

Appian and BizTalk Server compete in the business process management and integration sectors. Appian appears to have an edge due to its flexible pricing and low-code model, which enhances rapid development and deployment.
Features:Appian offers rapid development with its low-code platform, enabling quick implementation of applications. Its case management and process modeling capabilities allow for diverse application development. Appian's ease of use is bolstered by its seamless integration and architecture, facilitating intuitive operations. BizTalk Server's strengths lie in its robust integration with various systems through adapters, the capability to handle complex mappings and orchestrations, and its stable platform for long-running transactions.
Room for Improvement:Appian can improve by offering more cost-effective solutions for its deployment, enhancing customization options for its UI components, and expanding its integration capabilities with third-party systems. BizTalk Server needs to address its substantial licensing costs, ensure better utilization of its features to justify expenses, and expand its cloud adapter options to remain competitive against newer cloud-based solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Appian's deployment is generally straightforward, thanks to its low-code environment, with strong customer support that assists through the project lifecycle. BizTalk Server's deployment can be more complex, particularly for organizations new to integration solutions, but it benefits from longstanding support structures within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI:Appian's pricing reflects its capabilities in automation and BPM, although it can be perceived as expensive. However, the ROI is supported by labor and operational efficiencies achieved through its platform. BizTalk Server's high licensing costs make it essential to fully leverage its capabilities to ensure cost-effectiveness, particularly in comparison to other more affordable integration solutions.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.
BizTalk Server's ROI is comparatively higher than Boomi and Workato.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Appian is scalable, but it depends on how you build your applications.
It is time for low-code, no-code, and a quick go-to-market should be faster.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.
BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
If Appian can suggest the country based on that address, it would significantly decrease error rates in processing remittance.
I would like to see more enhancement in the user interface to allow more freedom in designing the sites and pages.
BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.
We initially planned to move to Azure Integration Services, but there are challenges with AIS, so now we are evaluating WebMethods IO.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
The price of Appian, on a competitive landscape, is a little bit on the higher side for companies, rating maybe a 6.5.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.
Appian also utilizes AI for business users, providing a feature called process each view, enabling business users to create their own dashboards, reports, and gain insights from their data and processes using artificial intelligence.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market.
BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Appian | 4.8% |
| BizTalk Server | 1.2% |
| Other | 94.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Appian provides a low-code platform designed for rapid application development, allowing businesses to enhance their efficiency through automation and integration while offering scalable and mobile-friendly solutions.
Appian stands out with its capability to streamline business processes through its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality, robust process management, and AI integration. It supports rapid deployment, automation, and scalability, making it suitable for enterprise-wide applications. Its continuous updates ensure agile customization, while seamless integration with external systems enables efficient data management. Despite some challenges with UI customization and external integrations, particularly with Microsoft products, Appian remains a valuable tool for businesses across industries seeking improved workflow management and data integration.
What are Appian's key features?Appian is primarily used in industries like banking, telecom, and manufacturing, assisting companies in managing workflows and automating processes. From application creation to data integration, it aids in enterprise-wide initiatives including mobile application deployment, real-time data processing, and intelligent automation.
BizTalk Server integrates Visual Studio, enabling orchestration for complex business processes. It provides extensive adapter support and reliable messaging with XML transaction handling. Its stability and security simplify integration efforts for sectors needing robust data transfer capabilities.
BizTalk Server serves as middleware, facilitating communication between systems. It's designed for system integration, mobile apps, websites, warehouse management, and banking verification. BizTalk manages complex orchestrations, data transformation, and message transfers using a variety of adapters. Trusted in industries like manufacturing, oil, gas, and shipping, it provides reliability and performance for connecting different systems.
What are BizTalk Server's most valuable features?Industries implement BizTalk Server to integrate disparate systems, manage logistics, and maintain data flow in complex environments. In manufacturing, it connects production systems for efficient resource management. In oil and gas, it orchestrates data from multiple sources to ensure safety and compliance. Shipping sectors use it for real-time tracking and communication between global partners.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.