ARCON Privileged Access Management provides effective security and compliance through features like password vaulting and session recording, ensuring controlled access to critical systems with user-friendly management and dual-factor authentication.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ARCON Privileged Access Management | 2.2% |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Manager | 9.8% |
| One Identity Safeguard | 4.3% |
| Other | 83.7% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Privileged Access Management (PAM) | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Idira Privileged Access Manager | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ARCON Privileged Access Management vs One Identity Safeguard | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Okta Platform | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idira Privileged Access Manager | 4.3 | 9.8% | 95% | 230 interviewsAdd to research |
| Saviynt Identity Cloud | 3.7 | 3.2% | 80% | 27 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 102 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 35 |
| Large Enterprise | 111 |
ARCON Privileged Access Management enhances security by monitoring remote access to critical servers and networks. It records user activities, supports just-in-time access, and manages passwords with vaulting. These capabilities help in maintaining compliance and protecting sensitive data against unauthorized use. Its integration with dual-factor authentication and ability to log server interactions make it suitable for environments requiring strict auditability and access monitoring across platforms.
What key features define ARCON Privileged Access Management?ARCON Privileged Access Management is implemented in industries demanding secured access to critical infrastructure, including finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. Organizations utilize its capabilities to control administrative access, protect sensitive data, and ensure comprehensive logging and monitoring, which are vital for maintaining stringent security standards and compliance.
ARCON Privileged Access Management was previously known as ARCON ARCOS, ARCON PAM.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| System and DBA at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I access our server using ARCON Privileged Access Management, ensuring enhanced security with two-factor authentication, session monitoring, and activity recording. While beneficial, adding login information would help verify user authenticity. Previously, IT managed our RDP policies, but priorities shifted. |
| Assistant Vice President at Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India Ltd. | 5.0 | I use ARCON Privileged Access Management to record user actions after logging into systems. It effectively records video commands used, but logging in is slower than direct access. We haven't used other solutions, and scalability could be improved. |
| Zonal Credit Head at ICICIBANK Ltd | 4.0 | I have used ARCON Privileged Access Management at my company due to management's decision, and while the solution is generally effective, it lacks the ability to unlock user IDs when they get locked, which needs improvement. |
| SME for Cybersecurity at Locuz Enterprise Solutions Ltd | 3.5 | I use ARCON Privileged Access Management for secure connectivity and compliance, benefiting from its password vaulting and command blacklisting features. While it stabilizes infrastructure, adding AI and browser isolation could further improve security by enhancing detection and preventing cache-based attacks. |
| PAM Consultant at ProNoesis | 4.0 | During my training, I used ARCON PAM and now support a banking client using it. It's agile and frequently updated with a robust interface, but I encountered compatibility and password reset issues. Troubleshooting could be time-consuming without a patch. |
| Chief Technology Officer, Senior Executive Vice President at Midland Bank Plc | 2.5 | We use ARCON Privileged Access Management to monitor and record admin activity. However, it lacks a notification feature, is complex and not user-friendly, and requires high expertise to navigate its challenging product flow between screens. |
| Assistant Manager at Axis Bank | 3.5 | We use ARCON Privileged Access Management primarily for remote server access for common users. I find its intuitive interface valuable, though it sometimes gets stuck between servers, which I hope will improve. We haven't considered or used other solutions. |
| Cyberark and Unix Administrator at Wipro Limited | 4.0 | I use ARCON Privileged Access Management mainly for managing storage account passwords and maintaining user activity logs. While I previously used CyberArk, I switched due to industry issues. An improvement I suggest is implementing password rotation for service accounts. |
| Solution Engineer-Cyber Security at Asia Pacific Technology Systems Pvt Ltd | 3.5 | ARCON Privileged Access Management effectively resolves lagging issues, particularly in Linux environments, with strong session monitoring features. Improvements could include performance optimization and clearer licensing information. Clients are attracted by its competitive pricing compared to BeyondTrust. |
| Cyber Security Engineer at Rah Infotech Pvt Ltd | 4.5 | I find ARCON Privileged Access Management effective in protecting sensitive company data by preventing unauthorized sharing and alerting admins of potential malicious activities. However, I would prefer if it operated on Windows rather than being dependent on Linux. |
Positive
We have used ARCON Privileged Access Management for recording videos of user actions taken after logging into systems. Around thirty people, including network engineers, server engineers, and application engineers, use it in the company.
There hasn't been a notable financial benefit for our company from using ARCON Privileged Access Management. However, it provides good support for our compliance and security needs.
Recording all videos of commands entered into devices is highly valuable. The video recording of user actions after login is impactful.
There is often a slow response when logging into routers, switches, or servers compared to direct access. Scalability could be improved.
We have used ARCON Privileged Access Management for around four years.
ARCON Privileged Access Management is a stable solution. I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
The scalability is around eight out of ten. It could be more scalable.
The technical support is excellent. I would rate it ten out of ten.
Positive
We have only used ARCON Privileged Access Management.
The setup and configuration took about one month and involved six engineers.
The implementation involved around six engineers from our side.
The pricing is considered not expensive and is best priced.
I would recommend ARCON Privileged Access Management to others.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
I use the solution in my company since the product is very good.
In one of the use cases attached to the solution, I remember that an ID got locked after being unable to unlock the ID three or four times as per company policy. As per the organization's policy, if you try to run a password three or four times, it will get locked. No options are available in ARCON Privileged Access Management to unlock a locked ID.
Some options are required in the tool, especially to help in scenarios where if a user's ID gets locked, that person cannot unlock the ID from ARCON Privileged Access Management. Even the technical team in my company cannot unlock any locked ID with the help of the tool. Even if there is an admin password, ARCON Privileged Access Management releases it using its functionalities, allowing users to generate a password during an emergency. If an ID gets locked, the tool cannot unlock it, making it an area where improvements are required.
I have been using ARCON Privileged Access Management for ten years.
Considering that the product has been used in my company for more than ten years, I can say that the stability part is good.
I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.
It is a scalable solution.
The product's deployment phase was easy.
Before ARCON Privileged Access Management, my company had used many solutions. My organization started to use ARCON Privileged Access Management since it was a management decision.
The credential part of the product needs to be improved so that the tool can improve our company's security posture.
The session monitoring and recording features in the product are okay.
I recommend the product for huge organizations.
The product's ability to offer supportive scalability features for our organization is good.
The value of using the tool stems from the fact that it is useful in areas like remote control and password encryption.
I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
ARCON can be used to protect privileged entities by granting access via remote RDP, SSH, or recorded systems. Any activity on the server, endpoint, or network device is recorded for compliance.
Traffic is routed through a gateway, which enhances security by not requiring many open ports. This provides secure connectivity between the end user and the servers. ARCON also has password vaulting features, so passwords are not shared with users.
Additionally, ARCON allows for just-in-time access to privileged terminals when needed and has implemented approval levels for access to critical servers.
The session management capabilities are helpful. The session recording feature for system handling is good. It also eliminates the need to open many ports for end-users, simplifying access.
Only one port needs to be opened from the user's machine to the PAM server, and the PAM gateway will connect to the end server. This can be customized to use custom ports, further enhancing security.
The vaulting feature is valuable. Another feature I like is the ability to blacklist critical commands, preventing them from running on the server.
The solution could be more stable as we've encountered bugs and issues.
I'd also suggest adding a browser isolation feature to prevent cache storage on endpoints and mitigate cache-based attacks. This could be crucial as many attacks originate from browsers.
In future releases, I would like to see AI features added. It would be beneficial for tasks like detecting malicious activity during sessions, enhancing response capabilities, and providing hunting queries for log analysis.
I have been using it for more than two years.
We've faced disconnection issues and problems with the high availability solution not switching over properly between primary and secondary servers.
Maintenance is definitely required for the database and other components, but it's not overly complex.
Scalability becomes challenging as the number of accounts increases, as it's an on-premises solution. I'm not sure if ARCON has moved towards the cloud, but the version I worked with was on-premises only.
It's not very satisfactory. We've found it difficult to get timely responses and resolutions. We don't always get priority support. So, there is room for improvement in the response time.
Neutral
It indirectly saves a lot by providing security to critical infrastructure. The recording and auditing features deter illegal or suspicious activities, ultimately saving money and time.
I would give it a seven out of ten. It's not bad, but it could be improved.
I would definitely recommend it if it fits their needs, but if they have access to better solutions like CyberArk, they could explore those.
During my training days, I used ARCON PAM as part of mandatory training. I even installed a version on my personal portal back then. Currently, I support a banking client who has implemented ARCON in their organization.
ARCON PAM has several strengths. Firstly, they are very agile and constantly evolving their solution to meet the changing needs of their clients. They don't just stick to a base version; instead, they actively enhance and improve it based on client feedback and industry trends. Secondly, their management interface is robust, although it can be complex. They provide comprehensive data and analytics to help organizations manage privileged access effectively. Additionally, they regularly introduce new features such as RPA to stay relevant and innovative in the market.
One common problem I faced with ARCON PAM was compatibility issues with certain software versions. For example, if a user was using a non-supported SQL version, they would encounter errors. Resolving these issues often involved troubleshooting for days, and if no solution was found, we had to raise a ticket with the OEM for a patch. Additionally, there were occasional issues with password resets.
The most effective features of ARCON PAM for securing privileged access are password rotation and password vaulting. Password vaulting ensures secure storage and monitoring of privileged passwords. Additionally, the solution offers an arch and light environment tailored specifically to client requirements, which enhances security without unnecessary complexity.
The session management and monitoring capabilities of ARCON PAM greatly impact security posture. For instance, in banking environments in India, session monitoring helps provide detailed logs and even video recordings of user sessions. This ensures transparency and accountability and allows organizations to detect any unexpected activities or unauthorized access.
The user interface of ARCON PAM is generally user-friendly, but it requires some training for users to get accustomed to it. Basic instructions are provided for logging in and using features like multi-factor authentication. However, additional guidance may be needed for users who are not familiar with the system, as they might encounter simple issues that require clarification.
I would recommend ARCON PAM primarily for small to medium-sized organizations across various industries such as banking, insurance, finance, and healthcare. While it can also scale for larger organizations, it is particularly well-suited for medium-sized companies. Compared to other solutions like CyberArk, ARCON PAM offers similar capabilities at a more affordable price point which makes it a cost-effective choice for organizations with limited budgets or specific deployment requirements.
Overall, I would rate ARCON PAM as an eight out of ten. To make it a ten out of ten, they should focus on enhancing the user interface to make it more intuitive and user-friendly. Additionally, reducing dependency on specific browsers and versions would improve flexibility and ease of deployment for clients.
ARCON Privileged Access Management lacks a notification feature. The solution is very complex to use, and its product flow is not that good. ARCON Privileged Access Management is not a user-friendly solution, and the application flow from one screen to another is very complex. You need high expertise and skills to use the solution.
I have been using ARCON Privileged Access Management for one year.
ARCON Privileged Access Management is a scalable solution that takes a long time to scale. Around 20 administrators are using ARCON Privileged Access Management in our organization.
The solution’s initial setup was very complex.
The solution’s pricing is neither cheap nor expensive.
I am using the latest version of ARCON Privileged Access Management.
Since ARCON Privileged Access Management is very complex and not that user-friendly, I'll tell people to check it carefully before purchasing it.
Overall, I rate ARCON Privileged Access Management a five out of ten.
Our primary use case is for using servers or accessing servers remotely, mostly for common users.
The most valuable feature is it is easy to use and the interface is intuitive.
Sometimes it gets stuck between servers and I would like to see this improved in the future.
I have been using ARCON Privileged Access Management for the past six months.
There is stability.
The scalability is good and we have around ten thousand users currently.
I did use technical support but I was disappointed.
I would recommend and rate ARCON Privileged Access Management a seven on a scale of one to ten.
We mainly use ARCON Privileged Access Management for managing the storage account password. Additionally, we maintain user activity logs from the server end to end.
By manually keeping the user logs, we can understand and manage all the operationalized tasks.
In terms of improvements, I suggest implementing password rotation for service-based accounts, as that should be included.
The solution has high stability. I would rate it nine out of ten.
When I have a script-related issue, I get delayed responses from technical support.
Positive
I previously used CyberArk. Due to issues with the industry, I switched to ARCON.
The initial setup was easy, as the project development is straightforward in ARCON.
The deployment was done by an integrator.
I don't have specific information on the ROI or pricing details. I have no involvement in pricing.
I did not evaluate other solutions.
I would recommend ARCON Privileged Access Management to others.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
One standout feature of ARCON is its ability to resolve lagging issues, especially noticeable in Linux environments. Beyond that, it matches up well in terms of capacity with other products, though some minor quirks may pop up, but those have been successfully addressed for the customers I have worked with. Additionally, ARCON's session monitoring and recording features are quite good.
A few areas for improvement in ARCON would be performance optimization, ensuring smoother management. Also, clarity on licensing mechanisms, particularly regarding user accounts, could use some improvement. It would be great if these details were readily available on the website for easy access and communication with customers.
I have been working with ARCON Privileged Access Management for six months.
My clients have not had any stability issues with ARCON.
When it comes to scalability, ARCON PAM is generally good. However, a bit more clarity on how the licensing handles additional privileged users would be beneficial.
My clients using ARCON PAM typically fall into the SMB category, with user numbers usually less than 500.
Clients have been drawn to ARCON Privileged Access Management mainly because of its competitive pricing compared to BeyondTrust.
In the environment I have worked with, a team of around 17 in the IT department manages ARCON. However, when it comes to handling the solution, two people are enough for smooth operation.
Based on my experience with ARCON PAM, I would give it a solid seven out of ten. In my six months of selling the product, I haven't received many complaints.
Many hackers or cyber attackers think about getting access to confidential user data of a company or other security information. ARCON Privileged Access Management protects such sensitive information and documents.
The solution monitors that no privileged users indulge in malicious code or click on malicious links. An employee who wants to share sensitive information outside the organization won't be able to share such data because of this solution. Notifications are sent by this solution to the network admin whenever a malicious activity is practiced.
The notification alert feature where the network admin gets notified of probable malicious activity is the most valuable feature.
I would like for it to be dependent on Windows as opposed to Linux.
I have been using this solution for one and a half years.
This is a stable solution.
The solution is scalable. I have provided this solution to almost ten customers, including multiple government banks.
Customer service is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
The initial setup was straightforward for this solution. The setup time depends upon the complexity of the customer network and hardware dependencies. It takes about three to four hours to set up.
For the solution deployment, first, we need to check the predictive data for SQL Injection. Then the SQL server will be introduced to the IaaS. Using the installation kit provided by our company, we can run the commands. We can also set up and monitor the GUI. For the deployment of this solution, only one technical provider is needed.
The license is available device-based and user-based. They also provide a bundle for end-user devices and licenses combined.
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
