Amazon API Gateway vs SwaggerHub comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 12.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Amazon API Gateway

Read 46 Amazon API Gateway reviews

11,385 Views
11,385 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 13 SwaggerHub reviews

1,522 Views
1,522 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon API Gateway

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Amazon API Gateway and SwaggerHub cater to developers managing API lifecycles. Amazon API Gateway offers a competitive advantage in scalability and performance, ideal for enterprises needing robust AWS integration. SwaggerHub is preferred for its superior documentation and design features, appealing to design-focused teams.

Features: Amazon API Gateway supports custom domain names, provides advanced security controls, and robust analytics, enhancing large-scale API management. SwaggerHub offers a collaborative platform with API documentation, versioning, and integration with design tools, making the API design process streamlined and effective.

Room for Improvement: Amazon API Gateway could benefit from clearer documentation and simpler initial setup processes. Adding more intuitive user interfaces would also enhance its usability. Enhancing non-AWS service integrations could broaden its appeal. SwaggerHub's performance could improve under heavy load conditions, and there could be more detailed guides for advanced features. Expanding its integration capabilities beyond design tools could increase its utility for broader projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon API Gateway integrates seamlessly with the AWS suite, facilitating deployment for AWS users and backed by comprehensive global support. SwaggerHub is praised for its straightforward setup process and is supported by an engaging community that aids in smooth deployment across various API tools, providing intuitive user assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon API Gateway utilizes a pay-as-you-go model, offering high ROI for large-scale needs and fluctuating traffic, although cost-effectiveness varies with usage. SwaggerHub's tiered pricing caters to feature-based needs, allowing predictable budgeting for design-centric teams, emphasizing cost-effectiveness for stable design investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon API Gateway

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Amazon API Gateway is 12.1%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon API Gateway	12.1%
SwaggerHub	1.5%
Other	86.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Pradeep Tamanar

Architect at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.

Strong technical support and effective toolset improve workflow but setup process requires refinement

I have experience with Nintex and K2, but I do not have experience with Unqork. I am specialized in Microsoft products such as Power Automate and Power Apps. I have knowledge of Microsoft Intune and Defender, along with certain Azure components. I work for an organization as a presales architect, proposing solutions to customers. I am familiar with Microsoft Defender for Identity, for Business, and for IoT, though I haven't worked extensively on that. I have a conceptually good understanding of it. I'm mostly working on Microsoft collaboration tools, which include SharePoint and Power Platform tools. I have been dealing mostly with Microsoft, but also with other vendors. Regarding database services, we typically use SQL server services. We have not used Amazon RDS; typically, we use PostgreSQL or MySQL. On the Azure side, I work with Azure Database services including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Cosmos. I was previously working as an architect for U3Soft and am currently working with Birlasoft (B I R L A S O F T). My overall rating for Amazon API Gateway is 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Has streamlined API documentation and integration workflows across cross-functional teams

Documenting SwaggerHub has a standard and consistent structure of API definitions, and it automatically generates interactive documentation which helps the developers to understand everything. There are certain areas where SwaggerHub can go beyond here as formatting options for documentation pages are restricted, and the import and export options of API collections are complex in SwaggerHub. It provides various collaboration tools where we can work and do it. The strong validation against the API maintains conformity and reduces errors. That part is very great in SwaggerHub. Overall, scalability and stability-wise, it varies high compared to the competitors, but there are still certain areas where competitors are providing various customizations. SwaggerHub can understand those aspects and implement them as well. The complex import and export of API calls and collaborations can be challenging in SwaggerHub. If they can make it easier for us, that would be great. Their performance is degraded if there is too much load on the API. The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub. A few of my teammates have complained that they find the UI unintuitive where it requires multiple clicks for simple tasks. SwaggerHub is a great tool, but these limitations can be addressed to make things better and easier.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable."

"The best features of Amazon API Gateway include security and metering, which involves the analytical part of how the APIs are being consumed since it's for consumer APIs built for use by other applications."

"A most valuable feature of Amazon API Gateway is how quickly we can connect to backend services and have APIs accessible from anywhere."

"Amazon API Gateway facilitates our serverless architecture, particularly with Lambda, by allowing us to perform various tasks. For instance, Lambda functions authorize API calls, execute multiple workloads, and integrate with other services like Azure and Kubernetes. Additionally, we leverage Lambda functions behind the Amazon API Gateway to query databases, process data, and interact with different systems."

"The most valuable feature is it has lots of integration."

"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."

"It provides the flexibility to configure, switch, and manage configurations through cloud permissions or performance settings."

"The initial setup is pretty easy. Deployment only takes five minutes."

More Amazon API Gateway pros

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"SwaggerHub is helping with team collaboration, as all the people now know the link, they just go there and get the information they need, and it is really a documentation tool for sharing documentation information about the API we support."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"SwaggerHub has significantly improved how my organization designs, documents, and manages APIs, centralizing API management so that all API definitions are stored in one location, which makes it easy for stakeholders, developers, QA, DevOps, and products to access the latest version."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"The scalability is endless."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"An audit trail and audit stamps managed at the API level to control API movement would be beneficial."

"The pricing could be improved. In cases where customers require real-time sync or real-time calling groups with IoT, the volume of data and time lag become a concern."

"Currently, I'm not facing any issues with Amazon API Gateway, which satisfies my requirements. I'm pretty happy with what Amazon API Gateway offers, but as its pricing is on the higher side, that's one area for improvement in the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon API Gateway is an improvement in the status checks you get from the monitoring feature of the solution. Currently, you get the number of requests received, the number of reports, etc., but if there are more details than what's given by Amazon API Gateway, that will improve the solution."

"They could include more support tools in the product."

"From a use cases perspective, you need to have an internal and external gateway. AWS can only handle external traffic so has to be used together with another solution."

"The integration could be improved."

"Like most Amazon services, and this one's the same, you're expected to effectively do your own support, and any other support is by emails, so it's quite limited."

More Amazon API Gateway cons

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price and ten means high price."

"It is somewhat costly, particularly when it introduces server-related features, which are often scheduled on our end."

"I rate the platform's pricing a five out of ten."

"Since it's a serverless solution, Amazon API Gateway is not so expensive."

"We use all open-source technology."

"Fees are volume-based."

"It's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased."

"Amazon API Gateway has various pricing plans, but I cannot give the exact cost, though I can say that it's expensive. On a scale of one to five, I'd rate the pricing for Amazon API Gateway as two, as the solution is one of the most expensive products in the market for API management."

More Amazon API Gateway pricing and cost advice

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

In SwaggerHub, I appreciate that it is a powerful platform for API design and collaboration, but currently, the access control is somewhat limited. I would love to see enhanced permissions allowing...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I have worked for Arden University, University of Sheffield, and Nanyang Technological University. For those institutions, I used Amazon AppStream for backend validations. When working for Prolific...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SwaggerHub?

Based on my limited experience with SwaggerHub, I can share a few practical recommendations for implementing it effectively. Before onboarding multiple teams, it's important to define naming conven...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 74% of the time

Apigee vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon API Gateway Competitors

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 10% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

3scale API Management vs SwaggerHub

Compared 3% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway

February 2026

Download Amazon API Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub

January 2026

Download SwaggerHub product report

Overview

Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.

Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.

What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?

Ease of Use: Provides a straightforward way to set up and manage APIs.
Scalability: Handles growing API demands effectively.
Integration: Seamless connection with AWS services.
Security: Implements authentication and authorization measures.
Serverless Architecture: Manages costs efficiently with AWS Lambda.
Traffic Management: Supports rate limiting and traffic controls.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Cost Management: Reduces expenses with serverless options.
Efficient Connectivity: Rapidly links backend services.
Enhanced Security: Safeguards API interactions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse API configurations.
API Accessibility: Facilitates external service exposure.

Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub

February 2026

Free Report: Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.