No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

11:11 Disaster Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

11:11 Disaster Recovery
Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Live Recovery
Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category, the mindshare of 11:11 Disaster Recovery is 5.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 9.4%, down from 24.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery as a Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
VMware Live Recovery9.4%
11:11 Disaster Recovery5.6%
Other85.0%
Disaster Recovery as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1221 - PeerSpot reviewer
Database Expert at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Excellent Rental Data Centres to simulate a DR (Disaster Recovery) operation .
SunGard provides DR (Disaster Recovery) services at it's data centers. The service is for companies who do not maintain their own dedicated DR sites and need to rent one to conduct a DR exercise for validating it's DR setup. These centers have state of the art equipment with all possible hardware options and one needs to define their specific requirements. Companies can rent their hardware cages at SunGard Site and have options to replicate their critical data at the DR site periodically. They can then simulate the DR exercise when desired. Additionally Tape restores are also possible at the DR site.
SuhailAkhtar - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd
Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement
For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"These centers have state of the art equipment with all possible hardware options and one needs to define their specific requirements."
"The stability is great, there are no bugs or glitches, it does not crash or freeze, and it is reliable."
"VMware SRM's most valuable features are its convenience and its use of stretched clusters."
"It was working very well with VMware since it's a VMware product."
"The UI is very user-friendly and testing is easy, it doesn't require a lot of resources or a SAN team to enable testing, a single person can do it and get results."
"It eliminates the need for complex compliance requirements, making it a highly effective solution."
"This product allows organizations to have a solid BC business continuity plan in place in case of disaster."
"We have had some customers that were hit with some random wear and we were able to restore the files from SRM with minimal downtime."
"If you create a proper primary recovery plan, you have good protection."
 

Cons

"This is a good service, however a costly one."
"Cost is definitely an area where the product could be improved, I'd definitely say it should have cheaper pricing."
"The licenses need to be easier to quote."
"It is impossible to acquire Datrium data nodes, unfortunately."
"Flexibility to choose different PITs would be nice."
"Sometimes it’s good, sometimes it’s bad. It’s just luck of the draw."
"The infrastructure of the solution needs to be more software-based"
"The pricing structure is pretty expensive, especially after the recent changes, and it's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production."
"VMware SRM lacks certain functions that other platforms have, such as better prioritization of allocation of resources and Boot profiles."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"VMware SRM is quite expensive."
"The pricing is good."
"The price could be lower, in general. My clients pay for an annual license."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
"It is about $3,000 a year for the 25 pack. The package gives you the ability to protect up to 25 virtual machines."
"Mature products like VMware SRM often have higher costs."
"The cost of SRM is on par with market rates."
"I rate the solution's pricing a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user159711 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 9, 2014
VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto
Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise41
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?
We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...
What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?
For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escala...
What is your primary use case for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?
We are the partner as well as the integrator, and we mostly work in the integration industry. Integration is our core business, but we also do partnership activities. Most of our projects are based...
 

Also Known As

Sungard Disaster Recovery Services
VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ullico Inc., Dakotacare
Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: May 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.