Acunetix vs Digital.ai Application Security comparison

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

"Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

"Currently only supports web scanning."

"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."