Amazon Inspector vs RSA Archer comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and RSA are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while RSA is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.3% mindshare in IVRM, compared to RSA’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Amazon Inspector

Read 9 Amazon Inspector reviews

3,634 Views
327 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

RSA Archer

Read 42 RSA Archer reviews

7,279 Views
2,693 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon Inspector

RSA Archer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Archer and Amazon Inspector are products in the risk management and security assessment category. Amazon Inspector has an upper hand in automation and integration, while RSA Archer is favored for its compliance features.

Features: RSA Archer emphasizes risk management, compliance tracking, and incident response. It provides comprehensive governance frameworks and inbuilt modules like issue management and policy exception management. Amazon Inspector focuses on continuous monitoring with automated security assessments, seamless AWS integration, and vulnerability management.

Room for Improvement: RSA Archer could enhance usability by simplifying its setup process and customization options. Its user interface, although comprehensive, can benefit from more intuitive navigation. Amazon Inspector would improve by adding support for custom compliance rules. Expanding beyond AWS-centric environments could enhance its applicability and market reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Inspector excels in deployment within AWS environments, offering robust support through AWS services. This makes it ideal for businesses using AWS. RSA Archer is versatile but may need more time for deployment due to complexity, and its support leans more on consultancy services.

Pricing and ROI: RSA Archer generally involves higher initial costs because of customization necessities, offering significant ROI for enterprises with detailed risk management needs. Amazon Inspector has a scalable pricing model aligned with cloud usage, potentially delivering quicker ROI for businesses concentrating on cloud security assessments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Inspector vs. RSA Archer Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. RSA Archer

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (25th)

RSA Archer

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (1st), IT Governance (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 7.1%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
RSA Archer	7.1%
Amazon Inspector	1.3%
Other	91.6%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Abdalla Kenawy

AWS DevOps SRE/Infrastructure Engineer at Capgemini

Automated insights streamline data security assessment

For Amazon Inspector, we have many EC2 or virtual machines deployed inside our AWS environment, and the problem is that the existing package deployed inside this EC2 instance has already outdated packages. As we progress with time, this package needs to be updated for security enhancement, which requires us to uninstall the package, install the new version, and then we should be fine. However, the challenge comes with how to scan all our EC2 instances for security vulnerabilities, which is currently managed by Amazon Inspector. Amazon Inspector can scan EC2 instances or ECR, which is the ECR registry where we can save artifacts Docker images. Amazon Inspector can also scan Docker images uploaded to ECR for Elastic Registry service, and it can scan databases and S3 based on the latest updates. I noticed this from a couple of months ago, and it provides huge benefits for security. Regarding the best features of Amazon Inspector, it gives us a list of all existing outdated packages as part of a deployed package on EC2 instances or specific Python packages that are part of the Docker file and the Docker image itself, which are causing security concerns. Amazon Inspector can list these security concerns and offer guidance on how we can remediate it by updating the package to a specific upper version or something similar.

Read full review

Celda Juby

Information Security Specialist at Dubai Health Authority

Centralized management strengthens compliance with good look and feel

From my perspective as a customer and end user, Archer has an impressive look and feel, but the most adaptive feature is its ease of configuration which helps to enhance our process according to our maturity. It's more about our organization getting centralized with an integrated approach that focuses on risk governance and compliance. When can provide a detailed dashboards to management with the details of risks from top-down or bottom-up prioritizing actions based on its criticality or necessity. This allows us to show end users and management where the issues lie and effectively demonstrate accountability and visibility in compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is scanning the whole repository for any sort of vulnerabilities, so it allows us to be more confident in our DevSecOps and not put a lot of folks or attention to it."

"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option."

"Amazon Inspector is highly stable, rated ten out of ten, and this stability impacts business security and administration positively."

"It operates continuously, so as soon as resources are created, it scans them for vulnerabilities."

"My experience with AWS technical support is very good, I didn't face any specific challenges, and even the documentation of AWS is good for both Microsoft, which is Azure, and AWS."

"I recommend Amazon Inspector because it allows the automation of processes and requires less manual monitoring."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function."

"The assessment reports provided by Amazon Inspector have helped me in identifying security vulnerabilities in my cloud applications by giving us a nicely designed dashboard that provides all the security information we need to work on remediation."

More Amazon Inspector pros

"Archer allows us to define the progress of the organization's processes and helps build the right cyclic process and improve the current structure."

"It is easy to implement, it is easy to change the workflow, and it is easy to customize the processes."

"Risk management is one of the most impressive features of Archer, especially with the recent restructuring of the user interface."

"The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities."

"I have found all the features to be valuable, including those involving reporting, the dashboard, notifications, email modules, the database and data input."

"The helpful features of RSA Archer include providing an integrated overview of the landscape in the company, which leads the user to use the same inventory and other components, sharing the same set of references and objects we are working on."

"From my perspective as a customer and end user, RSA is about the look and feel."

"This is a good solution compared to others in the market because it is more secure."

More RSA Archer pros

Cons

"It has automated vulnerability assessment, yet I seek more flexibility in defining custom vulnerability checks tailored to my needs, which is more difficult."

"There are challenges associated with the interdependencies in AWS services, like requiring an Active Directory for other services, resulting in additional charges."

"The most challenging aspect I faced with Amazon Inspector during integration was automating the remediation process."

"There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The other point is that the reporting features of Inspector need improvement. For example, I am in an organization with millions of CVEs, and getting an overview of all this is challenging."

"It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents."

"One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect."

"The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a little high, and it is not covering all different applications and scanning."

More Amazon Inspector cons

"We've noticed recently with the advanced workflow jobs that we're receiving some errors. It's a showstopper for us and it's clear that some kind of development support is needed."

"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."

"The management agrees that Archer lacks in terms of presentation and dashboarding. It is complex, not user-friendly, and bulky."

"GUI could be improved."

"Compared to other GRC tools, RSA Archer is a little complex in the sense that even users need to have some knowledge of the tool."

"The product is expensive."

"The ticket handling process could be improved."

"I find the tech support to be inadequately knowledgeable."

More RSA Archer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's priced according to market standards for its services."

"The pricing is very transparent and clear."

"It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."

"The lowest cost would be around $10 for a few small accounts, however, for thousands of accounts, it could be around $5000 to $6000 dollars per month."

"The solution’s pricing is moderate."

"I am not sure about other companies, but it's quite expensive."

"At the higher end of the price scale, but provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products."

"RSA Archer's price is justifiable and not as expensive, compared to ServiceNow. I have heard that the licensing for ServiceNow is much more expensive. I'm unaware whether there are any additional costs after licensing fees."

"The license is costly for the solution, but the remaining set up and maintenance is quite cheaper."

"The pricing is okay. The licensing costs are very reasonable; it is very affordable to us."

"As I am a developer and responsible for providing production support, I do not have personal knowledge of the pricing. However, my colleagues claim that it is very expensive in comparison with other tools."

"It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing."

More RSA Archer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?

I am not honestly sure about the pricing side of Amazon Inspector, but that is taken care of by a separate team. I believe it's cheaper than the other third-party solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?

They might launch support for third-party environments in the next version regarding the best features in Amazon Inspector from my perspective. The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a litt...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Inspector?

I mostly use Amazon Inspector for vulnerability scanning on AWS native applications. For hybrid applications, we have different security scanners.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Archer?

While it provides benefits in terms of security, the pricing is a bit higher than customers typically expect. It would be helpful if RSA Archer had the capability for two-way integration because, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?

Regarding the compliance, risk, and governance tools, I am comfortable discussing the tools in the GRC category. The specific module from ServiceNow is the ServiceNow Compliance, Risk, and Governan...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Archer?

I have been in touch with about three companies who use RSA Archer actively in the compliance area. These companies use RSA Archer for nearly all purposes, including governance, internal risk, and ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon Inspector Competitors

MetricStream vs RSA Archer

Compared 6% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs RSA Archer

Compared 6% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs RSA Archer

Compared 5% of the time

AuditBoard vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

LogicManager vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA Archer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector

June 2026

Download Amazon Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Archer

June 2026

Download RSA Archer product report

Also Known As

No data available

Archer

Overview

Amazon Inspector offers automated vulnerability detection, scanning AWS workloads and recommending remediation, ensuring enhanced security without constant supervision.

Amazon Inspector provides advanced automated vulnerability assessments, specifically designed for AWS environments. It scans EC2 instances, ECR, and container images for vulnerabilities, ranking them by priority. With capabilities like integration with CloudTrail and CloudWatch, adherence to compliance benchmarks, and a comprehensive view for diverse resources, it supports continuous detection and detailed reporting. Users can schedule regular scans, maintaining strong security oversight. Current feedback highlights a need for improved scanning of EBS, S3, and EFS, as well as expanded databases and better patch integration.

What features make Amazon Inspector stand out?

Automated Vulnerability Assessments: Detects and prioritizes vulnerabilities in AWS workloads.
Continuous Detection: Keeps an eye on EC2, ECR, and container images for ongoing risk management.
Integration Capabilities: Works with CloudTrail and CloudWatch to centralize oversight and alerts.
Compliance Adherence: Aligns with industry benchmarks for strengthened regulatory compliance.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive reports with findings and CVEs.

What benefits do users gain from Amazon Inspector?

Enhanced Security: Automates vulnerability detection, reducing manual efforts.
Efficiency: Identifies and prioritizes threats, streamlining resource allocation.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed reports improve understanding and response strategies.
Regulatory Compliance: Aligns with compliance standards, aiding legal adherence.

Amazon Inspector is utilized across industries, including finance, healthcare, and tech, assisting with robust security management in cloud-native environments. By integrating with services like Security Hub and SIEM, businesses maintain compliance and streamline alert management. This solution supports broader security frameworks, often paired with third-party tools to enhance protection strategies.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

RSA Archer provides robust risk management, compliance, and vendor management with intuitive features for customizable and streamlined governance tasks.

RSA Archer delivers integrated solutions supporting risk management and compliance tasks. Its adaptive interface and customizable options enhance workflows, making it valuable for organizations requiring automation, advanced workflows, and easy integration capabilities. While offering flexibility and configuration power, users note potential enhancements for integration, reporting, and interface updates.

What are the key features of RSA Archer?

Easy Implementation: Facilitates quick setup and deployment.
Automation: Streamlines routine tasks for efficiency.
Advanced Workflows: Allows configuration of complex processes.
Dashboards: Provides visual insights into organizational data.
Integration Capabilities: Ensures seamless connectivity with external systems.
Reporting Features: Generates detailed reports for informed decision-making.
Customizable Permissions: Enhances control over access and roles.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Streamlined Processes: Reduces time spent on regulatory compliance tasks.
Improved Data Integration: Offers cohesive and actionable insights.
Configuration Flexibility: Adapts to specific business requirements.
Risk Mitigation: Enhances the ability to manage potential risks proactively.
Enhanced Governance: Strengthens adherence to industry standards and policies.

In the finance, public, and IT sectors, RSA Archer is utilized for managing risk and compliance. Organizations leverage its capabilities for third-party risk, policy management, and security assessments, providing tailored solutions for regulatory compliance and operational risk management. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow enhances its utility within enterprise environments.

RSA

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame

T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. RSA Archer

June 2026

Free Report: Amazon Inspector vs. RSA Archer

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Inspector vs. RSA Archer and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Inspector vs. RSA Archer report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.