Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Appian and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Appian is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while TIBCO is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.7. Appian holds a 5.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Appian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Appian

Read 63 Appian reviews

11,416 Views
4,452 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews

499 Views
489 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Appian

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Appian and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM are key competitors in business process management. Appian appears to hold the advantage with its low-code capabilities and faster ROI, whereas TIBCO is favored by large enterprises for its robust stability and integration despite higher initial costs.

Features: Appian offers rapid low-code development, enabling fast app deployment and integration, which is ideal for businesses needing quick results. It simplifies development with features like Records and Related Actions, allowing diverse application types. Appian’s cohesive design makes it intuitive, fostering easier user adoption. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM provides stable workflow management with its low-code drag-and-drop tools, however, it requires TCI for advanced task customization. Its integration strengths suit complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Appian can enhance UI customization, offline capabilities, testing tools, and more flexible integration options for mobile applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could improve coding flexibility in BPM, ease cloud transitions, and offer better technical support for complex cases. Documentation for such use cases also needs enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian provides flexible cloud deployment, which increases accessibility and facilitates customer use. Its customer service receives positive feedback for its robust support models. TIBCO, focusing more on on-premises deployment, offers thorough but sometimes slow technical support for complex problems.

Pricing and ROI: Appian is recognized for its cost-efficient licensing, leading to quicker ROI aided by its low-code and cloud offerings. In contrast, TIBCO's pricing is higher with fewer flexible options, which could deter smaller enterprises. While TIBCO offers long-term stability, Appian's pricing and fast implementation deliver an early ROI advantage.

To learn more, read our detailed Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Appian

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (8th), Rapid Application Development Software (9th), Low-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (8th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

31st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Appian is 5.7%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Kunal Sharda

Director & Key Managerial Personnel at Newlight Technology Solutions Private Limited

Experience enables seamless automation and elevates process efficiency while embracing innovative technologies

The features of Appian that have proven to be the most beneficial are its capability to create processes and integrate with external systems while ensuring data consistency across all the systems. The latest features of Appian are quite useful around the UI/UX design and the artificial intelligence integrations. Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way. Another way is through AI Skills, which can be integrated anywhere in the process model to leverage artificial intelligence for tasks such as extracting data from documents, summarizing information from documents or long paragraphs, and building custom prompts with Appian. Appian also utilizes AI for business users, providing a feature called process each view, enabling business users to create their own dashboards, reports, and gain insights from their data and processes using artificial intelligence. It's multi-fold and always growing.

Read full review

Ray Ochieng

Integration Lead at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Appian's most valuable features are the quick time it takes to develop for the market. It's easy and faster than other BPM solutions."

"The most productive aspect of Appian lies in its ability to develop interfaces, particularly user interfaces. Creating user interfaces is highly productive, when these interfaces are integrated with the original database. In such cases, using record types proves to be a very efficient method of handling data. The synergy between interfaces and record types enhances productivity."

"Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."

"Technical support is quite responsive."

"The most valuable features are the low coding and low code data."

"Even with an on-premise implementation, the scalability is still high, so it is easy to scale up."

"This is the most complete solution of its kind."

"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."

More Appian pros

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."

"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

Cons

"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."

"The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved."

"Form creation and SAIL proprietary language still basically require programming. The claim a BA type can do everything is hogwash."

"The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well."

"We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."

"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."

"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."

"Lacks integration with other products."

More Appian cons

"The maintenance of the package could be improved."

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

"Technical support needs to be streamlined."

"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."

"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to pricing, it's definitely not affordable. However, it really depends on the requirements that you're seeking from the solution."

"The solution offers a monthly subscription model. That's what we use. I recall it being about $90 a month. They do have different tiers."

"The price is high."

"The price of the solution is reasonable and is paid annually. The price of the solution depends on how many users use the solution. It can range from $50,000 to $200,000. For example, for 20,000 users the price can be approximately $200,000."

"The cost is a bit higher than other low-code competitors, OutSystems and Mendix. The price needs to be more competitive."

"Appian is very flexible in their pricing. In general, Appian's pricing is much, much lower when compared to competition like Pega or other products. Appian also has a flexible licensing model across geographies. Pega usually goes with a single licensing cost—which is a US-based cost—for all global customers, and it's costly. Whereas Appian has a different regional licensing cost model and it can be cheaper, depending on geography. So Appian's licensing is very flexible, and cheaper when compared to other competition."

"It is expensive, but powerful. I would recommend comparing against cheaper licensing products and open source."

"The cost is calculated on a per-user basis. It might be expensive for small and mid-sized enterprises."

More Appian pricing and cost advice

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

36%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?

Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. There is a whole section on their company’s website where you can check out the edu...

See all answers

Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?

We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in its essence, means it is meant for business users and inexperienced beginners. So...

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs Appian

Compared 11% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Appian

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs Appian

Compared 9% of the time

OutSystems vs Appian

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs Appian

Compared 7% of the time

More Appian Competitors

Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 39% of the time

TIBCO iProcess Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 13% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Appian

August 2025

Download Appian product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

July 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report

Also Known As

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS

No data available

Overview

Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:

Complete automation: Through complete automation, companies are able to coordinate and manage employees, existing systems, bots, data, and artificial intelligence (AI) in a single workflow. The solution offers a way to centrally manage all third-party automation vendors as well.
Low-code applications: Appian offers the ability to build applications faster with visual development and low-code tools. All applications are ready-made to be suitable for mobile.
Low-code data: Appian lets companies source data from multiple types of sources, eliminating the need for data migration. Through no-code and low-code solutions and industry-standard connectors, the platform also eliminates the need for data silos.
Enterprise ready: The platform offers options for companies to scale their businesses to an enterprise level without complications.

Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.

Appian Features

Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:

Robotic process automation (RPA): Users of Appian can assign software bots to perform rules-based tasks that need to be repeated over a set course of time. This can improve efficiency and performance within an organization while saving human resources.
Intelligent document processing: The tool offers a feature for quick and accurate extraction and structuring of data. This can reduce time and costs for organizations because it eliminates the need for outsourcing such services.
AI: Appian utilizes artificial intelligence to enhance applications, workflows, and automation. AI is also used to address complex processes and unique situations.
Business rules: Organizations can automate and simplify work processes while adhering to their operating procedures.
Application development: Appian provides a low-code development feature that allows users to deploy applications over ten times faster than through conventional approaches. This feature not only allows for quick application building, but also applications that run on multiple types of platforms, seamless data integration, and business scalability.
Integrations and data: Appian allows for data integration from a wide array of sources without the need for migration. This contributes to easy access to data across systems, real-time data insights, improved user experience, and accelerated development.

Appian Benefits

The benefits of using Appian include:

The solution ensures seamless organization growth, as it supports various UX patterns, common data schemes, and upgrades, used to facilitate application development on a bigger scale.
Appian can increase process speed and deliver applications considerably faster compared to conventional development.
The platform is easy to use and suitable for complete beginners to build applications and workflows.
Appian offers a variety of design tools that facilitate development and deployment.
Appian offers detailed real-time data insight which allows organizations to access relevant information about their processes as they are developing.
The solution offers clients the ability to move data between the cloud, on-premise, and hybrid configurations.
The platform is easy to optimize, which allows businesses to utilize it according to their personal needs.
Appian offers connectivity across web, mobile, email, voice, and chat, providing a multi-channel experience for companies and their clients.

Reviews from Real Users

A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.

Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.

Appian

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

Buyer's Guide

Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

July 2025

Free Report: Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appian vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.