Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews

We use AppSec. The primary use case was for our client's app. We did a successful project with the biggest university in Mexico. It was a big survey for all the former students. There were thousands of them, and it needed to be completed based on some specifications from the security team.

The service was available for the client on time. They had a go-to-market or a due date to start sending the app to various students to apply. We were there 24/7 hoping and waiting for everything to be fine, and it worked perfectly and smoothly.

The client was very happy with the performance of Check Point on this project. When comparing it with Imperva, we strongly feel that the formula that Check Point delivers on WAF was what the client needed.

Check Point CloudGuard works perfectly for preemptively blocking Zero Day attacks and detecting hidden anomalies. Check Point is all about prevention. We strongly believe that if you want to prevent threats, Check Point is the one. There is no one else.

There are two main features. The first valuable feature is that it is not a complex process to get it up and running. It was not complex at all. We were in a close relationship with the team that developed the app, and it worked in a few hours.

The second valuable feature is the information that comes out of it. With the dashboard or the information that came from it, we made some executive reports for the client. They were very happy with it.

I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service. I would like the complete visibility of every product for the client to see in an executive way. I do not want it in a very complex way with so many warnings and threats. They should focus on the main things in all the products. I would like to see that.

We started using it six months ago.

Its stability is perfect. We have had no issues.

It is made for scalability. We have no issues on the matter. 

Check Point helped us a lot with the project. We interacted with Check Point engineers. They knew it was our first project, and we came across as one strong team in front of the client. I would rate their customer service and support a ten out of ten.

Positive

The client had Imperva, but for this project, they used Check Point. They have some current contracts and some expiration dates. We are hoping to have more deals with them.

They went for this solution for multiple reasons. The first reason was our service as a partner. The client needed somebody to handle the solution. They are not specialists in handling WAF or security. The second reason was that Check Point has authority over security. We were not delivering a solution that was new in the market. We were not an underdog. The third reason was that when we did the workshop, not a POV, the client saw that the solution was intuitive. The dashboards were executive. They liked it a lot. It provided visibility to focus on the efforts. It gave a list of all the threats. It was focused on the main ideas and threats.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF can reduce the total cost of ownership for your web application firewall, but in this case, it was not a big deal. 

Our client could see that they can have a great solution that does not cost much more than Imperva.

It is not cheap, but it is worth it. For this project, our channel manager and our territory manager helped us a lot. We got a lot of flexibility on the license. I do not know how much discount there was, but it was big enough to win the opportunity.

For those evaluating WAF solutions, there are so many options, but I would recommend relying on a company like Check Point that has a great ecosystem. Their solutions are not only made for the cloud. They also have specialization in all types of security. With their AI and ThreatCloud, you have information about what is happening in the security world. The information that they provide is very useful, so rely on a company that is big enough to provide the security that you deserve.

In this project, there were a lot of technical issues that we had to manage through our engineers. It was our first project and the interaction with the development teams was important. It was very important to get the due dates and stay on track. For a successful project, you need to have a close interaction with the client, especially if the client is not a specialist in security. Check Point also helped us a lot with this project.

Overall, I would rate Check Point CloudGuard WAF a ten out of ten.

The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected. If you configure it right, it works perfectly.

You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so.

I've been working with the solution for about a year.

The solution is stable. It doesn't matter which device is running Check Point. The solution works. It has never gone down. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

My clients are large, but they are not enterprise-sized or small.

I rate the initial setup a five out of ten because it is easy if you have the required knowledge and difficult if you are new to the system. The challenge isn't installing it: "Next, next, next, finish." Even a less knowledgeable person can do that. The challenge is configuring the system. There are a lot of blades in CloudGuard. You need to keep each type of security in your view, except for the Check Point view.

The initial setup is very fast, but you need to pray that the solution does all the work itself.

Other unified platforms like QRadar and Cisco are comparatively easier to use.

You need someone knowledgeable to run the system. Today, with all the technology and everything, the company just wants to buy control and be lazy. "Let Check Point do the work." But this does not happen with Check Point because you need professional eyes. Check Point's price is very low compared to those controlling the system. You have to learn to investigate the solution to work better with it. The knowledge costs more than the system. The solution has a hybrid deployment, and I don't know a company that only chooses one deployment or another.

There is no support available for Check Point. There are things you have to look for, and that's it.

Check Point is the world's first and probably best security company. They might change its face, give it new names, separate into new models, and so on, but in the end, they are the best security company in the world. I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We require the use of a solid security tool for our websites provisioned in Microsoft Azure App Service, which is used for internal use by the company and for external use by the client.

The key requirements that we needed to solve were to have automated protection, to have little administration in addition to providing few false positives, all this was successfully solved or provided through CloudGuard Application Security, in addition to the fact that we were able to centralize everything in the whole family. 

Thanks to the centralized use of Check Point CloudGuard App Security we managed to have protection for our Windows and Linux sites, in addition to having little interaction with exceptions due to having this tool in prevention mode.

This tool does not require a lot of learning time, it is incredible. With other tools, adaptation time is required, which with Check Point is not necessary.

We have also been able to find a sensible implementation of the application, providing confidence and business peace of mind.

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security offers us many virtues, the ones we liked the most were:

• Easy and simple implementation from the Check Point Infinity portal

• Very few false positives, which generates a lot of confidence in the product

• The portal is quite intuitive

• The solution does not require much time to adapt to the sites and applications it protects.

In itself, the application really meets our expectations. At the management level, the solution is what was needed to protect this area of the company's infrastructure.

This Check Point solution is an extremely complete security solution, it is really amazing. However, there are always improvements that can be made to all of the tools.

We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients or is a point of consideration.

Regarding the documentation, starting implementation was not so clear. We had to validate several guides until we could do it correctly.

Finally, we would like the Infinity portal perform better.

During this last year we have been adding the use of CloudGuard checkpoint for the protection of our infrastructure in Microsoft Azure.

It is a cloud solution, managed by Check Point. So far we have not had performance problems.

We previously tested Microsoft Azure Application Gateway with the WAF feature. However, two points led us to switch to Check Point:

1- We wanted a centralized security environment. We already have Check Point solutions based on the infinity checkpoint portal.

2- The WAF solution required more time in detection mode.

Costs are an important issue to discuss with the partner. Validate the documentation and its scope to validate if they meet corporate requirements.

We always evaluate the solutions in the market to make the best decision.

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is a one-stop unified solution for securing workloads and IT assets most efficiently. The Web Application Firewalls of this solution are designed in a most customizable and advanced manner, which suits different requirements in an effortless way.

Also, all APIs integrated with our IT system are completely prevented and secured by this product. It helps restrict malware attacks on our APIs and enables the blacking of any malware and phishing elements in the system.

One of the highly versatile and deployable products for any kind of IT security. 

CloudGuard Application Security strengthened the IT security of our organization. We faced lesser trouble in managing the endpoints and it went through quite smoothly. Also, the trial version of the solution is extremely beneficial and has enormous utility features to test the features before final deployment. My IT administrator understood the requirement well and also propose API integration with our internal cloud and server system.

The application security is an advanced product with high threat detection rates with full agility and also is a highly scalable solution for any organization. It takes less time to comprehend the features and their utilities are of paramount importance.

It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system.

Easy and effortless API integration of this application security tool with any other IT assets and software on-premise and cloud.

The solution is highly replicable across diverse IT environments. No problem or hassle faced in running the same.

Cost-effective application security product with high utility features available for testing in their trial version. It helps in making mindful buying decisions as per customer requirements.

Cost reduction and trial period extension should be considered with some lucrative discount offerings in buying standard versions. This will attract more and more new vendors and customers to partner and will be a win-win situation for all stakeholders involved.

Also, the IT security environment is dynamic and ever-evolving, with new developmental changes every now and then. We are customizing our needs and requirements for business mindfully, and this requires a lot of effort in immersing new and advanced features to enhance customer satisfaction.

Cloud Guard Application Security should attune their working and new developments in alignment with the business requirements in these changing environments.

I've used the solution for the past year now.

The solution has good stability and replicability.

It's a highly scalable solution.

Technical support is good.

Positive

We were using an in-house solution with few features and more of manual intervention. It was not very satisfactory.

The solution is an effortless go-to software tool for IT security.

We implemented via a vendor ONLY.

We've seen an ROI of over 70%.

We are at the inception phase but can undoubtedly recommend Cloud Guard Application Security solution for prospective organizations as the product is an advanced and customized solution with a high-performance rate in detecting malware and fewer false negatives.

A lot of options were chosen by the IT team before the final buy decision. We looked into McAfee, IBM, and other security solutions, which were examined, tried, and tested thoroughly.

They are offering fantastic IT security solutions and should keep evolving this way to keep up with the pace of IT security advancements in a recent technological era.

The importance and use of this product were required to improve new application deployments made in the Microsoft Azure cloud. They were not one hundred percent secure, however with this CloudGuard application security from Check Point has managed to improve all these requirements to obtain greater security.

The applications are generally internal to the company, however, they are secure thanks to Check Point CloudGuard.                                   

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is a cloud-based security solution designed to protect web applications and APIs from various types of cyber threats.

This tool has managed to improve security considerably in our apps and the APIs created for the company. We have not presented problems, threats, or leaks even when some are exposed to the Internet and are more susceptible to attacks. The company is now more secure, thanks to Check Point.                                             

The solution is created one hundred percent on the cloud; the portal is easy to manage.

The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time.

CloudGuard Application Security provides comprehensive visibility into web applications and API traffic

The solution offers support for compliance regulations such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR, helping organizations to meet their regulatory obligations.

One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support. It is always attended very late or they take a long time to answer.

The cost of this tool is extremely high, which is why it must be analyzed before implementing it.

The support language is only English. This causes some problems in Spanish-speaking countries. They could expand the languages offered to help the client.

This excellent security tool, Check Point CloudGuard, has multi-cloud security and is also perfect for secure developments. It's been used in recent years by the company.

Previously we did not use a technology like this.

We always carry out tests and validations before acquiring a solution.

We have had the need to ensure the development of each of our applications based on the fact that the applications must be safe, fast, and efficient. We want to prevent an injection of a vulnerability attack by broken authentication, exposure of confidential data, or external entities that can inject us with xml services via broken access control. All these characteristics cause insecurity. We have looked for solutions that can guide us and establish a safe and concise baseline.

It has given us greater security at an organizational level. It has allowed us to use components with known vulnerabilities, which have been prevented based on their multiple databases that have correlated incidents, helping the development of applications to be fast, efficient, and safe, which is what we were looking for. Thus giving us the possibility to register, monitor, and identify technological insufficiencies or absent capacities in the development of the application.

Its most outstanding feature is the registry and the possibility of monitoring everything. When it comes to simplifying or establishing an error, an infraction, or a detection due to a breach of unauthorized access, it gives us an overview of each one of the capabilities and a segmented control over the development. It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running. It's giving us the ability to test based on vulnerable interfaces, and anomalous requests and responses. All these types of characteristics give us a reference point as to whether they are secure or insecure. We get logging monitoring and general visibility of the application.

The application allows us to have control over its activities, the management, and the interconnection of monitoring which takes advantage of computing power, is exceptional. That said, I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter.

We've used the solution for about six or seven months. That was when established applications at the cloud level.

We had the need to protect the computers in the cloud that we were migrating, giving them greater security and having control over the events and tasks that they execute. 

This need led us to have and search for a solution that would support us directly with containers and the security of our access APIs. 

Above all, we needed something that would give us added value when implementing, and that was where we came to use Check Point AppSec. 

Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI.

With so many tasks that we have at the administration level, as administrators, we find this solution as one of the best recommendations due to its powerful AI. It supports us to be scalable and learn in management with the data it is learning. 

Zero-day management and preemptive stop management provide detection in hours, not weeks. These help us to be much more proactive and efficient in our security management and in much of what we have in the cloud and the infrastructure that we have been migrating to the various cloud.

Among its most outstanding features is the powerful AI in container security. Above all, it is one of the most powerful and easy-to-manage solutions. It manages to protect itself, and it manages to include its new rules based on what manages to learn. This helps us protect web applications and APIs by eliminating false positives and stops automated attacks against our organization. It eliminates the need to adjust rules manually and create exceptions each time an update is performed.

We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices. It would help us to be more portable with management from tablets, iPads, or some cell phones, becoming easier to administer. 

We'd lie to see it take on the characteristics of quantum applications and have these solutions all in one, protecting us and giving us even more value than what it is giving us today. 

I've used the solution for one year.

We did not previously use a different solution.

We did not evaluate other options.

I use the solution for securing web applications. 

The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy. 

Securing web applications with Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is easy. The setup and configuration are easy compared to alternatives. It stands out for its simplicity. It does not rely on signatures, one of its unique features. 

The solution helps to reduce TCO. It minimizes the pressure. 

I have encountered issues with Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's technical support. It also has missing configuration features. 

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's deployment is easy. 

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market. 

The tool protects newer applications. It isn't very good when dealing with both applications. However, it is expected. I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.