integrated developer tools, auto-scaling, and a focus on simple application management. IBM Public Cloud shines with robust AI capabilities, strong security features, and hybrid cloud solutions.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine could enhance its service flexibility and expand its database options. Integration with more third-party services and improving advanced configuration options would also be beneficial. IBM Public Cloud might focus on simplifying its user interface, reducing complexity in deployment scenarios, and enhancing cost transparency for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google App Engine provides a simple deployment experience with an intuitive console, making it user-friendly. IBM Public Cloud supports enterprises with thorough customer service options, including dedicated support and extensive resources, catering to those needing comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine attracts startups and small businesses with its usage-based billing, offering potential for quick ROI. IBM Public Cloud, while more costly initially, promises high returns with its powerful features, catering to businesses looking for long-term value and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. IBM Public Cloud Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. IBM Public Cloud

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Public Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IoT Platforms (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Public Cloud is 3.2%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google App Engine	2.4%
IBM Public Cloud	3.2%
Other	94.4%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Kadyan

Senior Engineer at Brillio

Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities

The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Read full review

Premnath Jaganathan

Product Manager at Uop Ipl

Affordability and security improve our cloud experience while learning new systems

I'm not working with any AI features in IBM Public Cloud, but they are in the process of building it.I am very satisfied with the security that IBM Public Cloud provides. I would rate IBM Public Cloud eight out of ten, where one is worst and ten is the best.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google App Engine's most valuable feature is self-management. You do not have to manage the infrastructure underneath where all the functions are happening, such as load balancing deployment and version management, they are managed by the system itself."

"It is simple to use. It is much simpler than AWS. It is also very powerful."

"Its ability to integrate with most devices helps users who have different or old devices."

"What I find most beneficial about Google App Engine is that we do not need to manage it since it's a fully managed serverless platform, allowing us to spend more time on development rather than managing and maintaining configurations."

"The initial setup is okay. It's not too complex. Deployment took about one day."

"Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications."

"The seamless integration of Google App Engine with other Google Cloud services has enhanced my application capabilities by allowing us to trigger Cloud Jobs from App Engine and some cloud functions, as handling messages through Pub/Sub."

"The solution is serverless, so we don't have to operate it."

More Google App Engine pros

"One of the features that I really like about IBM Cloud is the flexibility where you can order your own hardware."

"An advantage of IBM Public Cloud is the bare metal server. We can take the bare metal server. It's not shared with anyone. We can deploy our applications without sharing them with anyone. That is an advantage of IBM Public Cloud."

"I've found the stability to be excellent. The performance is good."

"The initial setup was very easy. It's quite straightforward. Deployment took about fifteen minutes. Everything is well organized."

"The price of IBM Cloud is most valuable for us. The service is personable and gives us a good rapport. I can't say it's the best, but it was enough for our needs."

"The beauty of cloud service providers, especially public cloud service providers, is that they are scalable every time when you need them because their payment model is pay-as-you-go."

"There is no installation for this product because it is a cloud product."

"It provides robust analytics and management tools to give customers complete visibility into their environment and infrastructure."

More IBM Public Cloud pros

Cons

"Some clients don't use it because Google is very unstable with their products. Google has terminated many promising products in the past, and some clients have stated, 'This is from Google, we don't trust it because Google can change their mind any day.'"

"The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages."

"There is limited customization because the sandbox environment restricts it."

"The interface and IDE, where I write code, could be improved. Unlike other IDEs like Visual Studio, it lacks easy access to available functions."

"I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five."

"The areas of Google App Engine I would to see improved or enhanced in the future include expanding inbuilt support for more programming languages than the current limited options such as Python, Go, and Node, ideally adding support for languages such as Java."

"The main drawback with Google App Engine's standard environment was its restrictions. We could not work with file systems, run shell scripts from the environment, or use WebSockets."

"There are two versions of Google App Engine: flexible and standard versions. I think they can improve by having only one version."

More Google App Engine cons

"Maybe performance enhancers and reports could be better improved. If they do so, it would be better. Of all the drawbacks I saw, this would be the biggest enhancement."

"While they have about 99% of what we need, the only exception, perhaps, was the push notification feature that was discontinued. They delayed the replacement product."

"The initial setup and the pricing are areas that need improvement."

"I would like to see a more user-friendly deployment process in the next release of this solution."

"The solution needs to be more autonomous. It should let the DL go to allow for more jobs on the cloud. It could have a better interface as well."

"The product should offer more computing, similar to Amazon."

"They do not have a very good virtual network implemented, and the VPC is the most important feature that needs to be improved."

"It could be more secure."

More IBM Public Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"In order to be competitive, you have to commit to a contract for at least one year, but you pay a fixed monthly fee."

"It pretty much has a standard price. There is no hidden price with IBM Public Cloud."

"The price of IBM Cloud is very cheap compared to competitors AWS and Azure."

"Pricing is not as fair as Amazon or Azure."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"IBM has a lesser price compared to other cloud service providers like Azure and AWS."

"We are using the trial version of this solution, so we have not paid anything."

"The licensing fees are straightforward and predictable."

More IBM Public Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

University

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

University

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google App Engine?

The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

See all answers

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Public Cloud?

The prices are relatively lower compared to others. It is a good option for medium-sized businesses. However, businesses should also consider other vendors to ensure they meet their specific securi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Public Cloud?

The connectivity and speed of IBM Public Cloud are much lower compared to the competition.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 17% of the time

Heroku vs Google App Engine

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google App Engine

Compared 3% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Amazon AWS vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Google Cloud vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Mendix vs IBM Public Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Public Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine

January 2026

Download Google App Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Public Cloud

January 2026

Download IBM Public Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Bluemix

Overview

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Google

IBM Cloud is a full-stack cloud platform that spans public, private and hybrid environments. Build with a robust suite of advanced data and AI tools, and draw on deep industry expertise to help you on your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Uvionics Tech, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Alpha Modus, Inventive, Web Business Consulting, FindBrok, SilverHook Powerboats, United Way of Allegheny County

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. IBM Public Cloud

February 2026

Free Report: Google App Engine vs. IBM Public Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. IBM Public Cloud and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google App Engine vs. IBM Public Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.