ACCELQ Automate vs Eggplant Test comparison

ACCELQ and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. ACCELQ is ranked #21, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3. ACCELQ holds a 1.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACCELQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

ACCELQ Automate

Read 1 ACCELQ Automate review

876 Views
876 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,848 Views
2,617 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Eggplant Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	4.3%
ACCELQ Automate	1.5%
Other	94.2%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"Good text reading ability."

"It is easy to set up."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"The best feature of Eggplant Test is that it's very easy to use; you just capture those pictures of the objects in your application and it's easy to automate."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

More Eggplant Test pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"There was no free trial in it."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"It has low productivity."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

More Eggplant Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 18% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 10% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

March 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

ACCELQ

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.