It is used in the same way that Azure and IBM BPM work.
We use the Camunda Platform for Banking services.
It is used in the same way that Azure and IBM BPM work.
We use the Camunda Platform for Banking services.
Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate.
It is divided across the platform.
The integration is separated as well as the UI, and the internal work.
It also integrates well.
I would like to see better pricing.
I have been using the Camunda Platform for a couple of months.
Camunda Platform can be deployed both on-premises and on the cloud.
We are not using the most recent version, but an internet version while the Cloud version is being developed.
We are currently using the Enterprise Edition.
The Camunda Platform is stable enough.
Camunda is a scalable solution.
We have 10 to 15 users per site.
We have not contacted technical support.
The installation is quite straightforward.
You log into the Camunda website and download the folder to install it directly.
The installation process took 20 to 25 minutes.
We configured the integration and the UI.
Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees.
We have not yet explored all that Camunda Platform offers.
We would recommend this solution to others who are considering using it.
I would rate Camunda Platform a nine out of ten.
We are currently concentrating majorly on our clients in telecommunication. We are also working with new and existing federal clients and proposing Camunda Platform to them.
We are using its latest version. We are currently in the development phase. It is in our local environment, but we are planning to be cloud-based. Going forward, we will create a Jenkins Pipeline and deploy it onto the Azure cloud.
It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases.
They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome.
I have been using this solution for five years.
It is stable. I didn't face any issues in the production or development phase.
I have interacted with their technical support, and they are very helpful. When I have to work on any POC, I also directly work with the product team.
Its initial setup is straightforward.
I would advise others to verify the technology stack that they already have in place. They should check the orchestration part and see if they need to take care of any redesigning.
I would rate Camunda Platform a nine out of ten.
We recently finished a proof of concept with Comunda, and it was successful.
Because it's a complete solution, you can start modeling to automate processes. We can also develop projects with a high degree of collaboration, which is precious for us, especially during this pandemic when we are often isolated.
Within our organization, there are roughly 20 employees using this solution.
The collaboration capabilities have proven to be a great asset during this pandemic. We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation.
As I mencioned, we've just finished a proof of concept, so our experience with the tool is still very recent. In general, it mets ours expectations.
Something that could be improoved is the capabilitie of integranting different modeling tools, in order to facilitate both the import and export of models.
I have been using Camunda BPM since January 2020.
As we are still relatively new to this solution, I can't really comment on the stability; however, I know some people in the government who use this solution and they are very satisfied with the stability.
We have actually never need to consult technical support, so I can't comment on them.
I know that the IT team needed some help, fortunately, we have a good connection with them, so we worked together to set things up. In the beginning, it was kind of hard.
As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month.
My advice: try it because it's a great solution.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Camunda BPM a rating of nine. If the initial setup was easier, I would give it a ten.
We use Camunda Platform for automating networking business processes.
The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs.
Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow.
I have been using Camunda Platform for approximately one year.
Camunda Platform is a stable solution. However, we recently lost a lot of data because the solution's database was down.
I rate Camunda Platform a seven to eight out of ten for stability.
The solution's initial setup is quite straightforward. I rate Camunda Platform a six or seven out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.
Camunda Platform's deployment was done in a day.
Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective.
Overall, I rate Camunda Platform a seven or eight out of ten.
We are using the product as an OAM that we have included in our software product. We are offering a private cloud solution and we sell it and deploy it to our customers.
We are using it to create a low-code solution for strategic planning and performance management in order to automate the management processes such as planning, performance management, governance processes, and business process management as a whole.
We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well.
The stability of the solution is quite good.
Technical support is good for getting alerts about bugs.
The form builder that will be utilized in the system and the data monitor both need improvement at this time. I want to exchange the data between the activity and UI basis. Currently, they are using a JSON file, which needs to be improved. We need something that can be used as a user interface and the user can make the data binding and exchange data between the activities.
This is what we did ourselves. We had the engine itself and we created a data monitor and formed it on top of it. This is what is missing in the system.
The initial setup can be complex for business users.
There occasionally be some bugs in the solution.
The solution needs to offer more languages such as Chinese, Arabic, Hebrew, et cetera.
The system is stable. This is why we selected it. Based on other products, we've found the most appropriate results coming out from the Camunda BPM engine. It's very good.
There are occasionally a few bugs, however, we are quite capable of dealing with them.
Since we are using Camunda as a core solution, a core engine of our system, we are going to continue using it. I'm not willing to change it down the line. There's no plan for us to change it and we are not thinking about changing it. It has all functionalities and we are using about 50% of the engine itself in terms of its capability. We will continue to invest in utilizing all Camunda functionalities in the BPM engine.
In terms of technical support, we are using basic technical support as we are a technical organization. We are a software house. Our team is professional and they have experience in Java and private cloud technology. They are able to fix any issue.
That said, there are certain bugs in Camunda. They are publishing information about them from time to time. We study the tool very carefully. Support from Camunda doesn't mean too much to us actually, as, in our organization, we have about 380 employees, and the majority of them are Java developers. We take the basic support to track the bugs only.
Positive
I also have some experience using Visio as business process management and ARIS as well as Bizagi.
We are partners of Software AG webMethods as an automation tool. We are using Mendix and OutSystems as a low-code solution. ARIS, webMethods, Mendix, and OutSystems are what we mainly use.
You cannot compare Camunda with ARIS since ARIS is only for our documentation, business process documentation. You cannot compare it with Camunda. It is a totally different scope. However, in comparison between Mendix, OutSystems, and webMethods, they are very expensive tools and ultimately provide the same functionality, yet they are not using a pure BPMN XML. Maybe transferring the workflow between those systems doesn't work. That said, the consistency between, for example, Bonitasoft and Camunda and Bizagi is a matter of import and export. Between other systems such as webMethods and OutSystems and Mendix, for example, in webMethods, they are only still using an enhanced BPM engine mainly, meaning that they are not using the pure or the standard BPM notation. The same applies to Mendix and OutSystems.
The initial setup, for business users, is complex. If you compare it with cloud systems and Mendix, it is complicated. It has a very strong and very rigid back-end BPM engine and it's more trustworthy if XML files have been generated from Camunda. The quality of the XML file being generated from Camunda, the XML files of BPMN, is more trustworthy than other systems. That's why we selected it. This is the main reason that we selected it.
With the Camunda installer, the deployment of just the solution is pretty fast.
However, the automation process with the current functionality, meaning with the missing functionality of data monitor and data binding and with the lack of proper UI representation, it took us a year to develop those components to have a low-code solution on top of it.
Now, with our low-code solution on top, it will take us one to two days to have a visible process automated.
We are an integrator and we are consultants in business process management, and we are developing a tool on top of it. Therefore, we help our clients to implement. However, when we originally installed Camunda, we handled the process ourselves. The way we do things now, we try to make it easier for clients.
We are using a developer license. I can't speak to exactly how much we are paying, or exactly what license type that we are using. I'm not the technical lead or the solution delivery team. Therefore, I can't answer this question.
We did a lot of POCs on available products in the market, such as Bonitasoft, Camunda, Bizagi, so on. However, based on that POCs, we found that the best way to go forward in our solution in terms of the functionality and the accuracy of the XML files. If they could be generated by Camunda it can be more useful for us to adopt in our solution.
We are users of the solution.
We are the latest version due to the fact that we are developing our own product based on Camunda. We are developing a solution based on Camunda. We are a heavy user of Camunda.
Camunda is not so popular in the market due to the UI (meaning the form builder, the way of developing the forms which would be attached to the process), and the data monitor (how to exchange the data between the activities).
A company would need to create an integration framework between Camunda and other systems. If they sold their offering with the UI and data monitor it would be the biggest automation tool ever.
For us, with our experience with using the tool, you need a good developer to be able to use the system effectively. Other than that there are no issues. For an organization that wants to adopt Camunda, they need to have the proper resources, and the proper training to use the system.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. There's a bug inside the BPMN monitor that knocks a few points off the rating. If the system is not saved, it will crash.
We use the BPMN flows for order capturing of our end-to-end customer journey. There are many intermediate flows and we mainly use the tax delegate part of it.
We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before.
I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas.
We have used this solution for one year.
This is a stable solution.
We have a support contract this has been working fine for us till now.
We previously used a product from Ericsson.
The initial setup is a bit complex.
The learning curve is a bit steep. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We use the free version because our organization is a consulting organization and we work normally for customers. My primary use case is for training and modeling purposes.
I use the BPMN and the DMN model.
The most valuable feature is that it is easy to use. I train my colleagues and customers and I don't want them to need to learn how the solution works. I want to be the one who learns about the product and teach them BPMN.
It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen.
The documentation could use improvement.
I have been using Camunda for two years.
For modeling it's very stable. At the execution level, I don't have experience.
I think it is scalable, but I don't have experience with scaling it.
The initial setup of this platform was very simple.
Often more functions will make a model or tool more complex. I like the simplicity of Camunda. It is very easy to use.
I'm the Leader of the Center of Excellence at my company with 18 years of experience in BPM platforms, and my team works with Camunda on several different projects where we deploy Camunda either on-premises at our clients' sites or through the cloud.
Our clients that are using Camunda range from a large enterprise media company in Brazil to banks and central industry (e.g. energy industry). We have found it to be very useful in multiple segments of any enterprise. We now have about 1,000 users of Camunda in all.
I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable. Personally, I also like that the Camunda platform as a whole helps us to easily measure the life cycle of all the relevant processes. For example, the Camunda platform includes Cawemo for business analysts, Cockpit for process engine configuration, and modeling tools for developers. Then you have Optimize, which is helpful in managing processes and continuously improving on them.
We haven't run into many problems, because Camunda provides everything we need to delegate solutions for all the technologies (for example, Java clusters) and programming languages that we use. However, I do think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack.
I have been using Camunda for eight years.
Camunda is very reliable but you need to understand the process engineer execution in order to provide solutions that are synchronized and, thus, stable.
It's a very scalable platform in my experience.
The Camunda installation is very simple. For example, if your project requires standalone applications, Camunda can provide the necessary external components to complete the installation. The setup can be a little more complex when compared with other applications such as JBoss, but overall it only needs a few extra configuration steps.
The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable.
I feel that the Camunda engine is a very scalable platform, and compares well with many other BPM platforms that I work with.
I would rate Camunda a ten out of ten.
The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance.
I've been using this solution for over five years.
This is a stable product - it works and doesn't disturb me or the IT director.
I previously used Activiti, but it had no well-developed tools to monitor administration or develop new processes.
Our initial setup was quite complex and took around six months due to some bureaucratic issues. However, I think that it could be faster for organizations without such issues.
This isn't a very expensive solution, and it's cheaper than its competitors in terms of licensing and resources.
Functional agility is the main reason we use this platform. I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.
We are using the Camunda Platform to build data models.
The solution is good for data models.
I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future.
I rate Camunda Platform for approximately two years.
We have many people in my organization using this solution.
I have not contacted support, we use our internal IT team for support.
I have used other solutions previously, such as Signavio.
We have an annual subscription to this solution.
I would not recommend this solution because I did not have a good experience.
I rate Camunda Platform a five out of ten.

Check SpiffWorkflow.org
Our pricing is much much more accessible.
We are an open-source, low-code process automation tool, developed on top of a Python visual workflow library and use standard BPMN.
You can e-mail me for more information:
elizabeth.cruz (at) sartography (dot) com