No Magic MagicDraw vs WorkflowGen comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Dassault Systèmes and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Dassault Systèmes is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while WorkflowGen is ranked #25. Dassault Systèmes holds a 2.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to WorkflowGen’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dassault Systèmes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

3,076 Views
2,861 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

4,678 Views
936 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

No Magic MagicDraw and WorkflowGen compete in software development and business process management. WorkflowGen seems to hold an advantage in process automation and ROI due to its superior integration and automation features.

Features: MagicDraw provides advanced UML modeling, SysML support, and efficient diagram creation tools, which are essential for detailed design tasks. It stands out for its capability in creating complex models. WorkflowGen focuses on business process management with strong automation features and extensive integration capabilities. It is recognized for improving business efficiency by automating workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:MagicDraw offers a straightforward installation process supported by self-service resources, catering to users who prefer a direct approach. WorkflowGen provides both cloud and on-premise deployment options alongside dedicated support services, offering more flexibility and personalized support for organizations seeking tailored services.

Pricing and ROI: MagicDraw has a higher initial setup cost but emphasizes delivering long-term value with its advanced modeling tools. WorkflowGen offers varied pricing tiers, delivering a compelling ROI through its efficiency and cost-saving capabilities. It is noted for its better ROI, streamlining operations effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed No Magic MagicDraw vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw vs. WorkflowGen

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Business Process Design

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), Process Automation (41st), Rapid Application Development Software (31st), Low-Code Development Platforms (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 1.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
No Magic MagicDraw	2.5%
WorkflowGen	1.8%
Other	95.7%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it to build the physical and logical domains to hold requirements, specifications, use cases, and all the way down to class definitions."

"We are getting away from the old ways of writing a lot of papers and requirements documents, architecture documents, technical solution documents, interface documents - those days are gone."

"I like the traceability feature. Whoever is working with the product would be sure of the things that could be affected if they decided to affect one of the other companies. For example, let's say that an engineer starts a new project optimization problem by adjusting the thickness of metal sheets. However, the engineers only see a reduced number of affections, but when we use the requirement traceability, they can see the whole picture. That's the main aspect that we were promoting with this tool."

"When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool; you can use it for business architecture design, for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise, for managing new product development from cradle to grave, and it enables you to generate a digital model of your product or service solution that can be run through simulations and tested before you spend a single penny on bending metal or configuring a new ERP software application, resulting in massive cost savings."

"The initial setup was not straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of No Magic MagicDraw is the simulation capabilities and interface."

"The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors."

"There is a lot of documentation available on the Internet to understand its functionality."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

"Took few hours to build workflows with ready-to-use templates, so we had improved productivity."

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

"It’s easier, more controlled and automatized checks of the budget through this system."

Cons

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect."

"For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things."

"The technical support is not very good."

"The documentation for MagicDraw and the video tutorials compared to other competitors is an area for improvement."

"However, there are some technical features that you have to study and do research on to be able to understand."

"It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with diagrams. They should expand the diagram types for the languages."

"The licenses are expensive compared to similar tools. At the moment, the user is open to using MagicDraw if it's 15% more than other solutions. If it were to cost any more, they wouldn't use it."

"There could be a trial version for students."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

"Yes, for email notification but it could also be with company network."

"The reports for users. The reports with more details; we have to generate them by the database."

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

21%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with model-based systems engineering tools, so I have experience with enterprise architecture management tools. I have experience with No Magic MagicDraw, as I deal with other solutions too....

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 17% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 10% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

IBM System Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 6% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Nintex Process Platform vs WorkflowGen

Compared 5% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs WorkflowGen

Compared 5% of the time

Jitterbit Vinyl vs WorkflowGen

Compared 5% of the time

CMW Tracker vs WorkflowGen

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs WorkflowGen

Compared 4% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

October 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

October 2026

Download WorkflowGen product report

Also Known As

MagicDraw

No data available

Overview

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

WorkflowGen streamlines process management with a customizable platform, catering to complex business needs through automation and seamless integration. It enhances operational efficiency and supports a wide range of applications.

Designed for professionals, WorkflowGen offers a comprehensive environment for building, deploying, and managing workflows. It integrates with existing enterprise systems, enabling businesses to automate workflows efficiently. With a focus on process improvement, it includes capabilities for analytics and compliance management, ensuring adaptability and scalability. This versatility makes WorkflowGen a strategic tool for enhancing performance.

What are the key features of WorkflowGen?

Web-Based Designer: Offers an intuitive interface to design workflows without needing advanced coding skills.
API Integration: Facilitates seamless connectivity with external systems to extend functionality.
Customizable Forms: Allows users to design forms tailored to business requirements.
Process Monitoring: Provides real-time insights and analytics to track process efficiency.
Mobile Access: Enables access to workflows on the go, ensuring flexibility and productivity.

What benefits should be noted in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Automates manual processes, reducing time and operational costs.
Scalability Potential: Adapts to growing business demands with minimal adjustments.
Compliance Management: Ensures regulatory compliance through robust process tracking.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates collaboration across departments by centralizing workflows.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases productivity by automating repetitive tasks.

WorkflowGen sees application in sectors like finance and healthcare, where workflow automation enhances regulatory compliance and improves service speed. In manufacturing, it optimizes production line management. It adapts to unique industry demands, offering a tailored approach to process enhancement and employee productivity.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw vs. WorkflowGen

November 2026

Free Report: No Magic MagicDraw vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our No Magic MagicDraw vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.