Acunetix vs Digital.ai Application Security comparison

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"It generates automated reports."

"Acunetix has saved me a lot of time in security checks and automating security testing with the workflow without adding too much complexity."

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"I think currently on full scans of large apps, Acunetix takes time, so it can improve the timing part."

"I think Acunetix needs improvement since it is now working with Invicti, so the price list will need to be reconsidered."

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The solution is expensive."