Apiiro vs CAST Highlight comparison

Apiiro and CAST are both solutions in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category. Apiiro is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while CAST is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5. Apiiro holds a 2.1% mindshare in SCA, compared to CAST’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of CAST users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

2,568 Views
1,258 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CAST Highlight

Read 7 CAST Highlight reviews

2,130 Views
980 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Apiiro

CAST Highlight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

CAST Highlight and Apiiro are products in the software analysis space. CAST Highlight has an upper hand with integrated analytics and developer capabilities, whereas Apiiro dominates in comprehensive risk management and cloud-native security.

Features: CAST Highlight provides scalability, extensive code scan functionality, and comprehensive data analytics. In contrast, Apiiro emphasizes risk management, security automation, and seamless integration with cloud-native environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CAST Highlight offers straightforward integration and a manageable learning curve for fast results. Apiiro requires deeper technical integration but provides extensive support and guidance for security-focused enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: CAST Highlight is more cost-effective, with attractive initial costs and quick ROI for analysis-focused organizations. Apiiro, though more expensive, offers long-term ROI through enhanced security and risk mitigation, beneficial for security-invested enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. CAST Highlight Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. CAST Highlight

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (25th), API Security (17th), Software Supply Chain Security (9th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (20th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (7th)

CAST Highlight

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CAST Highlight is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apiiro	2.1%
CAST Highlight	1.3%
Other	96.6%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Jayanti Rode

Technical Associate Manager at Accenture

Identifies migration blockers and boosters while facing challenges with platform-specific roadblocks

The solution provides agnostic blockers for platforms as well as for containerization. Within that containerization, it offers generic blockers. However, my project might require it to provide Windows-specific blockers or Linux-specific blockers, as I often work with only one platform at a time. If I received categorization in containerization blockers, it would save time. Understanding only the OS-specific blockers means I would avoid resolving irrelevant issues, thus saving time. Initially, I receive a response from support, however, if there is involvement from R&D or other teams, it may take longer than expected. The support team is challenging when sharing source code. As this is a static code analysis tool, it sometimes requires source code for R&D. However, CAST clients may be restricted from sharing due to business logic and nondisclosure agreements. This creates a challenge, and I may have to share pseudo code or seek client approval, risking escalation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Apiiro for my company includes the metrics that we get from Apiiro, which have been extremely helpful."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The way it tells you which codebase is more ready for the cloud and which codebase is less ready is very valuable, and it works seamlessly with most languages."

"We've been using it for two years and found that it is really profitable to have the product in our arsenal."

"CAST Highlight provides a clear overview of the role portfolio and allows users to assess the overall quality of the environment. Users can see where improvements are needed and follow up on trends of the application."

"The solution provides agnostic blockers for platforms as well as for containerization."

"We are using CAST Highlight for the location because it's an indicator for us that can differentiate us from the other health insurance company, and we are using the indicator as proof of the quality of service for our application."

"The way it tells you which codebase is more ready for the cloud and which codebase is less ready is very valuable. It works seamlessly with most languages."

"The most valuable features of the CAST Highlight are the interface and there are three notations that are very simple to understand and communicate with."

"CAST Highlight is easy to use and has a good dashboard."

More CAST Highlight pros

Cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"It is a pretty costly tool. A lot of customers are resistant to using it."

"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. However, CAST Highlight is less expensive than the CAST AIP, but it remains too expensive and the professional services from CAST are also too expensive."

"CAST Highlight could improve to allow us to comment and do a deep analysis by ourselves."

"There could be potential improvements or additional features added to CAST Highlight to make it better."

"The ease of configuration and customization could be improved in CAST Highlight."

"Its price should be better. It is a pretty costly tool. They have two products: CAST Highlight and CAST AIP. I would expect CAST Highlight to have the Help dashboard and the Engineering dashboard. These dashboards are currently a part of CAST AIP, and if these are made available in CAST Highlight, customers won't have to use two different products all the time."

"The reports that describe the issues of concern are rather abstract and the issues should be more clearly described to the user."

"If I received categorization in containerization blockers, it would save time."

More CAST Highlight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Basic support is included with the standard licensing feed but it can be upgraded for an additional cost."

"It is a pretty costly tool. A lot of customers are resistant to using it."

"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. However, CAST Highlight is less expensive than the CAST AIP, but it remains too expensive and the professional services from CAST are also too expensive. The high price is part of the problem with the CAST solutions."

"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apiiro?

My only use case is the reporting, which is correct. My role is limited because this is an additional role that I do on top of my day job, so it is only limited to pulling out reports and working w...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apiiro?

I haven't explored Apiiro's advanced risk analysis features. I have not used the compliance monitoring feature of Apiiro so far. I am learning about Apiiro's AI-driven analytics for real-time feedb...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CAST Highlight?

The pricing of CAST Highlight was not considered expensive or cheap, and no specific comment was made about the setup cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CAST Highlight?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CAST Highlight?

For CAST, I use it in cloud migration roadmap and in open source safety issues. These are my two main use cases.

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 13% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube vs Apiiro

Compared 5% of the time

ArmorCode vs Apiiro

Compared 5% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Snyk vs CAST Highlight

Compared 15% of the time

Veracode vs CAST Highlight

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube vs CAST Highlight

Compared 11% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs CAST Highlight

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs CAST Highlight

Compared 3% of the time

More CAST Highlight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

May 2026

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

CAST Highlight

May 2026

Download CAST Highlight product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

No data available

Overview

Apiiro fosters seamless integration of security into the software development lifecycle, enhancing compliance and risk management through continuous code risk assessments.

Apiiro addresses security challenges by providing a robust platform that continuously monitors and assesses code risks. It integrates security directly into development processes to ensure compliance and reduce risk. By leveraging this approach, teams can manage risks proactively, safeguard applications, and enhance overall development efficiency.

What features make Apiiro valuable?

Continuous Code Risk Assessment: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities throughout the development lifecycle.
Integrated Compliance Automation: Streamlines compliance with various standards by automating checks and balances.
Contextual Insights: Delivers meaningful insights to facilitate informed decision-making on security practices.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork by aligning security teams with development workflows.

What benefits should you evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Frequent assessments lead to improved code quality and reduced vulnerabilities.
Risk Management Efficiency: Real-time analytics offer proactive risk mitigation, saving time and resources.
Accelerated Development: Automated processes enable faster and more secure software delivery.
Reduced Compliance Costs: Automated checks decrease compliance-related expenses.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Apiiro's integration improves compliance and security standards due to heightened regulatory requirements. Its risk-focused approach empowers these industries to secure data and meet stringent security requirements effectively.

Apiiro

CAST Highlight is a comprehensive platform that integrates with Azure DevOps, offering remote functionalities without direct codebase access. It quickly identifies cloud migration blockers and supports most programming languages with an easy setup.

CAST Highlight stands out with its user-friendly interface and dashboard, enabling efficient scanning for environment quality. Its automation and speed are particularly valued, making it distinct in the software analysis domain. While users encounter challenges with language-specific insights and expensive licensing, they benefit from its capability to assess code base states during mergers, acquisitions, and cloud migration planning. Technical support poses issues, and some users face hurdles with configuration customization and issue reporting clarity. Despite these challenges, CAST Highlight demonstrates effectiveness in identifying application service quality and ensuring legal, security, and IP compliance.

What features define CAST Highlight?

Seamless Integration: Works with Azure DevOps for enhanced functionality.
Remote Functionality: Operates without direct codebase access, offering flexibility.
Cloud Migration Assistance: Identifies blockers and boosters for cloud strategies.
Programming Language Support: Compatible with a wide range of languages.
Easy Setup: Simplifies the process for quick implementation.

What are the benefits of using CAST Highlight?

Speed and Automation: Delivers quick scans and automated processes for efficiency.
Application Quality Insights: Provides detailed assessments for application portfolios.
Enhanced Communication: Simple notations improve team communication.
Legal and Security Compliance: Ensures compliance insights are accessible.

CAST Highlight is adopted across industries for tasks such as assessing code during mergers, managing application portfolios, and planning cloud migrations. It facilitates open source safety checks and replatforming architectures, serving roles in firewall and storage management. Users rely on it for service quality verification and distinguishing applications from competitors.

CAST

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

Wells Fargo, Bank of NY Mellon, Northern Trust, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, BMW, AT&T, US Army, US Air Force, US Navy, John Hancock, Marsh & McLennan, Ernst & Young, PwC, Volkswagen, Boston Consulting Group, London Stock Exchange, Telefonica, Saur France, Total Energies France, SNCF

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. CAST Highlight

April 2026

Free Report: Apiiro vs. CAST Highlight

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. CAST Highlight and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. CAST Highlight report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.