Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
No Magic MagicDraw Logo

No Magic MagicDraw Reviews

4.2 out of 5

What is No Magic MagicDraw?

Featured No Magic MagicDraw reviews

No Magic MagicDraw mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw in the Business Process Design category stands at 2.7%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
No Magic MagicDraw2.7%
Visio11.3%
Bizagi10.3%
Other75.7%
Business Process Design

PeerResearch reports based on No Magic MagicDraw reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBusiness Process DesignJan 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 27, 2026Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs CamundaJan 27, 2026Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs VisioJan 27, 2026Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs BizagiJan 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.19.3%89%78 interviewsAdd to research
Bizagi4.210.3%92%84 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business65
Midsize Enterprise56
Large Enterprise308
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
24%
Government
11%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
University
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Retailer
2%
Non Profit
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Media Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare No Magic MagicDraw with alternative products

Learn more about No Magic MagicDraw

No Magic MagicDraw customers

Related questions

 
No Magic MagicDraw Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.0I've used No Magic MagicDraw for 25 years due to its ease of use, strong collaboration tools, and reliable support, though I wish the simulation toolkit was included by default to avoid licensing complications.
Systems Engineer at Marinha do Brasil (Oficial)4.5I used No Magic MagicDraw for modeling operations with ships and systems. Its valuable features include integration with tools like MATLAB. I found it more user-friendly and with better documentation compared to IBM Rational Rhapsody and Capella.
Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5We are piloting a model-based engineering process using MagicDraw, valuing its excellent support and user-friendly service. However, the recommendation feature could improve as we occasionally struggle to find features and require assistance.
Chief Refrigeration Product Development Division at Indurama4.5I used MagicDraw for structured refrigeration systems and appreciated its traceability feature, which provides a comprehensive view of project impacts. However, the outdated user interface, integration issues, and difficulty in finding skilled users were challenging.
SCM Build/Release Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available
Systems Engineer at Marinha do Brasil (Oficial)4.5I use No Magic MagicDraw for modeling systems and find it user-friendly with extensive online documentation. However, it's quite expensive and a student trial version would be beneficial. No other solutions were considered and no cloud providers were mentioned.
Director at a engineering company with 11-50 employees4.0I use No Magic MagicDraw for system architecture and simulation, particularly valuing its simulation capabilities and interface. While the solution is effective, its pricing could be more competitive. I also use PTC Integrity and Eac for different purposes.
Director, Strategy and Consulting at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5No summary available