ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ReadyAPI | 2.9% |
| Apache JMeter | 19.1% |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 15.7% |
| Other | 62.3% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Performance Testing Tools | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ReadyAPI vs Apache JMeter | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ReadyAPI vs BlazeMeter | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ReadyAPI vs Tricentis NeoLoad | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | N/A | 96% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
| Apache JMeter | 3.9 | 19.1% | 87% | 94 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 67 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 74 |
| Large Enterprise | 252 |
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
ReadyAPI was previously known as Ready API.
Healthcare Data Solutions (HDS)
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Lead QA Engineer at Msys Technologies | 3.5 | I use ReadyAPI for cost-effective comprehensive testing across security, performance, and functionality. Although Postman, JMeter, and SoapUI offer alternatives, ReadyAPI efficiently handles multiple testing types and addresses security issues, despite some manual updates needed for event listeners. |
| Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co. | 3.5 | I use ReadyAPI primarily for backend services, leveraging its Docker and cloud integration capabilities. It supports multiple protocols, enhancing workflow efficiency and reducing time to market. There's room for improvement with AWS integration and advanced functionalities. |
| QA Team Lead at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I use ReadyAPI for API and functional testing, transitioning from SoapUI. It's valuable for web service automation and data generation but requires complex Groovy scripting. Improvements in scripting simplicity and endpoint management would enhance its utility compared to JMeter. |
| Sr. QA Engineer at Arizona Department of Education | 3.5 | No summary available |
| Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba | 2.5 | I use ReadyAPI for comprehensive API testing, including functional, migration, and security tests. Its collaboration features, especially with Jira, and robust reporting are essential. However, I find the single-window interface limiting compared to SoapUI's multi-window capability. |
| Automation Analyst at Tata Consultancy | 4.5 | Our company uses ReadyAPI for API testing, benefiting from its extensive capabilities and ease of use. Despite some initial challenges with Groovy programming and Property Transfer, it offers significant time and cost savings, outperforming our previous tool, Parasoft SOAtest. |
| QA lead at Bank of Montreal | 3.5 | No summary available |
| Senior QA Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | Our web application relies on backend APIs, and we use ReadyAPI for automation due to its accessible features for testers. However, it is slow and has a complex interface, requiring UI improvements for a better user experience. |
