Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 in CS , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 3.0% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #15 in PCSS , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Read 18 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews

9,468 Views
2,083 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 12 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

2,059 Views
2,018 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Amazon Web Services (AWS), CTERA and others in Cloud Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (13th), File and Object Storage (17th)

Oracle Database Backup Service

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Public Cloud Storage Services (15th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, down 4.4% compared to last year.
Oracle Database Backup Service, on the other hand, focuses on Public Cloud Storage Services, holds 3.1% mindshare, up 1.4% since last year.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)	3.0%
Dropbox Business - Enterprise	6.5%
Box - Intelligent Content Management	4.8%
Other	85.7%

Cloud Storage

Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Database Backup Service	3.1%
Amazon S3	14.0%
Amazon S3 Glacier	11.3%
Other	71.6%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

reviewer2784675

Sr. Technical Account Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Serverless file storage has simplified multi-tenant Linux workloads and supports effortless growth

When I started working with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), I faced a few issues. One issue was around the number of IOPS limitation. Initially, the number of IOPS that could be performed on the Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) file system was quite low. Later on, it has been increased, and now I believe it is at a level where only very specific workloads might not perform optimally, but otherwise everything should work smoothly. By the time I was there, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) was supporting NFS version 4.1, not 4.2. Currently, it is supported up to NFS 4.1. A notable limitation of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is that it does not support Windows. If your workload is running on a Linux operating system and you do not want to manage it or even understand NFS at all, you should still be able to use it fairly quickly. There are scenarios where Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) might not work effectively. For example, database-type workloads do not run properly on Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) because at the end of the day, it is a network file system and requests must travel from one place to another and then return. This process takes time, so if you are running a database-type workload, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) might not be the right approach, and you would need to look elsewhere.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Achieve high availability and security with automated tasks over a decade

While there are some disadvantages in this product, from my experience with basic use cases, daily tasks, integration, scheduling, saving, and encryption, I have not encountered significant areas for improvement. However, the addition of a GUI configuration management and administration console for all administrative tasks would be highly beneficial. It would be preferable to have the ability to perform all console, terminal, and command line operations through a GUI interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automatic scaling functionality has helped manage fluctuating workloads because when we have 10 gigs of data and a customer needs to put even 10 times the data, no action is required as it will grow automatically."

"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."

"We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage."

"The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage."

"We haven't seen any downtime or challenges when using the services."

"The productivity of the customer has improved by around 30% by using Amazon EFS instead of a unique EC2 NFS instance."

"There are huge money savings, as we can save more than half of our costs."

"The platform is highly scalable."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) pros

"The interface is good."

"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"We've definitely seen an ROI despite this being an expensive solution."

"I am satisfied with the licensing policy and pricing of this product."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is stable and offers high availability, and the commands for restoration and backup processes are not complicated."

"I like the stability and the scalability of this product."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"Their response was not prompt, and it took them a while to figure out solutions. While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week."

"EFS could be improved by including a one-click setup."

"The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS."

"The initial setup requires prior experience and technical skills."

"Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS."

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3."

"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) cons

"The installation process is easy for me because I have performed this action hundreds of times. However, it is important to note that beginners and even some senior professionals may encounter significant difficulties during installation."

"We cannot use the product with other brands."

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."

"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

"I have been working with Oracle Database Backup Service for five years, and it has already been quite an expensive and extensive experience."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."

"The solution needs to add an archive function."

"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."

"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."

"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."

"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

"The platform is expensive."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"The platform is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

We don't need to purchase it; we are just using it and paying Amazon as per the utilization. We make direct payments to Amazon based on our usage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Oracle Database Backup Service is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

There could be room for improvement regarding Oracle Database Backup Service, from the dashboard to pricing.I would like to see more AI, better customization, and additional features in future upda...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Integration of Oracle Database Backup Service usually takes just a few hours.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 56% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 28% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Blob Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 2% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

October 2026

Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database Backup Service

October 2026

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Overview

Amazon EFS provides elastic file storage in the cloud, offering unlimited storage and seamless integration with AWS services for dynamic workloads.

Amazon EFS serves as a scalable, shareable file storage across Linux servers, seamlessly integrating with AWS for data-intensive applications. Its auto-scaling capability handles shifting data demands in real time, ensuring cost-effective storage management. Offering high availability and support for NFS version 4, Amazon EFS optimizes performance and data integrity for cloud and serverless environments. While its strengths lie in scalability and Linux support, further enhancements in cost transparency, Windows compatibility, and deployment simplicity can broaden its applicability.

What are the key features of Amazon EFS?

Flexible Scaling: Automatically adjusts storage capacity to meet dynamic workload demands.
Usage-based Pricing: Only charges for storage used, optimizing cost efficiency.
Integration with AWS: Seamlessly connects with services like EC2 for enhanced application support.
Auto-scaling: Efficiently allocates resources for fluctuating data needs.
Shared Access: Facilitates collaborative data use across various applications.

What benefits should users expect from Amazon EFS reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined configuration and easy scaling of resources.
Cost Management: Reduced storage expenses through usage-based pricing.
Reliable Performance: Consistent data availability and stable system operations.
Improved Data Management: Simplified processes for handling extensive datasets.
Integration Capabilities: Smooth interoperability with AWS services enhances functionality.

Amazon EFS is widely implemented in industries needing robust cloud-based storage solutions, facilitating scalable storage for applications like web serving, content management, and data analytics. Its compatibility with EC2 and Linux optimizes resource management, supporting complex access needs and enhancing operational efficiency in technology-focused sectors.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Database Backup Service offers secure, scalable, and performance-optimized backup solutions. Its seamless integration and high availability features make it ideal for medium and large businesses managing extensive data volumes.

This service provides features like automated scheduling and recovery assurance, ensuring cost-efficiency and compliance for businesses. Reliable encrypted backups and an intuitive dashboard-driven interface enhance usability. Users can benefit from point-in-time recovery and robust integration capabilities, making it a dependable choice for data protection and recovery strategies.

What Are Key Features of Oracle Database Backup Service?

Differential and Cumulative Backup: Allows specific parts of the database to be backed up efficiently, saving time and storage space.
Automated Scheduling: Reduces operational costs by streamlining backup processes through automation.
Recovery Assurance: Comprehensive tools for reliable data recovery, safeguarding data.
Encrypted Backups: Ensures data security during storage and transmission.
Dashboard-Driven Interface: Simplifies management and monitoring through a user-friendly dashboard.
High Availability: Guarantees continuous data access and minimizes downtime.

What Benefits Should Users Expect from Reviews?

Cost Reduction: Significant savings from automated processes and optimized use of resources.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to industry regulations, reducing risks.
Security: Strong encryption and authentication methods protect sensitive information.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing business needs and data volumes.
Performance Tuning: Delivers optimized backup and recovery operations.

Oracle Database Backup Service is widely implemented in sectors such as banking and finance, where data reliability and security are paramount. Businesses utilize it for managing various types of backups, enabling efficient integration with SAP workloads. It plays a crucial role in ensuring business continuity and effective disaster recovery strategies, providing backend support that facilitates smooth project execution and server recovery.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Amazon Web Services (AWS), CTERA and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.