Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Applitools Eyes vs BrowserStack comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Applitools Eyes
Ranking in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BrowserStack
Ranking in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Applitools Eyes is 1.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BrowserStack is 12.7%, down from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BrowserStack12.7%
Applitools Eyes1.8%
Other85.5%
AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Applitools Eyes?
Leave a review
RM
Managing Technical Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Cross-platform testing has accelerated releases and now needs smarter AI-driven test creation
The best features that BrowserStack offers include the ability to run manual and automated tests on real devices. We can create bugs, integrate it with other platforms like Jira or Azure, and use self-healing scripts with Selenium. We also have the test runs for different versions or with different frameworks, not just Selenium but with Playwright as well. Additionally, there are real-time dashboards and notifications sent when tests fail or when we need screenshots or recordings of test executions, and we can easily integrate this into our pipelines. BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by providing an out-of-the-box solution for whole test executions across different projects for our automobile customers. We have worked on around twenty to thirty projects, and the need for a stable, customizable single test execution platform that supports different platforms has been met. It has helped manage the entire quality assurance of the product efficiently. The measurable improvements due to BrowserStack include a significant efficiency gain, allowing the whole team to collaborate on testing and communicate faster. Also, the easier integration with project management tools has been beneficial. The documentation of findings has improved, which helps us share insights with different project stakeholders.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about BrowserStack?
The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good.
What needs improvement with BrowserStack?
I feel there is not much to improve about BrowserStack.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack, CloudBees, Digital.ai and others in AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.