Top 10 Akamai Enterprise Application Access Alternatives

4.5 out of 5

4 reviews
100% willing to recommend

190 followers

Top Akamai Enterprise Application Access Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Akamai Enterprise Application Access based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Akamai Enterprise Application Access surpasses its competitors by offering robust zero-trust security, seamless user experience, and comprehensive access controls, ensuring secure remote access without a VPN, which enhances operational efficiency and streamlines secure employee access to critical applications.

Akamai Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Akamai, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Entra ID

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft Entra ID

4.3 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access provides competitive pricing, robust support, and secure remote access, making it suitable for easy integration with existing infrastructure. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID excels in advanced identity management and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, offering comprehensive features and strong security for enterprises.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a moderate setup cost while Microsoft Entra ID is known for its lower initial setup expense. The difference in setup cost could be a significant factor for initial budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access is valued for its simplicity and affordability, making it suitable for quick implementations. In comparison, Prisma Access features advanced security and tool integration, targeting enterprises needing comprehensive protection, despite its higher cost and more elaborate setup process.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly at the initial stages, whereas Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher initial setup investment, reflecting its advanced feature set and targeted user base.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access excels with efficient infrastructure integration and strong authentication, appealing for its simplicity. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform offers comprehensive zero trust features and cloud-native deployment, attracting buyers with enhanced scalability and advanced security despite higher costs.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

iboss

4.2 out of 5

iboss

4.2 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers robust access control features and seamless integration, while iboss excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive cloud security. In comparison, Akamai's straightforward setup and active customer support stand out, while iboss provides cost efficiency and strong security features.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. iboss Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access users find the setup cost high but worth the investment, while iboss users appreciate the lower setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access users find the setup cost high but worth the investment, while iboss users appreciate the lower setup cost.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps offers ease of integration and advanced threat protection, attracting those invested in Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access focuses on secure access and robust DDoS protection, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive security despite higher costs.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps Report

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps has a straightforward setup cost, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access features a more complex pricing structure. Notably, Microsoft focuses on ease of setup, contrasting with Akamai's more intricate entry process.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Cloudflare One

4.4 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access excels in integration and security for enterprises emphasizing robust protocols. In comparison, Cloudflare One offers network performance and zero trust security, appealing to businesses valuing ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness. Pricing highlights different priorities: security precision versus adaptability.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Cloudflare One Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access involves a high setup cost, while Cloudflare One offers lower upfront expenses. This significant difference impacts the initial investment required, highlighting their distinct pricing strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope

4.2 out of 5

Netskope

4.2 out of 5

Netskope provides seamless integration with existing security frameworks, offering secure web gateway and cloud security capabilities. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers enhanced security with strong access management and scalability, appealing to organizations prioritizing robust protection and comprehensive application visibility.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Netskope Report

Pricing

Netskope offers competitive setup costs that are generally perceived as lower and smoother compared to Akamai Enterprise Application Access, which requires a more detailed and potentially costly configuration phase.

View comparison

Pricing

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access emphasizes robust security and ease of access, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing application performance and global scalability. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform integrates networking and security in one platform, appealing to those seeking a unified, feature-rich solution.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Cato SASE Cloud Platform Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a higher setup cost compared to Cato SASE Cloud Platform. The significant difference in setup costs makes Cato SASE more budget-friendly than Akamai for initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Okta Workforce Identity

4.3 out of 5

Okta Workforce Identity

4.3 out of 5

Okta Workforce Identity offers single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and application integration. In comparison, Akamai Enterprise Application Access provides zero trust security and secure application access without a VPN. Okta simplifies usability and integration, while Akamai focuses on robust security and zero trust access.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Okta Workforce Identity Report

Pricing

Okta Workforce Identity involves a higher setup cost, while Akamai Enterprise Application Access offers a lower initial expenditure. Okta provides more comprehensive features, whereas Akamai focuses on cost-efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

4.4 out of 5

Akamai Enterprise Application Access emphasizes seamless integration and user authentication for enterprises seeking scalable zero-trust security and ease of integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides comprehensive threat protection, global network access, and a broad range of security features for expansive enterprise security needs.

Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report

Pricing

Akamai Enterprise Application Access typically involves a higher setup cost than Check Point Harmony SASE, reflecting its comprehensive security features, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cost-effective setup without compromising essential security functionalities.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 5 more products

Related categories

ZTNA as a Service

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Access Management