Amazon API Gateway vs SwaggerHub comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 9.8% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Amazon API Gateway

Read 45 Amazon API Gateway reviews

12,223 Views
12,223 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 15 SwaggerHub reviews

2,447 Views
2,447 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Amazon API Gateway

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Amazon API Gateway and SwaggerHub cater to developers managing API lifecycles. Amazon API Gateway offers a competitive advantage in scalability and performance, ideal for enterprises needing robust AWS integration. SwaggerHub is preferred for its superior documentation and design features, appealing to design-focused teams.

Features: Amazon API Gateway supports custom domain names, provides advanced security controls, and robust analytics, enhancing large-scale API management. SwaggerHub offers a collaborative platform with API documentation, versioning, and integration with design tools, making the API design process streamlined and effective.

Room for Improvement: Amazon API Gateway could benefit from clearer documentation and simpler initial setup processes. Adding more intuitive user interfaces would also enhance its usability. Enhancing non-AWS service integrations could broaden its appeal. SwaggerHub's performance could improve under heavy load conditions, and there could be more detailed guides for advanced features. Expanding its integration capabilities beyond design tools could increase its utility for broader projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon API Gateway integrates seamlessly with the AWS suite, facilitating deployment for AWS users and backed by comprehensive global support. SwaggerHub is praised for its straightforward setup process and is supported by an engaging community that aids in smooth deployment across various API tools, providing intuitive user assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon API Gateway utilizes a pay-as-you-go model, offering high ROI for large-scale needs and fluctuating traffic, although cost-effectiveness varies with usage. SwaggerHub's tiered pricing caters to feature-based needs, allowing predictable budgeting for design-centric teams, emphasizing cost-effectiveness for stable design investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon API Gateway

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Amazon API Gateway is 9.8%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon API Gateway	9.8%
SwaggerHub	1.7%
Other	88.5%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Subrata Maity

Head - Engineering ,Technology and Enterprise Architecture at a tech consulting company with 201-500 employees

Faced challenges with audit trails and seek better user-level monitoring and control

Regarding built-in authorization, monitoring is quite substantial, and versioning systems is also what we are using. With Amazon API Gateway, we utilize a variety of deployment methods and services they provide, so monitoring services are the important parameter in API control from our side, allowing us to see how the APIs behave and how well they pick up the data from their respective sources. Integration with AWS Lambda has been beneficial since we have event controllers that help identify the APIs, which then call the API from the API services. We're managing this with events that are parameterized through API identification, mostly using Python in Lambda, which has inbuilt features to track API lifecycle parameters. The defined parameterized features in Amazon API Gateway help streamline API lifecycle management. Our AWS system admin team sets these configurations for us. The versioning number gets updated as we deploy revised API versions, which gets monitored on the API monitoring services. The cloud engineering team assists us as we are from a solutions development and deployment team. The importance of Amazon API Gateway's global API deployment for our application's performance is significant in terms of scalability and availability. Amazon API Gateway services have been very good, maintaining a 99.99 SLA, providing us confidence in the global deployment level as it is capable of handling various endpoint types, such as database sites and legacy systems.

Read full review

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Has streamlined API documentation and integration workflows across cross-functional teams

Documenting SwaggerHub has a standard and consistent structure of API definitions, and it automatically generates interactive documentation which helps the developers to understand everything. There are certain areas where SwaggerHub can go beyond here as formatting options for documentation pages are restricted, and the import and export options of API collections are complex in SwaggerHub. It provides various collaboration tools where we can work and do it. The strong validation against the API maintains conformity and reduces errors. That part is very great in SwaggerHub. Overall, scalability and stability-wise, it varies high compared to the competitors, but there are still certain areas where competitors are providing various customizations. SwaggerHub can understand those aspects and implement them as well. The complex import and export of API calls and collaborations can be challenging in SwaggerHub. If they can make it easier for us, that would be great. Their performance is degraded if there is too much load on the API. The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub. A few of my teammates have complained that they find the UI unintuitive where it requires multiple clicks for simple tasks. SwaggerHub is a great tool, but these limitations can be addressed to make things better and easier.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is very strong, and we've had issues with the solution and configuration and we've gotten very good support."

"This solution gives you a unified way to have your API accessed."

"We would definitely recommend sticking to native solutions because then you have one Hyperscale provider supporting the applications, storage, compute, and APIs."

"Integrating API Gateway with other AWS services was easy. It worked out of the box, so it worked perfectly."

"The scalability is very good."

"It is a stable solution."

"It's flexible. It was valuable."

"In terms of the most valuable features, I would say that it is really easy to start working with it."

More Amazon API Gateway pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"Normally, they publish their APIs on SwaggerHub for seamless integration with SmartBear and ReadyAPI, which allows us to perform detailed end-to-end automation testing."

"Since I started using SwaggerHub, it has had a positive impact on our organization due to better collaboration between developers and the quality assurance team, and it has reduced errors because of its automated validation."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"It is a stable solution."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"The scalability is endless."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"One of the problems with using this solution is that you have to know a lot about the Amazon ecosystem, in terms of services, to be able to use it."

"The way they manage the headers could be improved and made easier."

"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."

"Amazon API Gateway will wait for only 30 seconds to get a response from other services, such as the Lambda function."

"When working with XML payloads, there can be issues due to the lack of a seamless connection between API Gateway and Lambda functions."

"There should be more videos and documentation about the new features that are released every month."

"I'm pretty happy with what Amazon API Gateway offers, but as its pricing is on the higher side, that's one area for improvement in the solution."

"There are features lacking in API Gateway, such as the timeout settings, which currently are set at 29 seconds."

More Amazon API Gateway cons

"In SwaggerHub, I appreciate that it is a powerful platform for API design and collaboration, but currently, the access control is somewhat limited."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub."

"One of the most difficult things about SwaggerHub is the user interface and its usability, as it can feel quite complex and require too many clicks for simple actions."

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The product is a little expensive."

"There is an annual licensing cost to use Amazon API Gateway."

"The solution is expensive. Though the product was previously available at a cheap rate, nowadays it is expensive."

"The pricing model for API Gateway is advantageous due to its serverless nature, as it depends on traffic volume."

"Fees are volume-based."

"Since it's a serverless solution, Amazon API Gateway is not so expensive."

More Amazon API Gateway pricing and cost advice

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

"The tool is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

SwaggerHub can be improved since the API testing features are limited compared to Postman, and it is somewhat expensive for small teams as paid plans cost a lot.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

My main use case for SwaggerHub is to design and review API specifications, as I test endpoints with the help of Swagger UI, validate the request and the response schemas, and share the API documen...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SwaggerHub?

Before using SwaggerHub, I advise having basic API knowledge, as those with API knowledge can easily use SwaggerHub. I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 70% of the time

Apigee vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon API Gateway Competitors

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 9% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 7% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

Stoplight vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway

June 2026

Download Amazon API Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub

May 2026

Download SwaggerHub product report

Overview

Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.

Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.

What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?

Ease of Use: Provides a straightforward way to set up and manage APIs.
Scalability: Handles growing API demands effectively.
Integration: Seamless connection with AWS services.
Security: Implements authentication and authorization measures.
Serverless Architecture: Manages costs efficiently with AWS Lambda.
Traffic Management: Supports rate limiting and traffic controls.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Cost Management: Reduces expenses with serverless options.
Efficient Connectivity: Rapidly links backend services.
Enhanced Security: Safeguards API interactions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse API configurations.
API Accessibility: Facilitates external service exposure.

Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SwaggerHub streamlines API management with features like centralized management and real-time collaboration, enhancing team efficiency. Its user-friendly interface facilitates API design and testing, offering seamless integration with third-party tools for enhanced teamwork.

SwaggerHub provides centralized API definitions enabling easy access and reducing manual errors, which accelerates development. Its role-based access and versioning foster better communication and control among teams. While improvements could enhance Azure, GCP integrations, and CI/CD pipeline connectivity, users note a currently limited UI scalability and restricted customization, especially in developer portals. API tagging, OpenAPI 3.1 support, and permissions enhancements are requested, alongside addressing stability under heavy loads and streamlining import/export processes. Competitive pricing is a concern for smaller teams, who find fewer features compared to competitors like Postman. Primarily used for API publishing, documentation, and testing, SwaggerHub integrates with SmartBear ReadyAPI for validation, supporting team collaboration through interactive documentation. It aids in client SDK generation and version control while facilitating automated testing and secure API management.

What features does SwaggerHub offer?

Centralized API Management: Enhances access and reduces errors
Real-Time Collaboration: Boosts team efficiency
Automated Validations: Improves API design accuracy
Seamless Third-Party Integration: Facilitates teamwork
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API handling

What benefits should be considered?

Enhanced Collaboration: Teams can work effectively with centralized access
Improved Efficiency: Reduces errors and accelerates development
Better Control: Role-based access and versioning enhance team management
Integration Capabilities: Connects smoothly with other tools

In industries using SwaggerHub, teams benefit from its centralized approach to API management, ensuring standardized documentation and testing practices. It supports seamless collaboration across departments, streamlining processes for industries heavily reliant on API services like finance, healthcare, and technology.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub

June 2026

Free Report: Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon API Gateway vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.