Red Hat Ceph Storage Reviews

Red Hat Ceph Storage's pricing is generally viewed as reasonable, aligning with the market, though some find it high. Licenses are often based on storage needs, such as 200 terabytes. Users may combine Ceph with OpenStack in subscription bundles. Expertise affects licensing decisions; experienced organizations may leverage open-source options, while others might invest in vendor support. Costs can vary significantly depending on storage needs and chosen support levels, influencing perceived value.

• "I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
• "The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."
• "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."

Red Hat Ceph Storage is primarily used for cloud integration, functioning as a backend for OpenStack and Kubernetes environments. Users employ it for block and object storage, supporting virtualization, hyperconverged systems, and container platforms like OpenShift. It handles archival and media storage needs, integrates with Proxmox and other traditional solutions, and operates in production environments. It serves private clouds, reliable storage, and large file system clusters in diverse deployments.

Users experience mixed support with Red Hat Ceph Storage. Some find technical assistance valuable and responsive, especially with paid options, yet others prefer community resources due to past experiences. Issues are often resolved in-house or via forums, without contacting support. Red Hat's technical help is seen as knowledgeable and proactive, yet some users believe response time could improve. Many opt for independent problem-solving or using forums and GitHub for assistance.

Many users found Red Hat Ceph Storage's initial setup straightforward, benefiting from automation tools and clear documentation. However, some described it as complex, needing significant technical research and planning. Using tools like ceph-deploy eased the process, while manual setups were time-consuming. Challenges included infrastructure preparation, hardware procurement, and networking configurations. Experience and Unix/Linux knowledge were advantageous, and the setup usually required a small team, varying in time from less than an hour to several days.

Red Hat Ceph Storage exhibits strong scalability features. Users note that adding nodes or disks enhances performance, though some mention minor latency issues. It is described as scale-out and nearly limitless. Planning for hardware is crucial. Deployment tools ease scalability, ensuring smooth adjustments. Ratings range from 4 to 8, with many praising its effectiveness in supporting increased data needs. Teams highlight its ability to scale without customer disruption, emphasizing its scalability as a crucial advantage.

Red Hat Ceph Storage is highly stable with most users citing minimal issues. Many rate its stability between seven and ten out of ten. Users appreciate its reliability but note potential complications during cluster expansion and recovery, particularly with low replication factors. Generally, Ceph is considered a stable choice with seamless performance in production environments and no major data loss incidents. A small number mention the need for improvements in specific scenarios like SC Linux contexts.