Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.7 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.

Get the OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is the #11 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools and #12 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Functional Testing for Developers an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Tricentis Tosca. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 73% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 20% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Functional Testing for Developers reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers mindshare

Product category:
Functional Testing Tools
As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 2.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers2.8%
Tricentis Tosca18.9%
BrowserStack10.7%
Other67.6%
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Functional Testing for Developers reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Tricentis ToscaAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional TestingAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs UiPath Test CloudAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.118.9%96%112 interviewsAdd to research
Katalon Studio3.9N/A89%47 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers excels in handling complex algorithms, supporting DevOps, integrating with ALM and Jenkins, and facilitating developer-friendly coding in C# and Java. Its integration with popular IDEs like Eclipse and Visual Studio appeals to developers. The support for multiple platforms and protocols, as well as AI-driven automation, enriches its versatility. The record and play features and object repository are highly valued by users, contributing to streamlined testing processes.
  • "We have UI controls in Infragistics logic that have been identified by OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, but those controls are not supported by TestComplete, which is what I find most valuable."
  • "OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio."
  • "OpenText UFT Developer works well with record technology, making it valuable for recording."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers requires improved integration with new technologies such as IoT, enhanced support for browsers beyond Safari, and better stability and performance. It should increase user customization, especially for visual impairments, and provide seamless integration with development tools. JavaScript support, headless scripting capabilities, and enhanced technology support should be added. Cross-browser parallel test execution and support for diverse platforms like mobile devices could be expanded. Interface improvements to simplify use are also necessary. Pricing and support need enhancement.
  • "In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary. This limits the technology's ability to recognize every object."
  • "The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites."
  • "There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."

ROI

Organizations may reduce technical test automation time by about 50% using OpenText Functional Testing for Developers. The ROI is significant when utilized broadly, as more usage decreases cost per capita. It proves cost-effective, particularly when transitioning from manual testing, offering approximately 70% to 80% savings. This tool enables entities to serve specific clientele and enhance testing, defect detection, and analysis across various products, which is crucial for maximizing its financial benefits.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers report that OpenText Functional Testing for Developers has high pricing and licensing costs. Setup costs are approximately €10,000, with annual fees reaching over $10,000 per floating license. Pricing varies by model, with options for cloud or on-premise pricing, and choices between seat and floating licenses. Despite integration benefits, these costs are considered higher compared to newer and open-source alternatives, although no additional fees are imposed beyond standard licensing expenses.
  • "If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."
  • "Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is utilized for automation and regression testing across various platforms, including Windows, web, and SAP environments. Users deploy it for cross-browser and mobile testing, integrating scenarios for functionality checks and performance monitoring. It's used on both on-premises and cloud models, validating banking applications, ERP systems, and GUIs. Many leverage it to automate tasks across diverse technologies, frequently applying it for parallel tests and unit testing on both web and desktop applications.

Service and Support

Feedback indicates mixed experiences with OpenText Functional Testing for Developers' support. Some report high accessibility and improvements over time, noting quick developer engagement for issues. Others face challenges with response times and complex support processes. Many appreciate detailed attention from developers during larger issues, yet others highlight slow, tiered resolution processes. A segment prefers more direct access to higher support levels, while additional feedback stresses a need for faster, more tailored responses.

Deployment

Multiple users found OpenText Functional Testing for Developers' initial setup straightforward and easy. It smoothly integrates with tools like Visual Studio or Eclipse and allows quick deployment. Some faced complexity due to specific integrations or unfamiliarity with the process. Installation can be hindered by issues with licenses or environment settings. Despite these challenges, most users reported quick resolutions with support and described the process as intuitive and efficient for those familiar with similar tools.

Scalability

Users find OpenText Functional Testing for Developers to be highly adaptable, allowing extensive scaling across diverse platforms and development environments. It leverages cloud capabilities and supports integration with tools like LeanFT, enabling broader script conversion and continuous testing. Its flexibility in team size and node control enhances its appeal. Although some see room for improvement in specific areas, many appreciate its versatility in handling complex test cases, accommodating both large enterprises and smaller teams effectively.

Stability

Users find OpenText Functional Testing for Developers to be generally stable, although there are mixed experiences. Some report issues tied to specific environments or complex tests, requiring workarounds or occasional restarts. Others highlight its steadiness compared to alternatives, praising recent improvements. New users notice ongoing enhancements, while experienced teams mention occasional integration challenges. In contrast, a few mention instability, requiring constant adaptations and affecting performance. Despite some bugs, many find it dependable if the environment is optimized.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business61
Midsize Enterprise29
Large Enterprise239
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Performing Arts
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Government
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
University
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare OpenText Functional Testing for Developers with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?
  • Complex Algorithm Handling: Manages complex scenarios with ease, including fuzzy logic.
  • Developer-friendly: Enables coding in C# and Java, integrating seamlessly with popular IDEs.
  • AI-based Object Recognition: Enhances test automation through advanced object identification.
  • Extensive Protocol Support: Supports a wide range of protocols for diverse testing requirements.
  • Seamless Integration: Connects effortlessly with ALM and Jenkins, promoting continuous development.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Functional Testing?
  • Efficient Test Automation: Streamlines test processes, optimizing resource allocation and reducing effort.
  • Multi-platform Flexibility: Facilitates cross-platform testing, accommodating desktop, web, and banking applications.
  • Reduced IT Workload: Simplifies automation tasks, decreasing the strain on IT resources.
  • Enhanced DevOps Support: Integrates well with DevOps practices for continuous testing advancements.

Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers was previously known as Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT.

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Related questions

  • 9
Which product supports Cross Browser Testing: UFT Developer or UFT One?
  • 23
Cross-Platform Automated Testing Tool
  • 127
Anyone have a good example of a Test Automation Business Case?
  • 10
When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 57
What is the best automation tool to test dynamic data?
  • 19
SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
  • 17
Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0
  • 130
What is the best tool for SAP testing?
  • 166
Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?
  • 309
What are some common causes for software failure?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Functional Testing Tools
Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
LambdaTest vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
LambdaTest vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Qt Squish vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Qt Squish vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Logo
Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.4.0We use OpenText UFT Developer for software and regression testing, mainly for GUI and web applications. It's user-friendly with good Visual Studio integration and excellent support, though object recognition could improve. It saves us 80% compared to manual testing.
Performance Lead Manager at Wipro Limited4.5I create workload models for performance testing, emphasizing stress, endurance, and spike scenarios. OpenText UFT Developer excels in supporting various protocols, but it can't match the speed of newer tools like NeoLoad for script creation and execution.
Process Architect Referent at Forvia3.0I use OpenText UFT Developer for ERP system functionality and appreciate its effective record technology. However, it could improve in handling desktop apps and websites, and its design and functionality need enhancements. I considered Tricentis Tosca before choosing this solution.
Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used OpenText Functional Testing for Developers for three years; it's great for cross-browser and AI-driven automation, though it's resource-heavy. Setup is easy, support is responsive, and it outperforms TestComplete in functionality for our needs.
AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation4.0I've used OpenText UFT Developer for web and SAP automation across platforms, finding it intuitive with easy scripting and strong resource availability. However, object recognition, particularly with calendar controls, needs improvement. My experience includes various tools, eventually integrating into UFT.
SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.4.0We use OpenText UFT Developer for functional testing of desktop and web applications. Its integration capabilities are valuable, but .NET and Visual Studio support need improvement. Despite being pricey, we've seen a 70% ROI compared to manual testing.
Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at iLAB LLC.3.5No summary available
Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available