Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Action1 vs Automox comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Action1
Ranking in Patch Management
28th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Automox
Ranking in Patch Management
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (36th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Action1 is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Automox is 2.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Automox2.2%
Action11.6%
Other96.2%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Action1?
Leave a review
Raphael Tiji - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead
Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
8%
Government
8%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Automox?
Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.
What is your primary use case for Automox?
Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...
What advice do you have for others considering Automox?
Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Acme Corporation 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. ATT 5. Bank of America 6. Cisco Systems 7. CocaCola Company 8. Dell Technologies 9.Disney 10. eBay 11. FedEx 12. Ford Motor Company 13. Google 14. HP 15. IBM 16. Intel Corporation 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Kraft Heinz 19. McDonalds 20. Microsoft 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PepsiCo 24. Procter Gamble 25. Samsung 26. Target Corporation 27. Tesla 28. Toyota 29. Visa 30. Walmart 31. WeWork
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Vicarius and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.