Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Dell Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Dell Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Dell Technologies holds a 4.1% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Read 15 Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines reviews

2,281 Views
2,053 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

5,329 Views
4,476 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and VMware Live Recovery are solutions in the virtualization recovery space. Dell RecoverPoint has an advantage in pricing and support, while VMware Live Recovery is favored for its feature set and value despite higher costs.

Features: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines delivers robust data protection, rapid recovery, and continuous replication, ensuring efficient recovery points. VMware Live Recovery focuses on high availability, instant recovery, and seamless integration with VMware environments, providing advanced features that stand out in VMware-centric setups.

Room for Improvement: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines could enhance its integration with non-VMware environments and improve advanced recovery features to compete better with feature-rich solutions. It may also benefit from refining its UI for easier navigation. VMware Live Recovery might improve its cost-effectiveness and simplify the deployment process for users outside the VMware ecosystem. Additionally, reducing the complexity of integration with third-party tools could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines offers a simpler deployment process backed by strong customer support, facilitating quick problem resolution. VMware Live Recovery's deployment is more complex but benefits from integration with VMware tools and strong technical support channels. Dell offers a user-friendly experience, while VMware provides advantages for existing VMware infrastructure users.

Pricing and ROI: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines presents a cost-effective setup with strong ROI potential through resource efficiency and low operational overheads. VMware Live Recovery requires higher initial investment but provides comprehensive features and compatibility with VMware ecosystems, offering significant long-term benefits despite upfront costs. Dell is more immediately cost-effective, whereas VMware delivers returns in advanced feature priority environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is 4.1%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 7.3%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.3%
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines	4.1%
Other	88.6%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Sofien SMIDA

Head of Data Center at National Center of Informatics

Simplifies snapshot recovery and improves compatibility challenges

The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX. Initially, making the two storage systems replicate was not an easy task. There was a splitting in the fiber switches at first. Then, the RPAs, which manage replication, would move the IO blocks to the second system. In the end, the two systems were not the same, which made it difficult to synchronize them. However, we succeeded in replicating smoothly with Oracle databases and Windows machines. When we acquired the VPLEX Virtual solutions, it became much easier. It was a piece of cake to do the replication between two VPLEX systems since they communicate in the same language.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable. We haven't experienced any kind of bug or glitch. We haven't experienced crashes."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to change IP addresses when failing a server over."

"It is a very simple tool to use and offers flexibility in using the tool for recovery and transitioning from one state to another."

"The generalization of the journals allows us to go back in time and choose the snapshot suitable for us. We can grab it as needed."

"The most valuable feature is that it is journal-based and you don't have to replicate a lot of data."

"The workload can be moved directly if the disaster site is the main site."

"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."

"Point-in-time recovery and ease of deployment are valuable."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros

"It's easy to use and the interface is quite simple."

"I would rate the ease of setting up and configuring my recovery plan in VMware SRM, a ten out of ten, with ten being the easiest."

"The replication is a key feature."

"The most valuable features are the backup and disaster recovery services."

"The product functionality is fairly high-quality."

"The replication is the solution's most valuable feature. If we have some issues on the VM in the main site we can migrate it to another site automatically."

"Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use."

"VMware Live Recovery is a very useful tool for live recovery."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"It should have features for recovering a group of virtual machines and full-scale security. For recovering all the VMs at once, they don't have a GUI option, and we have to use the command line."

"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."

"The solution currently supports only VMware."

"The configuration process seems a bit challenging, and the installation takes a bit longer than expected."

"It can have better integration. It would be good if, in addition to VMware VM, it can also support other hypervisors. I also want to see support for Oracle databases. As of now, it supports only SQL and Exchange. It would be good to also support other databases."

"I would like to see integration with EMC NetWorker in the next release."

"The solution's technical team has enough skills, but the process can get complicated with the time you get connected with the L3 support."

"I would like to have the HTML 5 interface working because it is currently not functioning with the VMware environment."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons

"VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery could improve by enhancing the network bandwidth from the storage."

"The solution is on the expensive side."

"I would like to see this solution be more scalable."

"The technical support is not very good and needs to make an effort to improve."

"What I think can be improved is the data replication aspect."

"The user experience could be more friendly."

"Currently, there is a limitation of consolidating only 15 sites per SRM."

"The configuration process could be improved."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."

"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."

"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."

"This is an expensive product."

"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."

"After Broadcom acquired the solution, the licensing cost increased drastically"

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."

"I would say VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is very expensive in comparison with other available virtualization solutions."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for VMware SRM, which is not very expensive."

"The cost of SRM is on par with market rates."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"The software is expensive. There is a one-time cost involved in purchasing the license."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

I was actually just having a quick look to compare some solutions, but we are going to stick with what we currently have, which is Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines ( /products/dell-recoverpoi...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Disaster Recovery Manager vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 24% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

January 2026

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines report

Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

January 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines enables quick recovery of VMware virtual machines and allows you to efficiently test, manage and orchestrate operational backup and disaster recovery operations.

With tight integration with VMware, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is storage and application agnostic, with built-in automation accessible via VMware vSphere web client plug-in.

When cloud becomes a vital part of your disaster recovery strategy, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is also web-enabled, providing efficient replication to AWS and VMware Cloud on AWS.

RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite.

Dell Technologies

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery

December 2025

Free Report: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.