Azure Site Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines comparison

Azure Site Recovery vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (3rd)

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

The time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites

It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"It is a very stable product and very scalable."

"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."

"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."

"You can create automation to move workloads and redirect traffic to another region."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"One of the standout features of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is its real-time data protection capability."

"RecoverPoint replicates workloads fast."

"Point-in-time recovery and ease of deployment are valuable."

"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."

"The most valuable features are the data center recovery administration and the time of recovery."

"It is a very simple tool to use and offers flexibility in using the tool for recovery and transitioning from one state to another."

"The generalization of the journals allows us to go back in time and choose the snapshot suitable for us. We can grab it as needed."

"It is a point-in-time restore, which is quite handy."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages."

"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."

"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."

"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."

"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."

"we lack a straightforward method to automate the restart of services, which can be quite time-consuming."

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"The solution's technical team has enough skills, but the process can get complicated with the time you get connected with the L3 support."

"The solution currently supports only VMware. There is increasing demand for compatibility with other hypervisors, such as Hyper V and KVM Proxmox. Additionally, licensing has become less flexible and more expensive."

"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's actually quite hard. If it could be simplified it might be better for the end user."

"The solution currently supports only VMware."

"In the next release of this software, I would like to see options that help to decrease the bandwidth required, such as compressing the data."

"Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover."

"I would like to have the HTML 5 interface working because it is currently not functioning with the VMware environment."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"They have a license to pay."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"This is an expensive product."

"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."

"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."

"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."

"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

One of the standout features of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is its real-time data protection capability.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.

What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover.

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

JetStream DR vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

VMware Live Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 39% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 29% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 17% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 4% of the time

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

Product Reports

Azure Site Recovery

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines report

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines enables quick recovery of VMware virtual machines and allows you to efficiently test, manage and orchestrate operational backup and disaster recovery operations.

With tight integration with VMware, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is storage and application agnostic, with built-in automation accessible via VMware vSphere web client plug-in.

When cloud becomes a vital part of your disaster recovery strategy, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is also web-enabled, providing efficient replication to AWS and VMware Cloud on AWS.

RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods

Azure Site Recovery vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines