

Acronis Cyber Protect and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery both offer robust disaster recovery solutions. Acronis Cyber Protect is noted for better pricing and support, while AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is favored for its comprehensive features.
Features: Acronis Cyber Protect users highlight integrated backup, anti-malware protection, and robust support. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its seamless integration with AWS services, automated disaster recovery, and advanced security features. AWS stands out with its extensive feature set and technical integration.
Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect needs enhancements in system resource usage, faster backup speeds, and improved scalability. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery requires better usability, simpler setup processes, and more detailed documentation. Both products have specific areas for refinement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, while more sophisticated, needs improvements in deployment simplicity and customer support responsiveness. Acronis leads in deployment simplicity and support.
Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect is generally cost-effective with a solid ROI. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is viewed as more expensive but justified by its feature set and performance. Acronis is favorable for budget-conscious users, while AWS offers a stronger ROI for those investing in extensive capabilities.
My customers see value in money and ROI with Acronis Cyber Protect, so they purchase it.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
Whenever I have a question, they respond very quickly each time.
I'll give them a nine for how responsive they are in technical support.
The support takes too much time to respond to callbacks.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
Acronis Cyber Protect is a scalable product.
I would rate it eight on a scale from 1 to 10 for scalability, considering it will be multiple assets.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It ended up being at a point where we actually had to disable some features in order for the client to work through that specific purpose.
The stability of Acronis Cyber Protect is very high.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
We are not very comfortable with cloud-based solutions at this time. We are looking for products which are entirely on-premises, so they remain within our control.
It's only after we discovered there was a compatibility issue with the application that the client was running that we actually had to do a lot of log file shipping to Acronis themselves and getting solutions because of other problems.
Having something such as a community for peer-to-peer interaction would be a valuable asset.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
I would rate the price as nine out of ten.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
The biggest benefit of Acronis Cyber Protect for my customers is that it is a great asset to protect business data and ensure data is in a secure Vault.
The NASDAQ level CFS level backup is the feature I find most beneficial for our data protection strategy.
This is beneficial because any backup package stored in the cloud is not free, and if it shrinks well, it allows users to pay less for cloud storage.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Acronis Cyber Protect | 2.4% |
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 68 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.