Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Security Verify Access Logo

IBM Security Verify Access Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is IBM Security Verify Access?

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

Get the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and more!
IBM Security Verify Access is the #13 ranked solution in top Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions, #14 ranked solution in top Identity and Access Management as a Service providers, #14 ranked solution in top Access Management solutions, and #21 ranked solution in top Identity Management (IM) solutions. PeerSpot users give IBM Security Verify Access an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. IBM Security Verify Access is most commonly compared to Microsoft Entra ID: IBM Security Verify Access vs Microsoft Entra ID. IBM Security Verify Access is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 69% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 22% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
September 2025
Get the category report
Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Featured IBM Security Verify Access reviews

Read more reviews

IBM Security Verify Access mindshare

Product category:
Identity and Access Management as a S...
As of October 2025, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category stands at 2.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Security Verify Access2.4%
Microsoft Entra ID23.3%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud13.0%
Other61.3%
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Users note that IBM Security Verify Access excels in multifactor authentication, access control, and single sign-on features. They find it highly customizable and appreciate the seamless integration with various systems. Its flexibility and adaptability are frequently highlighted, along with strong support for complex environments. Advanced security protocols and ease of deployment are also praised. Users also compliment its robust policy management capabilities and real-time monitoring.
  • "IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."
  • "IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."
  • "The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

Room for Improvement

IBM Security Verify Access requires improvements in usability to streamline operations for administrators, documentation for better clarity, and support processes to enhance customer experience. Configuration complexity and integration challenges with third-party applications limit its functionality. Performance issues and the need for more comprehensive reporting tools are also noted. Automated deployment and updates need enhancement for efficiency.
  • "IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."
  • "IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."
  • "The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

ROI

Users found IBM Security Verify Access enhanced security measures, reduced workload for IT staff, and provided a faster return on investment compared to other alternatives. Implementation led to notable savings by automating authentication processes and reducing potential breaches. Companies experienced significant improvements in efficiency and productivity, which translated into cost savings and better resource allocation.

Pricing

IBM Security Verify Access offers flexible pricing based on usage and deployment options. Many users appreciate its cost-effectiveness for large enterprises, along with volume-based discounts. Its pricing model accommodates both cloud-based and on-premises implementations, providing scalability and tailored solutions.
  • "The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."
  • "The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

Popular Use Cases

IBM Security Verify Access is primarily employed for secure access management and identity federation. Users utilize it to integrate with existing systems for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and to enhance security protocols. It assists in managing user identities and access privileges efficiently and is noted for its scalability in large enterprises.

Service and Support

IBM Security Verify Access receives positive feedback for its responsive and knowledgeable customer service. Users appreciate quick resolution times and professional support staff. Many highlight the efficiency of the assistance provided and mention that the support team is well-informed about the product's features and troubleshooting methods. Users feel confident using IBM Security Verify Access due to the reliable support system in place.

Deployment

Users find IBM Security Verify Access's initial setup manageable with proper documentation. They appreciate its clear instructions and support but note that it could be complex for those with limited technical expertise. The setup process is straightforward for experienced professionals, and they value the well-structured installation guides. Some mention it requires careful planning to align with specific requirements. Users also highlight the importance of following the provided guidelines to avoid potential obstacles.

Scalability

Users find IBM Security Verify Access highly scalable, suitable for large enterprises, and easy to integrate with existing systems. Its performance remains consistent even with increased load, while maintaining robust security features. Installation may require technical expertise but provides excellent support and documentation. Interface is intuitive, allowing for quick deployment. It efficiently handles multiple users and applications, making it a reliable choice for growing demands and complex environments.

Stability

IBM Security Verify Access provides robust stability. Users frequently express satisfaction with its performance, highlighting its reliability in diverse environments. It handles high loads efficiently and integrates well with existing systems. Technical support is responsive, which enhances user confidence. Periodic updates and patches maintain its dependability. Users appreciate its consistent uptime and minimal disruptions, making it a trusted choice for secure access management.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise40
Large Enterprise179
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Insurance Company
13%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Retailer
5%
Educational Organization
3%
University
3%
Construction Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%

Compare IBM Security Verify Access with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about IBM Security Verify Access

IBM Security Verify Access was previously known as IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM.

IBM Security Verify Access customers

POST Luxembourg

Related questions

  • 26
Looking for an Identity and Access Management product for an energy and utility organization
  • 29
Is SSO safe?
  • 64
Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
  • 44
What are your best practices for Identity and Access Management (IAM) in the Cloud?
  • 20
Why is identity and access management (IAM) so important in preventing data breaches?
  • 14
What access management tools would you recommend to help with GDPR compliance?
  • 19
How to convince a client that Identity and Access Management (IdAM) is essential for risk elimination?
  • 35
How is Zero Trust different from the Least Privileged model?
  • 21
What are the differences between LDAP and Active Directory?
  • 114
Which IDaaS solution do you prefer and why?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Identity Management (IM)
Access Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access
Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs IBM Security Verify Access
Cisco Duo vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Cisco Duo vs IBM Security Verify Access
Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access
Auth0 vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Auth0 vs IBM Security Verify Access
ForgeRock vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
ForgeRock vs IBM Security Verify Access
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access
OneLogin by One Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
OneLogin by One Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access
Microsoft Active Directory vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs IBM Security Verify Access
Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Security Verify Access
Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs IBM Security Verify Access
Red Hat Single Sign On vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Red Hat Single Sign On vs IBM Security Verify Access
Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access
See all alternatives
 
IBM Security Verify Access Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited4.0I use IBM BPM and Security Verify Access for secure process automation, while Azure DevOps supports CI/CD and source control. The tools are reliable, though installation complexity and limited integration are challenges we carefully manage with expert support.
Information Technology Security Specialist at infoark4.0I found IBM Security Verify Access to be a strong identity and access management solution, excelling in multi-factor authentication with various methods like tokens and one-time passwords. However, the user interface could be more intuitive, and automation would be beneficial.
Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0No summary available
Assitant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available
CEO, Founder at Finema4.0No summary available
Senior Network Engineer at IIS3.5No summary available
Manager in Digital Identity at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available